[NLRS] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited

[goverby@charter.net]

Bruce Richardson (w9fz) wrote:
> The only SAD ommission is an FM only category.  Sure, I know
> it's just a mode, but it represents a huge universe of
> operators.  Categories attempt to keep level playing fields
> within certain broad types.  Well a three band FM only can't
> really compete against the three band NarrowBand guy.

I've also been a proponent of an FM only category, and I think I wrote that in
a reply to the recent survey.  I think Bruce stumbled into a rule that tips
it's hand towards the ARRL's vision for the future of ham radio.  That
universe of operators Bruce speaks of is today's horde of Technicians [like
me] who've bought dual-band *FM* mobile radios and we want to lure them into
contesting.

Well, why did we choose an FM dual band radios?  Because most sideband radios
are "HF" rigs (with VHF & UHF) and the dual bander is cheaper -- why pay for
bands you can't use?  With the New Ham having HF access, rigs like the ic706*
and ft100* will be more prominent as an "entry level" rig than they are today.

Glen, KC0IYT