[PaQSO] CL Rules?

[n3ntj at earthlink.net]

Not a bad idea.  A lot of people do CW only and can really rack up the points.  Some of us stick to phone.  It may make the final results a little more fairer.  Phone/CW, CW only, Phone only.

-----Original Message-----
From: "n3xls at juno.com" <n3xls at juno.com>
Sent: Oct 12, 2005 7:50 PM
To: PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [PaQSO] CL Rules?

Well on other topics as well as RTTY and PSK i was thinking there is one thing that this contest could use since it seems some in this contest go this route. is a CW only, SSB only or both category. you can do this now but not without some special recognition. whats everyone think?

-- "John Passaneau" <w3jxp at adelphia.net> wrote:
You may get half your idea..........

John Passaneau W3JXP
State College Pa.
w3jxp at adelphia.net

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Al Zelna" <mr.mri at epix.net>
To: <PaQSO at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 10:21 PM
Subject: [PaQSO] CL Rules?


I have an idea!  The NARC negates the entire CL concept for 2006 and adds a
PSK/RTTY category.  Can we get past this topic now that new cannon fodder is
on the field?





Al, N3KAE





PS:  New Wyoming County M/M record claimed 218,329



http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/3830/2005-10/msg00421.html

_______________________________________________
PaQSO mailing list
PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso 

_______________________________________________
PaQSO mailing list
PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
_______________________________________________
PaQSO mailing list
PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso