Hi Dom.

FYI, there has been an issue with new 7300s - HF RF output is well below the stated 100 watts. Icom has had over two dozen returned (incl. mine)
in the past 6 months. 

Caveat Emptor...

73 Martin

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:55 PM <ofarc-request@mailman.qth.net> wrote:
Send OFARC mailing list submissions to
        ofarc@mailman.qth.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ofarc
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        ofarc-request@mailman.qth.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
        ofarc-owner@mailman.qth.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of OFARC digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Ic 7300 vs FT 710 (Dominic Mazoch)
   2. Re: Ic 7300 vs FT 710 (Jeff Greer)
   3. Correction (Martin Denning)
   4. Re: Ic 7300 vs FT 710 (MLandress)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 01:08:09 GMT
From: "Dominic Mazoch" <domemt@juno.com>
To: ofarc@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [OFARC] Ic 7300 vs FT 710
Message-ID: <20230712.200809.29508.0@webmail05.vgs.untd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

OK. which is better?

7300 does 2/.70M

710 seems to have better sound filtering?

Suggestions?


Dominic Mazoch


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:52:42 +0000
From: Jeff Greer <greerjw@hotmail.com>
To: Dominic Mazoch <domemt@juno.com>, "ofarc@mailman.qth.net"
        <ofarc@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [OFARC] Ic 7300 vs FT 710
Message-ID:
        <SA3PR19MB758647FE61DE6A872CC8F814B537A@SA3PR19MB7586.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The Icom IC-7300 does not do 2m/70cm.  It does 160-6m.
________________________________
From: ofarc-bounces@mailman.qth.net <ofarc-bounces@mailman.qth.net> on behalf of Dominic Mazoch <domemt@juno.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 8:08 PM
To: ofarc@mailman.qth.net <ofarc@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [OFARC] Ic 7300 vs FT 710

OK. which is better?

7300 does 2/.70M

710 seems to have better sound filtering?

Suggestions?


Dominic Mazoch
______________________________________________________________
OFARC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ofarc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:OFARC@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to greerjw@hotmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/ofarc/attachments/20230713/d6a856ad/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:13:06 -0500
From: Martin Denning <morgancreek@gmail.com>
To: OFARC <ofarc@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [OFARC] Correction
Message-ID:
        <CAJc88FFhM0ka7j7PSpJYGajHr09fVzMZUOnZY=Df-uHa5MSTWw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi All

At the last weekly Net, I mistakenly stated that our next Club meeting @
Transtar would be 7/29.

This was incorrect - the next meeting is *Saturday 7/22 at Transtar.*

Apologies for any confusion caused.

73
Martin W5XUK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/ofarc/attachments/20230713/5959bc24/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:50:49 -0500
From: "MLandress" <gammamann@aol.com>
To: "'Jeff Greer'" <greerjw@hotmail.com>, "'Dominic Mazoch'"
        <domemt@juno.com>,      <ofarc@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [OFARC] Ic 7300 vs FT 710
Message-ID: <000f01d9b5c3$53eea820$fbcbf860$@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The 7300 is HF and 6m. Software defined.  Color display, waterfall, latest
technology, Tuner built in.

The 7100 is HF 6, 2 and 70cm Including DStar.  No tuner.  BW detachable
display, mobile or base.  This unit is going out of production but otherwise
serviceable.  Probably no firmware upgrades.

Both can take various Icom compatible tuners. 

They are about the same price more or less.  These are not really in the
same class. 

Compare specs on the Icom website. 

From: ofarc-bounces@mailman.qth.net [mailto:ofarc-bounces@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Jeff Greer
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 9:53 AM
To: Dominic Mazoch; ofarc@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [OFARC] Ic 7300 vs FT 710



The Icom IC-7300 does not do 2m/70cm.  It does 160-6m.

  _____ 

From: ofarc-bounces@mailman.qth.net <ofarc-bounces@mailman.qth.net> on
behalf of Dominic Mazoch <domemt@juno.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 8:08 PM
To: ofarc@mailman.qth.net <ofarc@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [OFARC] Ic 7300 vs FT 710



OK. which is better?

7300 does 2/.70M

710 seems to have better sound filtering?

Suggestions?


Dominic Mazoch
______________________________________________________________
OFARC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ofarc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:OFARC@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to greerjw@hotmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/ofarc/attachments/20230713/f14f953c/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OFARC mailing list
OFARC@mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ofarc


End of OFARC Digest, Vol 162, Issue 6
*************************************