[NLRS] 6M operations at KTCA
Doug Reed
n0nas at amsat.org
Wed Nov 5 22:03:31 EST 2008
Now that you mention it, I do remember that comment about the down tilt
in the antenna..... That would have to effect the skip a bit....
73, Doug.
Clair J. Robinson wrote:
>
>
> Donn Baker - WA2VOI/0 wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Kent, WA5VJB, had a similar opprotunity in Dallas/Ft. Worth a couple
>> of years ago. They built a new Ch 2 station with antennas at the
>> 1800' level. The transmitter was delayed by several months so Kent
>> and gang had a reasonably good 6m antenna for that time. I'm pretty
>> sure they ended up with two or three cavitys (cavities ?) to keep the
>> other stuff out of the receiver and transmitter. They measured (with
>> a Bird wattmeter) about 8 watts coming back down the coax from the
>> other stations on the tower.
>>
>> It was apparently well worth the time and effort spent in getting it
>> working. They had lots of fun. We can ask him what they actually
>> had to do... it might save some time and effort here.
>>
>> 73 Donn
>> WA2VOI/0
>>
>
> I recall that Kent related that the antenna really sucked for Es due
> to the look down angle used to fill in the local area rather than
> shoot all the power at the horizon. He said that they could work
> mobiles a long way off, though.
>
> 73, CJ K0CJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>
>
More information about the NLRS
mailing list