[NLRS] W0ZQ/B 222.061 is back up.

Thu Mar 2 08:57:05 EST 2006

Thanks for the report John.   You are pretty close to the beacon.   Anyone
farther out had a chance to listen and if so, how is the signal quality ?

73, Jon
W0ZQ

             "John P. Toscano"                                             
             <tosca005 at tc.umn.                                             
             edu>                                                       To 
             Sent by:                  nlrs at mailman.qth.net                
             nlrs-bounces at mail                                          cc 
             man.qth.net                                                   
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [NLRS] W0ZQ/B 222.061 is back   
             03/01/06 09:00 PM         up.                                 

W0ZQ at aol.com wrote:
>
> The 222.061 beacon is running again.    I pushed on the "L" in the LC, so
it
> may be closer to 222.060 after it  stabilizes.   Please check it out over
the
> next few days and let me  know if you detect any weakness in signal or
poor
> tone quality.

Stronger signal since the repairs, seems about the same strength as
usual.  Frequency does indeed seem to be a little lower.

The big difference that I hear is the tone of the signal.  It does not
sound like a sinewave single-frequency tone any more.  It has a
distinctly raspy or buzzy sound to it, sort of like a square wave or
triangle wave instead of a sine wave.

John (W0JT), EN34js
_______________________________________________
NLRS mailing list
NLRS at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs