[PaQSO] A View From the Road

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:22:52 -0400

Jim,

As memory serves, before the Rover class was added, there was no distinction
between what we now call a Mobile & a Rover, so you wouldn't have had a
problem with what you propose.

But... maybe I'm missing the obvious (wouldn't be the first time), but so
what if you operated partially as a Rover and partially as a Mobile?   Now I
wouldn't expect you to work the same station from the same county both as a
/M and a /R, but outside of that...  either way, the point is that as either
a /R or /M, you are indicating that you are temporarily in a given location,
and will soon be elsewhere, one way or the other.

Having said that, if I were to attempt this hybrid /R & /M operation (I miss
HF mobile... one of these days...), I'd simplify things and just consider
myself a Rover throughout.  But that's based on my interpretation of the
rules... I could be wrong...

73, ron wn3vaw
"Be who you are, say what you think, people that matter don't care, and
people that care don't matter." -- Dr. Seuss

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:35 PM
Subject: [PaQSO] A View From the Road

If you are of the opinion that the PaQP as presently constituted is the best
possible contest that could ever be conceived, and must never be improved,
save yourself some time. Find the key on the keyboard in front of you that
says "Delete", and press it now.

Otherwise, consider this:

Once again I did the PaQP (Saturday only) driving around Pennsylvania making
lots of QSOs.  I had over 800 QSOs from 23 counties, including some of those
places people are listing as the most difficult, like ARM, JEF, FOR, ELK,
JUN, PER.

Only 100 of these QSOs were on SSB.  It's not that I don't like SSB or that
I
didn't try, at least before about 9 PM EDT.  It's just that mobile operation
on SSB is a lot tougher than on CW.  Since there isn't a lot of activity on
CW in general, by tuning just a little farther away from the PaQP pack one
could always find a clear frequency.  Once there, an S-7 signal was plenty
loud enough to be heard.

OTOH on SSB, there just aren't a lot of open frequencies, and even if I did
find one that seemed clear, an S-7 signal doesn't get a lot of attention.  I
could call people on SSB, but if there was anyone else calling, they won the
pileup.  I can't spend a lot of time waiting around in pileups, so usually
after a few SSB qsos, it was back to CW to get the rate up.

And this is describing 40 meters.  On 80, things are even worse.  And
mobile,
you don't even think about 160!

I spent some time parked in some of the rarer counties.  This sometimes
helps
because I can better hear how clear a frequency might be, but my signal
doesn't get any louder by being parked.

I could be a lot louder, but the rules, at least as interpreted, don't allow
it.  Last year I inquired about if I could combine operating mobile with
some
interspersed stops where I'd throw a dipole up in some trees or with a
portable mast.  I'd have submitted the entry as a rover.

The response was no way, I'd have to submit the mobile qsos as a mobile log,
and the qsos while parked as a rover log.  So I said forget it, and stayed a
pure mobile, always capable of motion even if I occasionally stopped, and
never had a signal that would make a dent on SSB.

My suggestion: Why not define the rover class as any operation from multiple
locations, using portable antennas? Including operation while moving. That's
what the rover definition has always been in the VHF contests.

My strategy with such an option would be to find locations in rare counties
that could be run for an hour or so, and then operate mobile while en route
to the next such place, or while passing through common counties.  I'd run a
lot of CW while moving, lots of SSB while parked.  Phone operators would
finally get some of the benefits of my travels.

It seems counterproductive to prohibit rover stations from making QSOs while
en route from one location to another.

73  -  Jim   K8MR

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---
_______________________________________________
PaQSO mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso