[NLRS] Question on use of 144.200

Wed Jun 21 15:31:41 EDT 2006

Sorry.. I should have put a smiley at the end.

But you did indeed discover my point.

Chris 

On Wednesday (06/21/2006 at 02:28PM -0500), Brad Johannes wrote:
> 
> 
> Huh?
> 
> copy and paste from arrl:
> "144.200 National calling frequency"
> 
> If no one is calling, what would you be hearing on this "receive-only 
> channels"?
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >144.200 is worth protecting.  It is one of the very few receive-only
> >channels that we have in the amateur service...
> >
> >--
> >Chris Elmquist N?JCF
> >mailto:chrise at pobox.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs

-- 
Chris Elmquist
mailto:chrise at pobox.com