[PaQSO] RTTY/PSK
Michael Coslo
mjc5 at psu.edu
Thu Mar 2 10:28:43 EST 2006
On Mar 1, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Stan Reas wrote:
>
>> The necessary changes will be to add digital fields to the
>> scoring,
>> and to add their points at the proper point value to the score.
>>
>> The additions are RTTY and PSK QSO. A person can
>> potentially make a:
>>
>> CW
>> SSB
>> RTTY
>> PSK
>>
>> contact with the same other OP on any given band.
>>
>> CW is worth 2 points on 160 and 80 meters, and 1.5 points
>> on the
>> other bands used in the contest.
>>
>> SSB is worth 1 point on any band.
>>
>> RTTY and PSK are worth 2 points on any band.
>
> VERY POOR idea to give these "digital" modes 2 points on all bands.
I have received some other emails such as this, and frankly I am
surprised at the concern among some amateurs that we are trying to
punish or discourage CW by adding digital modes.
Here is what we are trying to do.
There have been a lot of requests for inclusion of digital modes in
the party. Due to the surging popularity of PSK mode, it was a
natural for inclusion. RTTY has also had a rebirth since the advent
of sound card modes, so the consensus was that we should add that
too. Truth is, there was a fair amount of thought that all digital
modes should be counted, but I thought that it might be confusing to
do that.
We are trying to encourage Amateurs to get on the air and have a fun
time in the QSO party. We like to encourage different modes of
operation. That is one of the reasons why CW contacts are worth more
than SSB, and it is why we try to encourage 80/160 meter CW contacts
with 2 points per QSO.
So let's go over the rationale of the scoring. I'll start with why
things are the way they are now.
In QSO parties, as in many other competitive activities, the rules
are what they are as a result of tinkering over the years. Our rules
have ended up with some quirks in them, such as the 1.5 points per
QSO above 80 meters. Even though that is related to the encouragement
we want to give to CW Operations below 40 meters, it is a nuisance.
One very common mistake on the summary sheets is improper
multiplication of that half point.
But it is how the rules are, and the last thing I am going to do is
add another 1.5 point QSO. I have considered changing all CW contacts
to 2 points, but that is a matter for another time.
In any event, the slower speed of the digital contacts, coupled with
the encouragement that we wish to give to use of the modes, are the
major reasons that they garner more points per QSO. So they get 2
points.
Another bit of controversy is that both PSK and RTTY are counted as
separate modes. Some have suggested that they should be lumped
together as one. But after a lot of consideration, the modes are
separate enough in character that they are considered separate. I'm
not sure how other software is, but I have to change programs to
change modes. That means starting and stopping the programs, because
they capture the sound card. A lot of QSO's can go by in that amount
of time.
>
> CW is the original digital mode !
And a fine mode it is. We like to encourage the use of CW.
>
> Keep it up, you'll run us CW operators off !
That would be unfortunate, Stan. All of our participants are
precious to us, from the big guns to the "little guys" who turn in
logs with 10-20 QSO's in them. The impact of the digital mode
additions are not likely to be major. My guess is that there will be
30-40 participants in the digital modes.. That would be less than 5
percent of the total participants in the party. Hopefully that is
not such an unbearable thing. I hope to see your log after the 2006
party,and work you in it.
- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -
More information about the PaQSO
mailing list