[PaQSO] Two questions

Tue, 16 Jul 2002 03:02:21 -0000

I propose NO Changes to the PA QSO Party rules.  Thanks, Bill, K3ANS>>
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PaQSO] Two questions


> Enjoying reading the comments on this subject.
>
> WT3P, Kay's comment about generating pile ups is right on...no other
> contest affords this opportunity to me to anywhere near the same degree.
>
> 2 points for ALL CW QSO's? Hmmmm....sounds interesting. Any more
> thoughts/comments?
>
> I think it was Jim, K8MR that mentioned working all 67 county's on SSB AND
> CW to qualify for the sweep award, and as a new set of 67 mults also.
Seems
> we've generated so much activity that getting the sweep is a little on the
> easy side now. I've been lucky enough to get the sweep 5 or 6  years
> running...but seems I get it rather late in the contest each year. How
> about "Worked all countys CW AND SSB", or maybe two separate awards
(worked
> all county CW and worked all countys SSB). A quick look at my log from
last
> year shows 56 cty's worked on CW and 63 on SSB, so I didn't get a sweep on
> either mode separately. I think that would be fun to shoot for.
>
> And as for the low/hi power distinction for portable operation, I agree
> with N3FR's thoughts. And I'll have a separate reply on that subject.
>
> Thanks all; really enjoying all the chatter.
>
> 73
> Ed/WA3SES
>
> _______________________________________________
> PaQSO mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso