[NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.

[Matt Arthur]

Hi Jon,

260 will work for me fine.

I think we should let people know we will be mooving the net.

some have memntioned the idea of buying the fire department a scanner the
problem is i am really thinking that there is more then one of these old
things out there.

I sure as hell don't want to get in the buying new scanners for the hole
town.
i am sure there at least two that are causing the problem.

I think 260 will be fine.
i say lets make the change the first week in June.
this will give us time to inform people of the change.
Thanks 73 Matt ka0pqw
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <w0zq at aol.com>
To: <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.


>
>
>
> Hello Matt and all. As I recall, back in the "old days", the SWOT 2m group
used 144.260 for nets. In the spirit of continuation, I would recommend
144.260 over 144.240. In addition, I think other nets around the country
also tend to use 144.260 .... perhaps for the same reason.
>
>
> 73, Jon
>
> W0ZQ
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html