[NLRS] W0ZQ report: 10gig 1st weekend (long)
W0ZQ at aol.com
W0ZQ at aol.com
Mon Aug 22 21:09:47 EDT 2005
5:00 AM comes early on a Saturday morning. I was wheel's up by about 5:30
AM with a mug of coffee and listening on 146.46. Sure enough, in a few
minutes, there was WA2VOI/W0JT and W0AUS/N0NAS on .46, all of us admiring the
beautiful full moon as it set over the ground fog that was slowly lifting.
Gosh, its fun to be a ham radio operator.
Our 10gig rover group; W9FZ, WB0LJC, WA2VOI, W0JT, W0AUS, N0NAS, and W0ZQ
converged on Hutchinson, MN at 7:30 AM. At the same time N0KP, N0UK, K0SHF,
KC0IYT, KD0JI, WB0VHF, and KC0IJB were converging on top of the ridge in
Sisseton (SD) while W0GHZ, K0FQA, WA0SSN, KC0P and N0HZO were arriving on the
hill just east of Lonsdale, MN. The goal of our rover group was to work the
fixed groups at Sisseton and Lonsdale, then move ten miles (or more) and repeat
the process. Our strategy was to move south out of Hutchinson and then
move as need in order to keep signals strong enough to maintain SSB QSOs. CW
provides greater range (for weaker signals) but at a significantly reduced
rate. The good news was that it was a good plan .... the bad news was that we
have never tried this before. Was it going to be endless fun or a bust ?
The short answer is that it was endless fun. Below you can see our
results. The distances are in km computed using BD-2004.
On Saturday, after stop # 3, we decided that signals with Sisseton were
starting to get marginal for SSB. Per plan we decided to stop moving south
(which was increasing the distance) and instead started to first move west then
back north to close the range. While this did increase the range to Lonsdale
we were still closer to them and their signals were strong.
Saturday night found us in Redwood Falls at dusk, pretty tired, but enjoying
the buffet at Jackpot Junction.
Sunday AM came way too early. By 7:00 AM we were at it again (did I say
its fun to be a ham, what a great hobby). The plan was for the Lonsdale
group (EN34hl) to move to Vasa (EN34pm). Vasa is east of Lonsdale by about 40
to 50 km, thus the distances were greater on Sunday. The Sisseton group moved
from EN15kp to EN15ll.
A quick beacon for Sisseton resulted in no response so we ran with K0AWU for
about 20 minutes with nothing heard either way. I think this path was over
500 km so its no surprise, but if it was going to happen without RS it was
going to be in the early morning. At around 7:20 AM we hooked up with Vasa
for the first time and work them with good signals. With the dish on Vasa,
bearing of about 87 degrees, I heard N0UK in Sisseton calling me (their
bearing was 307 degrees) off the back of my dish ... QRM on 10.368.100 !
With the Sisseton group so strong we decided to head south out of Redwood
Falls in order to open up the distance (more points). You can see the
distance going up from Sunday #1 to # 5 where once again we decided to move north to
bring the distance back down.
During the weekend we were able to pretty successfully run on two 10gig
frequencies simultaneously. This really helped with the overall QSO rate as we
did not have to wait for everyone in the rover group to work everyone in one
fixed group before we started to work the second fixed group. There were a
few times when we had desensing problems, but when they did occur we worked
around it. Also, by working two frequencies, we could free up a couple of
operators more quickly, and this released them to start to search for the next
stop.
Speaking of stops that was one of the more challenging aspects .... finding
a spot that had a shot to both Sisseton and Lonsdale/Vasa and that was
reasonably safe. We learned to appreciate soybeans and dislike corn. Having a
couple of rovers who could spread out after passing through 10 miles was a
considerable help. We (ok, me) did messed up at the very last stop on Sunday
where I tried to run east to open up the distance with Sisseton only to run
into a well foliaged lake at around 8 miles (that was the delay late on Sunday
between stops # 11 and # 12 ... getting around the !!&%$# lake ).
In closing, I think that the weekend was a success. We were able to show
that 150 to 240 km paths are consistently doable using only SSB and that
split frequencies can speed up throughput. I have over 270 QSOs. I know
that I heard EN15 "lucky Larry" and EN34 "pet monkey" in my sleep ! The rover
team concept worked great ..... there was once or twice where the rovers got
to far apart from each other, but we recognized this and made sure it didn't
happen again ..... we learned as we roved. We also tried to keep the last
guy on the appropriate dish heading until the next guy arrived & got set-up
so that we could hand off the link to them .... this didn't happen all the
time, but most the time.
The highlight of the contest for me ? Watching W0AUS fix his 10gig
transverter by delivering a sharp blow to its under side .... kind of like the Fonz
elbowing the jukebox.
73, Jon
W0ZQ
Saturday EN15kp EN34hl
# 1 EN24tu 233 90
# 2 EN24tr 239 84
# 3 EN24tn 248 80
# 4 EN24ro 234 94
# 5 EN24ql 236 99
# 6 EN24po 223 107
# 7 EN24pr 216 109
# 8 EN24pv 207 115
# 9 EN24nw 193 129
# 10 EN24lx 179 142
# 11 EN24lt 188 137
# 12 EN24mr 198 129
# 13 EN24mo 206 127
# 14 EN24kl 204 139
Sunday EN15ll EN34pm
# 1 EN24kl 188 192
# 2 EN24kh 199 194
# 3 EN24ke 209 196
# 4 EN24jb 214 206
# 5 EN24lb 223 193
# 6 EN24ne 224 177
# 7 EN24nh 215 174
# 8 EN24pi 223 160
# 9 EN24pl 215 159
# 10 EN24pp 206 159
# 11 EN24ps 200 161
# 12 EN24rt 210 149
--- end ---
More information about the NLRS
mailing list