[NLRS] What's the problem with UHF (& microwave) contesting?
Paul Husby
husby002 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 11 18:57:04 EST 2016
Back in the 80's when I was getting my multi-op station going, things
were really taking off all over. We had saved a slot at 222 (just had
to re-crystal from 220), a new band came in at 902, KK7B developed the
'no-tune' transverters, and W3HQT made them available to all by starting
up DEMI. Things were looking great!
Then we were given the "Limited Multioperator" category, and you could
field a competitive station with just 4 bands. At first, that at least
meant you needed 1296, but nowadays you wouldn't think of substituting
1296 for 222. So, forget the hassle and expense of anything for
902&up. Multiops can really drive activity in a region, and I know it
hurts that we don't have one around here these days. Always finding at
least one signal calling on a band makes a big difference. Multiops
take the lead, and if they aren't on the higher bands, why should the
little guy?
Then we got the "Limited Rover", and ditto to most of the above. Top it
off with the "3-Band Station", so you aren't even encouraged to get on
the fabulous 222 band. A station with 432 and not 222 is almost
ridiculous to fire up for the UHF Contest, since practically nobody
calls CQ on 432 anymore. And if you built up your multiop with nothing
above 432, then the UHF Contest isn't going to be a big thrill for you
either. So we have encouraged a collection of single-ops, multi-ops and
rovers that are discouraged from operating a UHF Contest.
The constant theory has been that these new categories increase activity
by encouraging stations with limited resources. It was never clear to
me that we were ever discouraging those stations! I don't think many
people seriously get on for the contests to collect the wallpaper or to
see their call higher up on a list. Heck, since the complete results
dropped out of QST, how many people ever actually look to see where they
ended up? I think most people get on just to have fun making contacts
on these rare occasions when activity is guaranteed.
If the changes we make don't result in more contacts on all bands, and
if they don't promote growing your station, then we are not headed in
the right direction. The demise of what was a very fun UHF Contest is
the most clear proof of that. The lagging activity in the September VHF
Contest is further evidence. Only the June contest is in good health,
and that thanks to the huge influx of HF contesters who found their new
radios all reach 6 meters.
One change that seems to be helping is the opening up of spotting and
internet chat forums. That is especially valuable on 222 & above, where
sharp antennas make it so difficult to find contacts randomly. Yet we
were barely given a chance to try it out, let alone develop it, in the
UHF Contest.
Gregg is right, we also need a simpler and less expensive means to reach
these bands. The technology is out there, but that is another subject.
73
Paul W0UC
More information about the NLRS
mailing list