[NLRS] Need your input - Rover Rules
w0zq at aol.com
w0zq at aol.com
Mon Apr 30 13:57:11 EDT 2007
Hello NLRS land.
As I announced during our NLRS business meeting at Aurora'07, the
ARRL's VHF/UHF Advisory Committee (VUAC) is currently discussing the
rover rules. As your Dakota Division representative, I would like to
ask each of you the following questions. Please feel free to forward
this to any other interested parties that I may have missed .... I will
tally data from all sources. Ask questions if you have any.
PLEASE RESPOND ONLY TO ME so that we do not clog up the reflector. I
promise to post a summary after I have collected all of your inputs.
73, Jon
W0ZQ
------ Start --------
Your Call:
Are you in the Dakota Division (Yes/No) ?
Please check one of the following four boxes:
( ) I have never roved and I'm not interested in it.
( ) I have never roved, but I have thought about trying it some
time.
( ) I rove on some occasions
( ) I rove often.
For the following questions please state your position using the
following scale (no, its not in dB). You can add comments if you
wish, or add them at the end - that's optional.
1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neither agree nor disagree (or, no opinion)
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree.
1. Do you think that captive roving is an issue in the Dakota
Division ? Captive roving is where a rover exclusively works one
station.
2. Do you think that the rules should be modified to support the
family rule for roving ? Currently, the General VHF Rules exclude
this.
3. Do you think that the rules should be modified to allow all
rovers to use APRS ? APRS contacts themselves would not count for
contest points.
4. Do you think that the rules should be modified to allow all
rovers to include a nonparticipating driver ? The suggested change is
aimed at safety.
5. Do you think that the rules should be changed to allow for a
limited rover class? A limited rover would follow the same rules as a
Rover, but would compete with no more than any four bands of their
choosing.
6. To address issues around team roving and grid circling, for the
rover and limited rover class, do you favor these proposed rules (vote
on each one)
a) For rover to rover contacts, for any given band, once a contact
has been made those two rovers may not make contact again from any
adjoining grid(s) for 30 minutes.
b) If a rover makes more than 300 contacts, no more than 50% of their
total can be made with other rovers.
7. As rules may be created to exclude, or significantly limit, grid
circling and team roving from the rover and limited rover class, do you
favor creating an unlimited rover category where these two rules would
NOT apply ? At this time, the suggestion is that the unlimited rover
scores would not be included in club scoring (but limited and rover
scores would).
Please provide me with any addition comments that you may have:
---- end -----
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at AOL.com.
More information about the NLRS
mailing list