[NJARC] Rider's Schematics

[Jim Whartenby]

Well if that's the cause of my fuzzy vision then LASIK is out!  <grin>Jim I wonder why people argue over the 10% of their differences and ignore the 90% they agree on?

      From: David Sica <davesica at gmail.com>
 To: Al Klase <ark at ar88.net>; NJARC <njarc at mailman.qth.net> 
 Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 8:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [NJARC] Rider's Schematics
   
If these are the "newer" 600 dpi scans, I have a set of those and in my opinion they're only marginally better than the original 300 dpi scans. The problem is that many of the original printed pages (I have those too) are the analog resolution equivalent of well under 300 dpi and you can't create detail by scanning at higher resolutions. I like to scan from the book at high resolution and print out each page blown up to cover four sheets of paper. Some of the text is often still unreadably fuzzy but it does seem to help me with my guessing.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 4:02 PM Aaron Hunter <ahunter01 at comcast.net> wrote:

Just remember
Reply = Poster
Reply All = Everyone

_________________________________________________________
Al

Have you tried this site.  I've downloaded the manuals and they seem to 
be clear.   Let me know what you think.

http://www.nucow.com/allriders.htm

Aaron


On 8/3/2018 2:48 PM, Al Klase wrote:
> Just remember
> Reply = Poster
> Reply All = Everyone
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Gang,
>
> I've been depending upon Nostalgia Air 
> (http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Resources/) for schematics for some time 
> now.  They're handy, and there is a good index to find things. 
> However, I often find myself digging out, and scanning the original 
> paper copies, as the N/A scans aren't really clear.
>
> I tried American Radio History yesterday, but access is more 
> cumbersome, and the quality is about the same as N/A.
>
> Has anyone tried KE3GK's offering?
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/Riders-Perpetual-Troubleshooters-Manual-Vols-1-23-DVD-600dpi-PDF-KE3GK-/200286574170 
>
>
> For 20 bucsk I think it would be a good deal if his scans are anywhere 
> as good as mine.  We could put a set in the RTM shop.
>
> Any other suggestions?  First hand experience only.
>
> Al
>

______________________________________________________________
NJARC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Just remember
Reply = Poster
Reply All = Everyone

_________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
NJARC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/private/njarc/attachments/20180804/71a89aff/attachment.html>