[NLRS] 10 MHz frequency standards

tosca005 at umn.edu tosca005 at umn.edu
Wed Sep 16 20:13:13 EDT 2009


On Sep 16 2009, Donn - WA2VOI/0 wrote:

> An Rb will only put you within a few cycles (unless it, itself, is GPS 
> disciplined), and MAY increase the phase noise. 

Is this mis-typed, or do you mean within a few cycles of 10 MHz, or do you 
really mean within a few cycles of 10,368,000,000 Hz? ? ? I guess I am 
thrown by the use of the word "only" in this context, implying to me less 
than stellar accuracy, but maybe you mean tiny (minisculem, actually) 
inaccuracy?

> Rbs are also more 
> expensive and, as Bruce notes, DO have a finite life. Those we get 
> surplus could die tomorrow (or
>5 years from now... you don't know !).

I assumed the price would be much higher, but (a) surplus OCXO's seem less 
plentiful and more expensive now than they used to be, and (b) I was 
watching a Rb osc on eBay that was holding at an amazingly low price 
without any serious bids, so I put in a bid of $50 and with 1 day to go, it 
has only risen to $12 so far. Of course, the price could go anywhere up 
from there in 24 hours' time, but I figured what the heck, why not try, 
sometimes things go for dirt cheap? This model was apparently "designed for 
a 10-year life" so I see exactly what you mean about having an unknown life 
remainder on it. But even if it had a 1 year life remaining (90% used up), 
and I run it for 48 hours at a crack times 6 or 7 contest weekends per 
year, it will still take a while to use up that last year of life...

> The last issue is your i.f. radio's tuning accuracy. It doesn't do much 
> good to be on 10.368.100 000 +/-1 (Rb) if the i.f. radio is off by 150 Hz 
> (~1ppm) or 75 Hz (0.5ppm) and/or drifts like a bansee.

Much as I'd love, on principle, for 144.100 MHz to represent 10368.100 MHz, 
I'd be quite willing to settle for a known offset that is something else, 
but is constant. I have an HP frequency counter that has the high-stability 
ovenized oscillator and was calibrated against a cesium standard before 
sale to me, so I guess I can measure something that at least looks like 
10,368,000,000 Hz on the display with it, but of course even that 
oscillator must be subject to drift in the couple of years that I've owned 
it. There is a 10 MHz external reference input jack which, I suppose, could 
go to an even better standard reference to allow me to measure where the 
combination of transverter, disciplined LO, and IF radio all conspire to 
end up, and then write it down on a piece of tape stuck to the back of the 
dish... :)

Thanks for the input.
73 de WØJT


More information about the NLRS mailing list