[PaQSO] RTTY

[Bill G. K3SV]

My vote is to keep things the same. However, either way, I'll be phone and
cw and that'll keep me plenty busy.
73 Bill K3SV

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter C. Albright" <palbrigh at velocity.net>
To: "PA QSO Party" <paqso at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:35 AM
Subject: RE: [PaQSO] RTTY


> I would add my vote to this configuration, even though I myself will
> probably stick to CW and some SSB.
>
> Peter Albright, AA2AD
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: paqso-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> > [mailto:paqso-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Bob Wiseman
> > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:04 PM
> > To: paqso at mailman.qth.net
> > Subject: Re: [PaQSO] RTTY
> >
> >
> > The ARRL Field Day has been pretty successful in treating them as
separate
> > modes. The following is from ARRL 2005 F.D. rules:
> >
> > "Phone, CW and Digital (non-CW) modes on a band are considered as
separate
> > bands. A station may be worked only once per band under this rule."
> >
> > I add my vote to the "Yes" column (as long as all the other digital
modes
> > are included, and not just RTTY).
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PaQSO mailing list
> PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso