From trainbee at aol.com Thu Jun 2 17:20:19 2016 From: trainbee at aol.com (TrainBee) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:20:19 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Fwd: [NEARC_Radio] Grille Cloth [1 Attachment] In-Reply-To: <1046988612.3873146.1464877123547.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1046988612.3873146.1464877123547.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1046988612.3873146.1464877123547.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <15512fd0282-6ae5-25a4@webprd-m60.mail.aol.com> Can anyone help identify this grille cloth? Thank you. Joe Devonshire -----Original Message----- From: James Ligouri n1qly at yahoo.com [NEARC_Radio] To: NEARC_Radio Sent: Thu, Jun 2, 2016 10:19 am Subject: [NEARC_Radio] Grille Cloth [1 Attachment] Acquired this length of grille cloth over 25 years ago from a woman whose husband opened a radio repair shop circa 1928. The cloth is original and appears to be silk. Unable to associate the design with a particular make/model antique radio. Measures approximately 36 x 24 inches. Can anyone identify this grille cloth? __._,_.___ View attachments on the web Posted by: James Ligouri Reply via web post ? Reply to sender ? Reply to group ? Start a New Topic ? Messages in this topic (1) Check out the automatic photo album with 1 photo(s) from this topic. Have you tried the highest rated email app? With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage. VISIT YOUR GROUP ? Privacy ? Unsubscribe ? Terms of Use . __,_._,___ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IMG_1834.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 2931160 bytes Desc: not available URL: From trainbee at aol.com Tue Jun 7 15:18:30 2016 From: trainbee at aol.com (TrainBee) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:18:30 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Fwd: [NEARC_Radio] Help with WWII Aircraft Bombing Instrumentation [9 Attachments] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1552c4d421b-5016-68a5@webprd-m33.mail.aol.com> Can anyone help Bruce? Joe Devonshire -----Original Message----- From: radioorphanage at comcast.net [NEARC_Radio] To: NEARC_Radio Sent: Tue, Jun 7, 2016 1:44 pm Subject: [NEARC_Radio] Help with WWII Aircraft Bombing Instrumentation [9 Attachments] Does anyone in the group know anything about WWII Aircraft Bombing Instrumentation, or know someone who does? Attached are pictures of 3 pieces. The smallest on the left is a Sperry Gyroscope with servo tuning. Appears to have something missing in the center of the Gyro The center piece is a Galvin Receiver- Trans RT39/APG-5Radar Gun Turret Receiver The right piece is a Bombing computer MK20 mod 2 CP-15A/ASG-10 (for Bomb Director MK-1) Any insights, values, or contacts to someone who might know these would be appreciated. Email or call 603 772 7516 Bruce Phillips __._,_.___ View attachments on the web Posted by: radioorphanage at comcast.net Reply via web post ? Reply to sender ? Reply to group ? Start a New Topic ? Messages in this topic (1) Check out the automatic photo album with 9 photo(s) from this topic. Have you tried the highest rated email app? With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage. VISIT YOUR GROUP New Photos 45 ? Privacy ? Unsubscribe ? Terms of Use . __,_._,___ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: P6070024.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 83913 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: P6070020.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 88261 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: P6070016.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 86563 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: P6070017.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 88620 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: P6070019.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 85601 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: P6070021.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 87182 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: P6070023.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 86368 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: P6070022.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 84387 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: P6070018.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 87387 bytes Desc: not available URL: From radiorich at prodigy.net Tue Jun 7 21:38:59 2016 From: radiorich at prodigy.net (RICHARD LEE) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 01:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NJARC] June 10th Meeting at Princeton References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Greetings Fellow Enthusiasts!? Just a reminder that the NJARC June 10th meeting will be held this Friday, at Bowen Hall, Princeton U. The agenda includes talks by V.P. Sal Brisindi...all you want to know about capacitor nomenclature.... and webmaster Dave Sica speaking on a resent break-through in CRT rebuilding...a small auction will follow.? See you all there!? Richard Lee., Pres. NJARC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.b.magoun at ieee.org Wed Jun 8 12:18:21 2016 From: a.b.magoun at ieee.org (Alex Magoun) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:18:21 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] ICYMI Vacuum tubes are the new transistors Message-ID: Research at Cal Tech suggests that vacuum tubes--really, really small vacuum tubes--may solve the growing logjam as Moore's Law approaches absolute limits: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/06/technology/smaller-chips-may-depend-on-technology-from-grandmas-radio.html?_r=0 . Alex ~~~ Alexander B. Magoun, Ph.D., Outreach Historian IEEE History Center Samuel C. Williams Library 3rd Floor Stevens Institute of Technology 1 Castle Point Terrace Hoboken NJ 07030-5991 USA +1 732-981-3414 a.b.magoun at ieee.org www.ethw.org @IEEEHistory www.ieee.org/history_center IEEE - Advancing Technology for Humanity -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dave.sica at njarc.org Wed Jun 8 12:27:46 2016 From: dave.sica at njarc.org (David Sica) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:27:46 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] The Ballad of Reginald Fessenden Message-ID: No matter on which side of the Fessenden or Sarnoff (or Marconi/Tesla) controversies you stand, you'll probably enjoy this song: https://soundcloud.com/parkranger777/01-track-01 (Found via Facebook) -- Dave Sica -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n4fs at eozinc.com Wed Jun 8 13:41:49 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:41:49 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] ICYMI Vacuum tubes are the new transistors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <028c01d1c1ad$0975c0b0$1c614210$@eozinc.com> It has been my understanding that Moore's law has already been exceeded by using 3 dimensions. - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Alex Magoun Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 12:18 PM To: njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: [NJARC] ICYMI Vacuum tubes are the new transistors Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From cpaci1 at verizon.net Thu Jun 9 14:55:01 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 14:55:01 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] June 10th Meeting at Princeton In-Reply-To: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Does anyone know what a good equivalent replacement transistor would be for a ?Bendix 660032?? It?s one of those metal quarter-size transistors - circa 1973. I?m working on a KX-60 Allied Knight kit - 50 watt solid-state stereo amplifier and found two of them (one shorted & one open) in the power supply circuit. I believe they are being used as rectifiers. Any info would be much appreciated! Thanks, Chuck AC2DP From: RICHARD LEE Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 9:38 PM To: Reflector Subject: [NJARC] June 10th Meeting at Princeton Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Greetings Fellow Enthusiasts! Just a reminder that the NJARC June 10th meeting will be held this Friday, at Bowen Hall, Princeton U. The agenda includes talks by V.P. Sal Brisindi...all you want to know about capacitor nomenclature.... and webmaster Dave Sica speaking on a resent break-through in CRT rebuilding...a small auction will follow. See you all there! Richard Lee., Pres. NJARC -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DSCF0059-2.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 289494 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ark at ar88.net Fri Jun 10 03:32:13 2016 From: ark at ar88.net (Al Klase) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:32:13 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Chuck, 660032 is probably a house number applied to transistors sold specifically to Allied (Knight). The early Bendix products were likely PNP Germanium transistors. Are they in TO-3 packages similar to this drawing? Do you have a schematic for the amp? I couldn't find anything on the web. To repair this thing you'll have to reverse engineer it. Not for beginners. The early solid state amplifiers had all sort of problems, and most sounded terrible even when working properly. Good luck, Al Al Klase ? N3FRQ Jersey City, NJ http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ On 6/9/2016 2:55 PM, Chuck wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > > Does anyone know what a good equivalent replacement transistor would > be for a ?Bendix 660032?? > It?s one of those metal quarter-size transistors - circa 1973. > I?m working on a KX-60 Allied Knight kit - 50 watt solid-state stereo > amplifier and found two of them (one shorted & one open) in the power > supply circuit. > I believe they are being used as rectifiers. > Any info would be much appreciated! > Thanks, > Chuck > AC2DP > *From:* RICHARD LEE > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 07, 2016 9:38 PM > *To:* Reflector > *Subject:* [NJARC] June 10th Meeting at Princeton > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Greetings Fellow Enthusiasts! Just a reminder that the NJARC June > 10th meeting will be held this Friday, at Bowen Hall, Princeton U. The > agenda includes talks by V.P. Sal Brisindi...all you want to know > about capacitor nomenclature.... and webmaster Dave Sica speaking on a > resent break-through in CRT rebuilding...a small auction will follow. > See you all there! Richard Lee., Pres. NJARC > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: to3a.