[OKDXA] FW: ZL - 60 Meters Allocation - Not 60 Meter WAS

[D C _Mac_ Macdonald]

BUT, if we don't build antennas for it and use it, we may lose it anyway!
It can be a nice band for fairly close in QSOs during day and night.

73 - Mac, K2GKK/5
Since 30 Nov 1953
Oklahoma City, OK
USAF (Retired) 61-81
FAA (Retired) 94-10




________________________________
From: okdxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net <okdxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net> on behalf of Jeff Martin <jeffmartin at valornet.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 15:31
To: 'Oklahoma DX Association' <okdxa at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [OKDXA] FW: ZL - 60 Meters Allocation - Not 60 Meter WAS

  Just for the record... My post to the reflector of the New Zealand letter
regarding the ending of 60 meter privileges for ZL hams had nothing to do
with 60 meter WAS. It was simply a posting of an informational document I
ran across which I thought might be of interest to OKDXA reflector
subscribers. As part of my role as Sec/Treas, I occasionally post things to
the reflector that I hope might be of interest. I'm aware that 60 meter
QSO's do not count toward ARRL awards, a separate issue... If we don't use
the band, within the proper constraints as outlined in the "60 Meter FAQ" on
the ARRL website, we may end up losing it, like New Zealand...
  Have fun everyone... Hope you work a new one...

73,
Jeff - K5WE