[NLRS] Fw: IC-820H/IC-706MKiiGHas

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:07:11 -0500

You did not indicate your primary use ...... satellite, vhf weak signal,
HF, etc ?      My thoughts are that the FT100 may have a somewhat better
receiver than the 706 ..... however the general coverage receiver ranges
are different, so again, it depend on what you want/need.    Both the FT100
and 706 have HF/VHF/UHF capability while I believe the 820 is more aimed at
satellite work (?).

73, Jon
W0ZQ

                    "Jeanette Ramey"                                                                                  
                    <jramey@baldwin-te      To:     "NLRS Northern Lights Radio Society" <[email protected]>       
                    lecom.net>              cc:     (bcc: Jon C. Platt/US-Corporate/3M/US)                            
                                            Subject:     [NLRS] Fw: IC-820H/IC-706MKiiGHas                            
                    05/01/02 10:38 PM                                                                                 
                    Please respond to                                                                                 
                    "Jeanette Ramey"                                                                                  

Subject: IC-820H/IC-706MKiiGHas

> Has any one had any experience using ether the Icom IC-820H or a
> IC-706MKIIG?  Do ether of the radios have RX's good for use as a base
radio
> station for SSB/CW?  Is one better than the other, if so,  how and why?
> Or should I be looking at a different radio for use as my primary home
> station for 2M and 432?
>
> Paul A. Ramey
> WG0G/9
> 715-265-7288
> 612-747-1244
>

_______________________________________________
NLRS mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs