[PaQSO] 2001 percentages

Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:19:20 -0400

Good stats folks.  That's a nice jump in total points from 1989 to present!

----- Original Message -----
From: "john" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; "PA QSO Party" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:48
Subject: [PaQSO] 2001 percentages

> Ed, I know this isn't what you were talkin g about, but I thought it might
> be fun to look at last years county scores as a percentage of the total
> scores.
>
> BTW, if I didn't make any mistakes, there were 15,561,901 points reported
in
> the 2001 party. Compare that with 9,845,029 in 1989. This is just a tad
> lower than 1998's total of 16,704,385.
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> John, KD8MQ
> www.qsl.net/kd8mq
>
>
>
>
>
> County Section  Score  percent
> Potter (POT) WPA  4,065  0.03    %
> Snyder (SNY) EPA  4,119  0.03%
> Bradford (BRA) EPA  12,223  0.08%
> Perry (PER) EPA  24,964  0.16%
> Armstrong (ARM) WPA  25,288  0.16%
> Forest (FOR) WPA  34,789  0.22%
> Tioga (TIO) EPA  48,166  0.31%
> Lancaster (LAN) EPA  52,341  0.34%
> Clarion (CLA) WPA  53,044  0.34%
> Susquehanna (SUS) EPA  56,964  0.37%
> Cumberland (CUM) EPA  60,742  0.39%
> Elk (ELK) WPA  61,615  0.40%
> Northumberland (NUM) EPA  64,315  0.41%
> Cameron (CRN) WPA  65,141  0.42%
> Fulton (FUL) WPA  72,570  0.47%
> Centre (CEN) WPA  77,712  0.50%
> Fayette (FAY) WPA  82,731  0.53%
> Mercer (MER) WPA  85,865  0.55%
> Somerset (SOM) WPA  88,174  0.57%
> Franklin (FRA) WPA  91,381  0.59%
> Lawrence (LAW) WPA  97,155  0.62%
> Clinton (CLI) WPA  97,417  0.63%
> Dauphin (DAU) EPA  101,728  0.65%
> Greene (GRE) WPA  101,942  0.66%
> Wayne (WAY) EPA  106,470  0.68%
> Sullivan (SUL) EPA  114,800  0.74%
> Bedford (BED) WPA  122,636  0.79%
> Pike (PIK) EPA  130,690  0.84%
> Westmoreland (WES) WPA  131,270  0.84%
> Butler (BUT) WPA  135,312  0.87%
> Wyoming (WYO) EPA  148,663  0.96%
> Mifflin (MIF) WPA  149,138  0.96%
> Indiana (INN) WPA  149,147  0.96%
> Montour (MTR) EPA  160,410  1.03%
> Blair (BLA) WPA  172,912  1.11%
> Huntingdon (HUN) WPA  172,997  1.11%
> Venango (VEN) WPA  173,382  1.11%
> Union (UNI) EPA  174,821  1.12%
> Columbia (COL) EPA  175,712  1.13%
> Philadelphia (PHI) EPA  178,774  1.15%
> Juniata (JUN) EPA  181,594  1.17%
> Chester (CHE) EPA  182,896  1.18%
> Clearfield (CLE) WPA  188,888  1.21%
> Delaware (DCO) EPA  193,167  1.24%
> Lycoming (LYC) EPA  202,773  1.30%
> Bucks (BUX) EPA  205,379  1.32%
> Adams(ADA) EPA  212,807  1.37%
> Cambria (CMB) WPA  220,329  1.42%
> York (YOR) EPA  222,486  1.43%
> Lackawanna (LAC) EPA  224,897  1.45%
> Crawford (CRA) WPA  249,634  1.60%
> Warren (WAR) WPA  268,565  1.73%
> Lebanon (LEB) EPA  273,127  1.76%
> McKean (MCK) WPA  275,202  1.77%
> Jefferson (JEF) WPA  297,797  1.91%
> Lehigh (LEH) EPA  361,160  2.32%
> Carbon (CAR) EPA  363,017  2.33%
> Schuykill (SCH) EPA  368,932  2.37%
> Beaver (BEA) WPA  408,065  2.62%
> Washington (WAS) WPA  439,204  2.82%
> Montgomery (MGY) EPA  443,843  2.85%
> Monroe (MOE) EPA  497,921  3.20%
> Northampton (NHA) EPA  547,454  3.52%
> Allegheny (ALL) WPA  754,512  4.85%
> Berks (BER) EPA  1,084,903  6.97%
> Erie (ERI) WPA  1,108,302  7.12%
> Luzerne (LUZ) EPA  1,923,462  12.36%
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "john" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>; "PA QSO Party" <[email protected]>
> Sent: July 16, 2002 9:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [PaQSO] Still looking for ARM QTH
>
>
> > Darn it Ed, I like that. You've got me thinking about adding average
qsos
> to
> > my pages now. If I do, it'll be your fault.
> >
> > Seriously, I like the idea. You have me thinking.
> > Using the total scores per county method, ARM, & FOR are 4th & 5th
> > respectively, in lowest activity
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > John Myers, KD8MQ
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: July 16, 2002 9:06 AM
> > Subject: Re: [PaQSO] Still looking for ARM QTH
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I did a little number crunching last night, just for the halibut
> > >
> > > I looked at the number of QSO's I had with each county each of the
last
> 4
> > > years. Not the number of stations, but the number of QSO's.
> > >
> > > ARM was tied with FOR for the lowest average # of QSO's....2.25/year
> > > average. Next rarest for me were NUM and DAU at 2.75 Q's/year average
> > > followed by ELK and CRN at 2.75.
> > >
> > > I have not compared how this matches with KD8MQ's data....I was
> interested
> > > in my results as opposed to the "whole" results.
> > >
> > > My point,,,,,,I sure hope you make it to ARM John.
> > >
> > > Ed/WA3SES
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >                     "John Myers"
> > >                     <[email protected]       To:     "PA QSO Party"
> > <[email protected]>
> > >                     m>                      cc:
> > >                     Sent by:                Subject:     [PaQSO] Still
> > looking for ARM QTH
> > >                     paqso-admin@mailm
> > >                     an.qth.net
> > >
> >
> > >                     07/16/02 06:53 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > HI all,
> > >
> > > I'm still looking for a QTH in ARM. Campgrounds, I've found. But, not
> > > cabins. I'm going to male some phone calls today, but it's beginning
to
> > > look
> > > like I'd better invest in that tent heater. :-).
> > >
> > > 73,
> > >
> > >
> > > John Myers, KD8MQ
> > > www.qsl.net/kd8mq
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PaQSO mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PaQSO mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PaQSO mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PaQSO mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso