[NLRS] 3400 vs 3456 MHz

[Zack Widup]

As far as I know, the four of us in this area who are on that band have
made no move toward using 3400. My rig is still crystalled so 144.0 =
3456.0 MHz.

73, Zack W9SZ


On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Arliss <w7xu at w7xu.com> wrote:

>
>
> Three years ago the ARRL recommended that terrestrial users of 3456 MHz
> move to 3400 MHz as time and resources permitted, and I know that most EME
> operation on that band is around 3400 MHz. However, I am wondering if there
> has been any move in this region to 3400 MHz. In other words, if I buy a
> transverter for 9 cm, should it be set up for 3400 or 3456 MHz?
>
> Thanks & 73,
>
> Arliss  W7XU
> ______________________________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>