[NLRS] Is there published data on tree foliage ...
Donn, WA2VOI
wa2voi at mninter.net
Thu Jul 10 11:19:29 EDT 2014
'Morning, Chris.
No, the report doen't state "condition" of the foliage. From contest, however,
I assume it refers to "dry" foliage. The report treats each source of loss
seperately: i.e., atmospheric, water vapor, rain, scattering, etc. (The report
is aimed at mm wavelength propagation. The foliage loss equation just happens
to cover down to 200MHz.)
FWIW, I agree with you completely re: rain-covered foliage and TV signals. My
"look" at the Shoreview towers is blocked by a hill and I suffer badly from
multi-path. Dry conditions are... OK, but during and after rain, no so much.
73 Donn
WA2VOI/0
PS The FCC report is readily available on the Internet. (Where I got it
originally.) Don't rememebr exactly, but 'FCC OET Bulletin 70' in a search
engine should find it.
(dbb)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Elmquist" <chrise at pobox.com>
To: "Donn, WA2VOI" <wa2voi at mninter.net>
Cc: <NLRS at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [NLRS] Is there published data on tree foliage ...
>
>
> On Wednesday (07/09/2014 at 11:03PM -0500), Donn, WA2VOI wrote:
>>
>> This may help.
>>
>> Foliage loss
>> L(dB)= 0.2 * f^0.3 *R^0.6
>> where: f = MHz
>> R= depth of foliage (in meters)
>> Valid for 200 - 95,000 MHz
>> Depth of foliage R < 400m
>>
>> From:
>> CCIR Rpt 236-2
>> FCC OET Bulletin 70, July 1997
>
> That's interesting. Does it indicate whether that is dry or wet?
> or the worst case?
>
> Judging by attenuation of broadcast TV here, on say 600 MHz, wet trees
> are way worse than dry ones...
>
> Chris N0JCF
>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Smith via NLRS"
>> <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
>> To: <NLRS at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 2:51 AM
>> Subject: [NLRS] Is there published data on tree foliage ...
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >... absorption at 432 mHz?
>> >
>> >Any reference would be appreciated.
>> >
>> >Thank you es 73.
>> >
>> >Bill, W0WOI
>> >______________________________________________________________
>> >NLRS mailing list
>> >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>> >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> >Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>> >
>> >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> NLRS mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> --
> Chris Elmquist
> ______________________________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the NLRS
mailing list