[NLRS] FCC PETITION FOR RULEMAKING - Amendment to enable greater Commercial Use of the 10.0-10.5 GHz Band - Oct 04, 2002

[Jon Platt]

Hello NLRS land
>From the Midwest Microwave reflector.
73, JonW0ZQ


-----Original Message-----
From: David Petke via groups.io <david.petke=verizon.net at groups.io>
To: 10GHz-Up at groups.io; Midwest-Microwave at groups.io; RVHFG at groups.io; 'Packrats Reflector' <packrats at mailman.qth.net>; BRMS at groups.io
Cc: 'Tom Frenaye' <frenaye at pcnet.com>; OVHFA at groups.io; 'NEWS' <newsvhf at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tue, Nov 1, 2022 9:10 am
Subject: [Midwest-Microwave] FCC PETITION FOR RULEMAKING - Amendment to enable greater Commercial Use of the 10.0-10.5 GHz Band - Oct 04, 2002

<!--#yiv5898092193 _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv5898092193 #yiv5898092193 p.yiv5898092193MsoNormal, #yiv5898092193 li.yiv5898092193MsoNormal, #yiv5898092193 div.yiv5898092193MsoNormal {margin:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv5898092193 a:link, #yiv5898092193 span.yiv5898092193MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5898092193 p.yiv5898092193MsoPlainText, #yiv5898092193 li.yiv5898092193MsoPlainText, #yiv5898092193 div.yiv5898092193MsoPlainText {margin:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv5898092193 span.yiv5898092193EmailStyle17 {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv5898092193 span.yiv5898092193PlainTextChar {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv5898092193 .yiv5898092193MsoChpDefault {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;} _filtered {}#yiv5898092193 div.yiv5898092193WordSection1 {}-->https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/1004923311843  Folks.  I picked up this important 10 GHz note off the NEWSVHF Group reflector, started by Tom Frenaye K1KI, and amplified by Tom WA1MBA.  As Tom says below, “We have some work to do.”    Thanks to Tom and to Tom for alerting us.  Dave K1RZ  FM19jh    Tom,    Thanks for sharing this.  We have to take some action.  Note that in this petition for ruling there is an intended set-aside of5 MHz around 10,368 where supposedly there would be no operation of commercial gear. However, read it carefully.  1) There is an assumption that Amateur operation is predetermined and at specific locations, whereas much 10 GHz Amateur operation is sporadic and at unpredictable locations.  2) Furthermore, there is no limit on spurious emissions of the commercial gear which could interfere with those "protected" frequencies, and  3) furthermore, amateur stations often leak LO frequency signals, which fall inside the 10 to 10.5 allocation but will possibly cause interference with this proposed commercial point-to-point use.  4)  Also, because there is possibly 120 MHz channels, the avoidance of a5 MHz channel could be ignored when using 120 MHz channels, thereby causing direct interference.  We have work to do.  Tom WA1MBA  On 10/26/2022 11:58 AM, Tom Frenaye wrote:https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/search-filings/filing/1004923311843  73 Tom/K1KI _._,_._,_ 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/nlrs/attachments/20221101/aa8c1310/attachment.html>