Just in case anyone is interested; someone reached out to me today inquiring about my experience with a physically small HF antenna in a very limited urban setting.

Here are my comments.

Chris Cox, N0UK
[email protected]
https://www.credly.com/go/IR77aRbH2rFDdOiymuxu2w



Begin forwarded message:

From: "Chris Cox, N0UK" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: QST article
Date: December 16, 2022 at 19:52:59 CST
To: Mike Singer <[email protected]>

Hi, Mike.

I invested the MFJ 10-30m magnetic loop when we moved into an apartment in 2014.

Frankly, I am still rather astounded at just how well it plays given its physically small size.

For sure, it’s not a 3 element tribander but it does surprisingly well, especially on the higher bands.

I also have a 43 foot end-fed wire antenna that I use which is supported on a 20 foot fishing rod.  The loop usually performs better than the wire in head to head comparison - certainly when it comes to signal to noise ratio, but usually also on pure signal strength.

I do use the wire for 40 and even occasionally 80/160.

On the loop, I have worked the following on 30-10 metres.

Band DXCCs
30m 70
20m 150
17m 106
15m 128
12m 87
10m 114

Mostly CW, but some digital and SSB too, FT8 especially in the past couple of years.

I decided to accept the challenge of very limited HF antenna capacity when we moved from a house to an apartment and never expected to be able to do what I have been able to do.

So, if you’re forced into using a compromise HF antenna system, I would absolutely recommend magnetic loops- they do work unbelievably well - just don’t expect them to compare to a TH6DXX!

Chris Cox, N0UK
[email protected]
https://www.credly.com/go/IR77aRbH2rFDdOiymuxu2w



On Dec 16, 2022, at 19:29, Mike Singer <[email protected]> wrote:


Hi Chris, I see you in the QST article. I am currently reviewing the loop antennas due to a postage stamp size lot. I see you have one. Any feedback is appreciated.

--
Mike Singer
N6MJS

760-484-8257