[NLRS] Aurora report

[Rich Westerberg]

That was fun.  I had to jump out for a dinner engagement so I might've
missed some of the opening.

Best DX was only SWL.  Couldn't complete into FN42 or FN66 but heard them
lightly.  I did work into FN31 and FN36.  Heard someone on 144.210 that was
on SSB and was going from AU to a clear tone so I'm wondering if we were
close to Auroral E.  Had my beam almost due east for most of the long haul
stuff.  12 elements at 20 feet works OK!

I'll check back later.

Rich N0HJZ

On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 4:48 PM Jon Platt via NLRS <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
wrote:

> That was fun.  How long has it been for a good aurora event?   14 2m CW
> Qs, best DX was probably FN36 or FN21.  FN36 was a new grid too !   Called
> CQ on 222.100 a few times with no takers there.  Was watching all the
> really fuzzy 6m FT8 signals with not a single decode.
>
> Maybe watch for a redo later this evening or some 6m Es late tonight after
> a Wild victory.
>
> 73, Jon
> W0ZQ
> ______________________________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> Help: https://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/nlrs/attachments/20230423/352e524d/attachment.html>