[OKDXA] ARRL DX News, Part 2
GARYLM at kiamichiwb.org
GARYLM at kiamichiwb.org
Tue Jan 7 18:05:14 EST 2020
HI COY,
I THINK IT SHOULD BE LEFT THE WAY IT IS, CAN STILL GET THE ENDORSEMENTS AND PLAQUES FOR WORKING ALL 100 COUNTRIES ON ALL BANDS.
HAS ANYONE BEEN ABLE TO HEAR THE E44RU AND ZC4, HAVE HAD NOT COPY HERE.
73 HNY
GARY
WQ5R
--- coyday62 at gmail.com wrote:
From: N5OK <coyday62 at gmail.com>
To: Oklahoma DX Association <okdxa at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [OKDXA] ARRL DX News, Part 2
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:36:31 -0600
Thanks Jeff for advertising this. I have received several comments from
members. I won't comment since i'm the one collecting the input. I will
say that the fuse is short on this as we want to get something to the Board
before they have the January meeting.
I can share my feelings as well as the results that I have. After the
deadline, if you would like.
73, Coy
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:16 AM Jeff Martin <jeffmartin at valornet.com> wrote:
> Regarding my previous post of the ARRL DX News, I'm sure everyone is
> furiously writing your comments to Coy... hi... Before commenting, I
> decided
> to go on the ARRL website and research the rules about 5BDXCC. Here they
> are:
>
> DXCC Rules
> Section I. Basic Rules
> r) Five-Band DXCC (5BDXCC): The 5BDXCC certificate is available for working
> and confirming 100 current DXCC entities (deleted entities don't count for
> this award) on each of the following five bands: 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10
> Meters. Contacts are valid from November 15, 1945. Sticker endorsements are
> available for certificates. Please see DXCC Item Order Form for prices.
> The 5BDXCC is endorsable for these additional bands: 160, 30, 17, 12, 6 and
> 2 Meters. 5BDXCC qualifiers are eligible for an individually engraved
> plaque.
>
> So, I guess the issue is do we leave things as they are with the 5
> traditional bands or shake things up a bit and allow ANY 5 bands. The award
> is already endorsable for additional bands. The DXAC wants to know if this
> opinion appears to be widely shared, whether it's motivated by the current
> ebb in the solar cycle, whether it devalues the award, and if it goes
> against the original intent of the 5BDXCC award. What do you think?
>
> The second issue was removing silent keys from the DXCC Annual List. What
> do you think?
>
> Anyone care to comment?
>
> 73,
> Jeff - K5WE
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> OKDXA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
--
Coy C Day, N5OK
20685 SW 29
Union City, OK 73090
H(405) 483-5632 C(405) 448-2368
n5ok at arrl.net
______________________________________________________________
OKDXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the OKDXA
mailing list