[NLRS] Another thought about light QSO's

[Ray J]

think they better beef up the electronic detection portion of the rule..

I fail to see how using a camera to see a light source that is just 
outside the range of human vision should qualify for contest credit.. it 
is almost no different than looking at cw blinking flashlight.

w9Ray

Richard Clem wrote:
> 
> As I was looking through the Ramsey Electronics catalog last night, I realized
> that there is one extremely simple method of detecting light (or infrared
> LED's).  If you ever need to check the batteries in your TV remote control,
> and easy way to do so is to look at the LED With a digital camera.  
> 
> I suspect that it wouldn't be too difficult to make it visible a kilometer
> away.  So if an infrared LED is allowed with just one stage of electronic
> detection, then it would be pretty trivial to do CW QSO's with a TV remote
> control and cel phone camera.  I'm not sure how, but it seems to me that ought
> to be excluded from the definition, as having very little to do with amateur
> radio.
> 
> On the other hand, if it's not excluded, I would be very happy to hand out
> QSO's using a TV remote control, a flashlight, or even smoke signals (after
> all, that's just a system of modulating the ambient light).
> 
> 73,
> Rick W0IS
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 9.0.716 / Virus Database: 270.14.102/2556 - Release Date: 12/10/09 01:36:00
>