[OKDXA] RHR Remote Ham Radio

[Robert Redmon]

I have no problem with any of the RHR systems or the folks who chose to 
use them,  but I see no reason to change DXCC rules to include them. 
IMHO, any DXCC credit should be earned from the the registered station 
location of the ham applying for DXCC credit. That does not preclude the 
use of remote systems that control the "home" station at all and rules, 
and accommodations for portable and mobile operation already exist. This 
is no different than the various internet linked ham repeater systems. 
No one would consider a contact using one of those eligible for DXCC 
credit, right?

Bob
On 12/4/2014 2:06 PM, Jerry Chouinard via OKDXA wrote:
> W2RE is the honcho behind RHR. I think no one is going to get rich providing thestuff but you are correct - there is a large movement toward it.
> I get newsletters from RHR monthly touting the addition of another megasiteto their offerings.
> K5YAA
>
>       On Thursday, December 4, 2014 1:49 PM, Rick Vidmar <K9KK at atlinkwifi.com> wrote:
>     
>
>   RHR
>    Remote Ham Radio.
> It's here and bigger than I have imagined.
> Check out this link.
>
> WWW.RemoteHamRadio.com
>
> Probably time to consider a 2nd DXCC class.
> 1.  The traditional "HOME" DXCC
> 2.  A new class to accommodate the "REMOTE" operations.
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> OKDXA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>     
> ______________________________________________________________
> OKDXA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

-- 
Robert Redmon K5SM
AMA 58073