[NLRS] [MWA] N0HJZ - CQWW VHF

[Ronald Bergantzel]

Hello  all . Let's try  this again  - Wyatt - well put , and truthful : thanks ..... been trying to  stay on the sidelines  but the incorrect statements  brought  me out ALSO - when the east coast digital  guys see your  anti digital  posts   some of your  QSOS  will go away : just sayin' . Let's  just all doing contesting the way we all see fit to and enjoy our hobby using the modes that we enjoy - been doing CW since the early  70s and there's  not as many CW ops nowadays either ( I was the only CW op at the local Field Day up here ) and I don't  plan on quitting  CW anytime  BUT WILL EMBRACE TECHNOLOGY  WHEN I CAN MAKE MORE QSOs ..... 73s  Ron KA0RYT 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:16 PM, Richard Clem<clem.law at usa.net> wrote:   >>>>>What about FSK441 and now MSK144? I don't recall this much talk about
digital in
VHF contesting when those modes were popular (and still are) Are those also
not
modes that use software for decoding?<<<<<

Speaking of digital modes and MSK144, I am calling CQ at this very moment
(Monday, 315 PM Central, 2015z) on MSK144 on 50.260.  I'm curious if this
thing is working, so if anyone happens to see this, I'd appreciate a reply.

Here's my take on digital modes.  I'm a relative newbie to digital modes.  I
did work all states in 2009 on PSK31 with a homemade interface (just a couple
of patch cords, with a manual switch to transmit).  That was to get the Triple
Play award, and then I kind of lost interest in digital modes.

I've been on a quest for 5BWAS, and the tough ones have been the close in
states on 15 and 10.  The activity seems to be on FT8 these days, so I had
Santa bring me a SignalLink USB last year, and I've been plugging away at it. 
I still have a few "easy" ones on 10, but the challenging ones I have left are
Iowa and North Dakota on 10, and North Dakota on 15.  It seems to me that the
easiest way to get those will be meteor scatter, and it looks like MSK144 will
be the best way to get them on meteor scatter.  

Since Christmas, I have 44 states worked on FT8.  The remaining six don't look
particularly difficult, but I've been spending most of my time on 15 and 10. 
Are these QSOs easier than CW or SSB?  Maybe a little bit.  Once I have the
radio tuned, I don't have to fiddle with the knob as much as I would for CW or
SSB.  But as a digital newbie (but as a ham for over 40 years), there is a
certain skill set involved.

Again, right now, I'm calling CQ (or maybe it's my computer that's calling
CQ).  I'm trying to bounce some RF off of random meteor trails, something I've
only done a few times in the past, and only by chance.  If this thing actually
works, then eventually I'll want to set up a sked with someone in Iowa or
North Dakota.  Will that be cheating on my 5BWAS because the computer is doing
the work?  Maybe a little bit, but I'll still take those QSOs and apply them
to my total.

73,
Rick W0IS

______________________________________________________________
NLRS mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html