[NLRS] Yagi Spacing Q.. - MORE questions
John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK
hamk9jk at ameritech.net
Thu Oct 23 13:06:03 EDT 2008
Not to questions Jim's response...BUT, and _particular_ to Scott's
specific antennas.
Since the 124WB and A449-6S are end mounted designs...wouldn't there
be 'less' worry about such interaction with the mast and/or coax?
In Cushcraft (Laird?) pictures (with the antennas by themselves), they
are shown with a mast (presumably metal) only inches behind the
reflector.
ALSO, Cushcraft (Laird?) makes (made?) the A2706S and A27010S Dual
Band Yagis where elements are on the SAME boom, essentially 'minimal'
spacing between the two antennas.
So I guess my questions would be...
1. IS a "rear" mast out of the 'capture area' for the antenna or not?
2. Has anyone done an evalation of those Dual Band Yagis? How DO they
perform with, basically, TWO antennas on the same boom? Probably
seeking a "more thorough" assessment than "just" max. forward gain as
is typically done at conference antenna ranges, e.g. 'cleanliness' of
pattern, any "odd" nulls in the forward direction, and the like.
73, JK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Froemke" <jim.k0mhc at earthlink.net>
To: "'KB0NLY'" <kb0nly at mchsi.com>; "'NLRS'" <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:00
Subject: RE: [NLRS] Yagi Spacing Q.. - response
>
>
> Hi Scott
>
> For your application (vertical polarization) a bigger issue is the
> proximity of each antenna to the vertical metal mast. For best
> performance
> you'll want to keep the vertical metal mast OUTSIDE of the capture
> areas of
> both antennas. This means your horizontal spacing along your
> horizontal mast
> between each antenna and the vertical mast should be AT LEAST 1/2
> the
> diameter of each antenna's capture area.
>
> You could use a non conductive vertical mast (if it's strong enough)
> but when your coax makes a 90 degree angle to descend down the
> vertical mast
> it also becomes a vertical conductor located on the vertical mast
> between
> the two antennas so you'll still have this problem.
>
> 73, Jim
> K0MHC
>
> _______________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>
More information about the NLRS
mailing list