[OKDXA] Low Band Report 11/13

[K5TT]

Thanks Ken.  I was using info from the clusters.  Since I got your note, I 
checked a few websites and you may be right.  Everything I found said N. 
Cook for both.  That is bad for me, I need S. Cook on 80m.

Jim
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Case" <caseke at cox.net>
To: "Discussion of OKDXA" <okdxa at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [OKDXA] Low Band Report 11/13


> Hi Jim,
>
> I had seen E51PEN and PDX posted as both South Cook and North Cook.  When 
> PEN was begging, I asked and he said North Cook for both of them.
>
> Don't know if that helps of hurts.  It helped me.
>
> 73, Ken K5KC
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "K5TT" <k5tt at cox.net>
> To: "OKDXA" <okdxa at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 7:32 AM
> Subject: [OKDXA] Low Band Report 11/13
>
>
>> Several JA's had good signals on 160m this morning.  Nothing else heard. 
>> UA0, KH0, E51PEN (S Cook Is) were easy on 80m and E51 (N Cook Is) was on 
>> 40m.
>>
>> Good Luck
>>
>> Jim
>> _______________________________________________
>> OKDXA mailing list
>> OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa
>
> _______________________________________________
> OKDXA mailing list
> OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa