[NLRS] Contest error report

[Charlie Betz]

OK, first a confirmation on N4BH.  Either N4BH screwed up or the ARRL checking software messed something up, becasue N9ISN, KM0T and now myself all got flagged for the same mistake.  No way all three of us copied FN31 as EM95.

Now, looking at my report, I am confused:  According to the following summary, I had 3 QSOs removed (828 raw vs. 825 net), yet the second set of info says I had 3 duplicates and 2 incorrect exchanges.  Since when does 3 + 2 = 3??    I understand why the 2 incorrect exchanges were deducted, but which one of the three dupes did they actually remove?  The other thing is I use CT, which supposedly reports dupes, so how could I have duplicate entries?  If I really did, why did they not list them?

Charlie, N0AKC



ARVHFJUN-2006
Call: N0AKC
Category: SINGLE-OP ALL HIGH
ARRL Section: WI

*** Summary ***

     828 raw QSO before duplicate removal and checking reductions
     825 net QSO after duplicate removal and checking reductions
     913 net QSO points after checking
     216 net multipliers after checking
  197208 final score

       3 (0.4%) duplicates
       0 (0.0%) calls copied incorrectly
       2 (0.2%) exchanges copied incorrectly
       0 (0.0%) not in log
      12 (1.4%) calls unique to this log only

*** Incorrect Exchange Information ('X') ***

Lines beginning with the letter 'X' are judged to have incorrectly copied 
exchange information. This means we have the other station's log, and the 
exchange sent by the other station does not match the exchange recorded in 
your log. This QSO is removed from your log with no additional penalty. 
For reference, the matching QSO from the other station is printed below this 
line with the first letter 'G'. 

YOUR LOG X   50 PH 2006-06-10 1844 N0AKC        EN44 N4BH         EM95
 HIS LOG G   50 PH 2006-06-10 1843 N4BH         FN31 N0AKC        EN44

YOUR LOG X   50 PH 2006-06-11 2153 N0AKC        EN44 K6KLY        CM97
 HIS LOG G   50 PH 2006-06-11 2152 K6KLY        CM87 N0AKC        EN44