[NLRS] Question on use of 144.200

[Brad Johannes]

10-4 over and out... <beep>

Sorry I'm a little slow on the irony...



>From: "Chris Cox, N0UK" <chrisc at BritishCarAndDriver.Com>
>To: Brad Johannes <bradjrc at hotmail.com>
>CC: nlrs at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: Re: [NLRS] Question on use of 144.200
>Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:41:56 -0500 (CDT)
>
>Unless I am MUCH mistaken, Mr. Elmquist after many years of zen meditation 
>has attained the very English trait of IRONY - no mean feat for a Colonial 
>Chap :-)
>
>Very well done Chris!
>
>I got it anyway...
>
>On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Brad Johannes wrote:
>>Huh?
>>
>>copy and paste from arrl:
>>"144.200 National calling frequency"
>>
>>If no one is calling, what would you be hearing on this "receive-only 
>>channels"?
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>144.200 is worth protecting.  It is one of the very few receive-only
>>>channels that we have in the amateur service...
>>>
>>>--
>>>Chris Elmquist NØJCF
>>>mailto:chrise at pobox.com
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NLRS mailing list
>>NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>>