[NLRS] 10368 transverter
Dr. Gerald N. Johnson
geraldj at ispwest.com
Sat Feb 18 15:20:21 EST 2006
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 10:37 -0600, Doug Reed wrote:
>
<SNIP>
> If you put an RF attenuator after your IF radio you can do the same
> thing using it as the signal source in CW mode. Just watch the power
> dissipation of the attenuator. You should probably put a 6dB or 10dB pad
> ahead of the variable attenuator, just to be safe. If you don't have a
> good fixed pad, try 100-200 feet of cheap RG-58 coax.....
Better if its expensive RG-58, then it won't leak as much through the
braid, it will still have plenty of transmission loss. RG-174 has a lot
more loss per hundred at 2m and is more compact.
>
> If you don't have a good variable attenuator to use, you can get some of
> the benefit of variable signal level by connecting a 1 KHz sinewave
> audio signal generator into the mike input while in SSB mode and running
> that signal up and down. But don't expect more than 30-40dB of signal
> level difference because there is some amount of carrier and sideband
> leakage.
>
> I suggest using a 200:1 resistor attenuator at the mike input so the
> audio generator can run in its normal 0-10 volt range. Use 100 ohms
> across the mike input and 10K to 50K in series to the generator. This
> will help eliminate hum and noise from the audio leads but will NOT
> eliminate ground loops.
Only 200:1? 10 volts down to a millivolt takes 10,000:1... Only carbon
mike inputs needed a volt, dynamic/electret microphones run below a
millivolt output.
>
> Combining the audio generator and fixed or variable RF attenuators would
> allow you to cover a fairly wide range of signal levels, within the
> limits Jerry mentioned.
>
> I expect that one of these ideas is what DEM had in mind.
>
> 73, Doug Reed, N0NAS.
--
73, Jerry, K0CQ,
All content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer
More information about the NLRS
mailing list