[NLRS] Log Checking Reports
Dave Aho - N9TTX
n9ttx at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 21 04:00:24 EST 2006
As far as N4BH goes, it seems that the majority of
those that have noted their Q with him all have the
same grid recieved from him as opposed to what he
claimed he sent. One would think if that showed up in
their log checking...from various sources from various
grids, that the many people with that EM95 grid would
get the points and mults, and severely ding his score
for the wrog grid. If this is the case I wonder what
his score is? Zero?? if he sent his log in as from
FN31. Phone or CW the two grids don't sound much
alike at all for confusion of such. At least the
LCR's are available. Now to get the robots at the log
checking to think a bit more.
Dave...N9TTX (I have yet to look at my LCR)
--- Mike King - KM0T <scsueepe at mtcnet.net> wrote:
>
>
> I too feel this is helpful, I was very surprised
> when I saw mine, but now
> that Jon showed his, I dont feel so bad, so here are
> the errors of my
> way...(thanks Jon for going first :)
>
> ARVHFJUN-2006
> Call: KM0T
> Category: SINGLE-OP ALL HIGH
> ARRL Section: IA
>
> *** Summary ***
>
> 493 raw QSO before duplicate removal and
> checking reductions
> 483 net QSO after duplicate removal and
> checking reductions
> 483 net QSO points after checking
> 142 net multipliers after checking
> 68586 final score
>
> 2 (0.4%) duplicates
> 2 (0.4%) calls copied incorrectly
> 2 (0.4%) exchanges copied incorrectly
> 2 (0.4%) not in log
> 6 (1.2%) calls unique to this log only
>
> *** Not In Log ('N') ***
>
> N 50 PH 2006-06-10 1939 KM0T EN13 WA1KKO
> EN74
> N 50 PH 2006-06-11 0011 KM0T EN13 K8TQK
> EM89
>
> *** Incorrectly Copied Callsign ('B') ***
>
> YOUR LOG B 50 PH 2006-06-10 2355 KM0T EN13
> VE3KVG FN25
> HIS LOG G 50 PH 2006-06-10 2355 VE3CVG FN25
> KM0T EN13
>
> YOUR LOG B 50 PH 2006-06-11 0018 KM0T EN13
> KD2BSR EM79
> HIS LOG G 50 PH 2006-06-11 0018 KD8BSR EM79
> KM0T EN13
>
> *** Incorrect Exchange Information ('X') ***
>
> YOUR LOG X 50 PH 2006-06-10 1828 KM0T EN13
> KN4SM FM19
> HIS LOG G 50 PH 2006-06-10 1828 KN4SM FM16
> KM0T EN13
>
> YOUR LOG X 50 PH 2006-06-11 0043 KM0T EN13
> N4BH EM95
> HIS LOG G 50 PH 2006-06-11 0043 N4BH FN31
> KM0T EN13
>
> Boy I dont know how I blew this last one EM95 verses
> FN31, that is certainly
> a stretch!
>
> As for the not in log stuff, have no idea
> here...K8TQK is Bob. I know him
> and If I did not work him, he sure would not be in
> the log...as for the
> other guy, too long ago to remember, I suppose he
> must have not logged it
> for some reason.
>
> Good feedback, or bad feedback, depending on how you
> look at it.
>
> I think for me at least, my contacts were all 6
> meters during the monster
> opening...I worked no other bands in June and was
> using my vertical antenna.
> With all the QRM and commotion, QSO rate and
> multiple stations at the same
> time, I would expect something to be amiss, but I
> was surprised at how much
> actually was tagged.
>
> 73 to all and Merry Christmas
>
> Mike- KM0T
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <W0ZQ at aol.com>
> To: <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 1:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [NLRS] Log Checking Reports
>
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the heads-up Vince. For those who
> may not be familiar with
> > this
> > excellent source of feedback, its basically tells
> you what you may have
> > logged wrong and areas that may need improving.
> I have my W0ZQ/R file
> > cut &
> > pasted below (I shortened it up). Looks like my
> most common error was
> > copying
> > calls wrong along with a few blown grids. Good
> stuff to look at and
> > learn
> > from.
> >
> > 73, Jon
> >
> >
> > ARVHFJUN-2006
> > Call: W0ZQ
> > Category: ROVER
> > ARRL Section: MN
> >
> > *** Summary ***
> >
> > 535 raw QSO before duplicate removal and checking
> reductions
> > 527 net QSO after duplicate removal and checking
> reductions
> > 950 net QSO points after checking
> > 138 net multipliers after checking
> > 131100 final score
> >
> > 0 (0.0%) duplicates
> > 3 (0.6%) calls copied incorrectly
> > 2 (0.4%) exchanges copied incorrectly
> > 1 (0.2%) not in log
> > 2 (0.4%) calls unique to this log only
> >
> > *** Not In Log ('N') ***
> >
> > .N 50 PH 2006-06-10 1848 W0ZQ EN35
> N8UM EM76
> >
> > *** Incorrectly Copied Callsign ('B') ***
> >
> > YOUR LOG B 50 PH 2006-06-10 1925 W0ZQ
> EN35 K3KWH EN90
> > HIS LOG G 50 PH 2006-06-10 1925 W3KWH
> EN90 W0ZQ EN35
> >
> > YOUR LOG B 144 PH 2006-06-10 2222 W0ZQ
> EN25 WA2AUY FN23
> > HIS LOG G 144 PH 2006-06-10 2222 WA2AEY
> FN23 W0ZQ EN25
> >
> > YOUR LOG B 50 PH 2006-06-11 0102 W0ZQ
> EN24 W5PI EM00
> > HIS LOG G 50 PH 2006-06-11 0101 K5PI
> EM00 W0ZQ
> > EN24
> >
> >
> > *** Incorrect Exchange Information ('X') ***
> >
> > YOUR LOG X 50 PH 2006-06-10 1902 W0ZQ EN35
> NG4C FM06
> > HIS LOG G 50 PH 2006-06-10 1902 NG4C
> FM16 W0ZQ EN35
> >
> > YOUR LOG X 50 PH 2006-06-10 1934 W0ZQ EN35
> NG2T FN21
> > HIS LOG G 50 CW 2006-06-10 1933 NG2T
> FN23 W0ZQ EN35
> >
> > -- end --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NLRS mailing list
> > NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>
> _______________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>
I modulate, therefore I am!
...73, and all that jazz,
Dave...N9TTX
Always remember: "It could be worse.....it could be raining."
Marty Feldman from "Young Frankenstein"
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the NLRS
mailing list