[NLRS] 3400 vs 3456 MHz

[John Allen]

>Three years ago the ARRL recommended that terrestrial users of 
>3456 MHz move to 3400 MHz as time and resources permitted.

Does anyone know why the ARRL made this recommendation?

John K1AE

-----Original Message-----
From: NLRS [mailto:nlrs-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Arliss
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 4:22 PM
To: NLRS
Subject: [NLRS] 3400 vs 3456 MHz



Three years ago the ARRL recommended that terrestrial users of 
3456 MHz move to 3400 MHz as time and resources permitted, and I 
know that most EME operation on that band is around 3400 MHz. 
However, I am wondering if there has been any move in this region 
to 3400 MHz. In other words, if I buy a transverter for 9 cm, 
should it be set up for 3400 or 3456 MHz?

Thanks & 73,

Arliss  W7XU
______________________________________________________________
NLRS mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com