[OKDXA] DX COPS AMD MALICIOUS QRM
Ken Case
caseke at cox.net
Sun Dec 3 19:18:01 EST 2006
Froggy and all,
I suspect we all agree about the malicious interference.
The OTHER one that has begun over the years and is now up to an art form is
EVERYBODY calling even when the DX station has identified someone and is in
QSO. That happens simplex (often understandably due to QRM), but also
split. I just cannot believe it when some DX station comes back K5XYZ 599
(for example) and then everybody up and down the band is calling at the same
time K5XYZ is trying to complete the QSO. Even when the DX station asks for
ONLY K5XYZ there are still many who are calling. UNFORTUNATELY, that is too
often the fault of the DX station who, in the interest of trying to appear
like an ultra-efficient multi-tasker, starts answering these guys instantly
after the preceding QSO. That sends the CLEAR message to everyone that the
way to get through to the DX is to continue calling at all times. Then, the
pileup gets out of control. It didn't use to be like that!
73 Ken K5KC
----- Original Message -----
From: <K8fu at aol.com>
To: <okdxa at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 10:13 AM
Subject: [OKDXA] DX COPS AMD MALICIOUS QRM
> It took me a bit to find the VU7 this am. So when I determined that I
> could
> hear him well enough to work, I turned on the amp. It was working fine
> last
> night and I gave Ed a Q in the contest. Turned it on this am immediately
> experienced a healthy dose of RF PMS.
>
> Luckily I was able to find the prob and repair it myself. By that time
> his
> sig was starting to drop. Then N1LID started calling CQ on his freq.
>
> When I started getting interested in DX and contesting, through my friend
> and neighbor Don K8MFO, I can't remember anything at all that compares to
> what
> is occurring today. I don't understand it.
>
> Hams have had a history of policing their own and with the epidemic of
> malicious interference escalating I am left wondering why there isn't
> some vehicle
> of enforcement initiated.
>
> I realize the FCC probably doesn't hv the money to put tracking and
> enforcement teams in the field, but why couldn't the ARRL organize
> voluntary regional
> teams to track and identify these deliberate and malicious stations.
>
> It's really getting to the point for me that chasing DX is no longer fun.
> It's hard enough to work places like Lakshadweep at the bottom of the
> sunspot
> cycle but to hv to endure operators calling on the dx calling freq and
> the
> malicious interference is leaving me frustrated and angry.
>
> It seems this phenomenon is not only confined to the US. I saw yest where
> euros were screaming for something to be done abt IT9RYH (I think) on
> 14.190.
>
> I sure would like to see someone like Sumner or Harrison take the bull by
> the horns and aggressively address this problem.
>
> The Ranting's and Musings of a Frustrated Frog.............
>
> Ribbit..........................Ribbit.......................... BOHICA
> _______________________________________________
> OKDXA mailing list
> OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa
More information about the OKDXA
mailing list