[PaQSO] N3SH 2006 Bonus Station Update 08/06
Mike Coslo
mjc5 at psu.edu
Sun Aug 13 18:33:53 EDT 2006
Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
>I'm sorry. I don't get it. I just don't get it.
>
>This isn't the first time that this has been planned. Why all the fuss?
>
>OBVIOUSLY the various bonus stations will ID themselves on the air to
>indicate their county -- county name on voice, / three letter abbrevriation
>on CW & digital. Just like W3UU, for one, did in the past! Who ever said
>we'd do otherwise?
>
>Nor do I have to "rethink" the /R, and frankly, demands that I do so
>irritate me. The original point was that IF your software, should you be
>using software, be unable to handle the bonus stations from multiple
>counties, THEN you should log it as a Rover. I DID NOT say that the various
>N3SH stations would be signing /R. Therefore there is nothing to rethink.
>Paul N0VLR was making the same point about you using /R for LOGGING purposes
>IF your software has a problem with it.
>
>
Okay, everyone back in your corners! ;^)
One of the first things to clear up is that if a software log
program needs to use a /R in order to log multi station Special event
Stations, our contest software has no problem with that. What counts for
mobile or rover is what is put on the summary sheet. If the log software
wants county names, then that is cool too.
There is no problem there at all. If your software can't handle it,
then it probably didn't handle PAQSO party req's before.
- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -
More information about the PaQSO
mailing list