[NLRS] LCRs for 2006 Sept ARRL
John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK
hamk9jk at ameritech.net
Mon Feb 5 15:01:25 EST 2007
Thanks for the 'heads up' from Vince and Nice Report for Matt.
I had a dupe that I knew about, but left it in and find that I was NOT
penalized for it, a first "personal" confirmation to that part of the
process working properly (and I had NOT counted the dupe in my
claimed).
My "bad" was a Not-In-Log where MY log has that I worked the station
on 144 and a few minutes later on 50. No "ding" for the 144 QSO (so
THAT must have been IN the other station's log) but, apparently, the
other station must not have thought we made it on 50 (or perhaps it
was mis-recorded) as the QSO on 50 is listed as a NIL for me.
When I can find the time, I'll do a "bang" of the claimed scores that
were released for the electronically received logs (I have 461 of
them) versus the Scores Database and see what kind of score changes
can be identified. I'm also curious if anyone sees anything that looks
like a systematic problem...like the few that were identified in the
June LCRs.
73, JK
More information about the NLRS
mailing list