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4604 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cpaci1 at verizon.net Fri Jun 10 04:40:25 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:40:25 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Al, You are right --- they are PNPs. I do have the schematic. I attached it... And they are in TO-3 packages exactly like your drawing. I can see how it' is wired, but I never saw a transistor used as a rectifier before. Thanks for your help Al. 73, Chuck From: Al Klase Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:32 AM To: njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Chuck, 660032 is probably a house number applied to transistors sold specifically to Allied (Knight). The early Bendix products were likely PNP Germanium transistors. Are they in TO-3 packages similar to this drawing? Do you have a schematic for the amp? I couldn't find anything on the web. To repair this thing you'll have to reverse engineer it. Not for beginners. The early solid state amplifiers had all sort of problems, and most sounded terrible even when working properly. Good luck, Al Al Klase ? N3FRQ Jersey City, NJ http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ On 6/9/2016 2:55 PM, Chuck wrote: Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Does anyone know what a good equivalent replacement transistor would be for a ?Bendix 660032?? It?s one of those metal quarter-size transistors - circa 1973. I?m working on a KX-60 Allied Knight kit - 50 watt solid-state stereo amplifier and found two of them (one shorted & one open) in the power supply circuit. I believe they are being used as rectifiers. Any info would be much appreciated! Thanks, Chuck AC2DP From: RICHARD LEE Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 9:38 PM To: Reflector Subject: [NJARC] June 10th Meeting at Princeton Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Greetings Fellow Enthusiasts! Just a reminder that the NJARC June 10th meeting will be held this Friday, at Bowen Hall, Princeton U. The agenda includes talks by V.P. Sal Brisindi...all you want to know about capacitor nomenclature.... and webmaster Dave Sica speaking on a resent break-through in CRT rebuilding...a small auction will follow. See you all there! Richard Lee., Pres. NJARC ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: KX-60_Schematic.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 770954 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DSCF0059-2.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 289494 bytes Desc: not available URL: From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 10 07:16:14 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:16:14 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> Chuck - I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 10 07:44:15 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:44:15 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <00f801d1c30d$6ade9be0$409bd3a0$@eozinc.com> Chuck - BTW, something caused those transistors to fail, and, you should try and find out what that is prior to just replacing them. I also believe that it is much earlier than the 1073 that you mention. By that time most amps were using Silicon NPN transistors. In 1973 I bought a Pioneer SA9100 amp that I still have and use. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From n2yeg at optonline.net Fri Jun 10 09:09:21 2016 From: n2yeg at optonline.net (Bill Zukowski) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:09:21 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Chuck, Two things are obvious from looking at the schematic: The transistor is a 2N234A; it's used as a filter amplifier. The 2N234A is a low gain PNP Ge audio transistor that has a substitute if NTE 121, still widely available. The only place I know of locally to pick one up is IEI on Rte. 36 in Hazlet. Or else any mail order supply house has them. They're used here as filter "amplifiers", one in the +23v bus and one in the -23v bus. The value of the two caps on the base of the transistor is essentially amplified, a common practice in the 60s and early 70s. As Al said, something caused the transistor to blow. The first thing I'd suspect are the output transistors fed by the now defunct 2N234A (TR 15, 16 or 17, 18). I worked for Sony/Superscope in the late 60s early 70s, and the early solid state power amps were very unreliable, plus I've seen this also in other amps with germanium power transistors that I've repaired in recent years. It doesn't look like an insurmountably problem Thanks, Bill http://www.ebay.com/itm/2N234A-PNP-GERM-ALLOY-TO-3-/141579288545?hash=item20f6c87fe1:g:CPUAAOSw5ZBWIAWy On 6/10/2016 4:40 AM, Chuck wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > > Hi Al, > You are right --- they are PNPs. > I do have the schematic. I attached it... > And they are in TO-3 packages exactly like your drawing. > I can see how it' is wired, but I never saw a transistor used as a > rectifier before. > Thanks for your help Al. > 73, > Chuck > From: Al Klase > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:32 AM > To: njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > _________________________________________________________ > Chuck, > 660032 is probably a house number applied to transistors sold > specifically to Allied (Knight). The early Bendix products were > likely PNP Germanium transistors. > Are they in TO-3 packages similar to this drawing? > Do you have a schematic for the amp? I couldn't find anything on the > web. To repair this thing you'll have to reverse engineer it. Not > for beginners. The early solid state amplifiers had all sort of > problems, and most sounded terrible even when working properly. > Good luck, > Al > Al Klase ? N3FRQ Jersey City, NJ http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ > On 6/9/2016 2:55 PM, Chuck wrote: > Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone > _________________________________________________________ > Does anyone know what a good equivalent replacement transistor would > be for a ?Bendix 660032?? > It?s one of those metal quarter-size transistors - circa 1973. > I?m working on a KX-60 Allied Knight kit - 50 watt solid-state stereo > amplifier and found two of them (one shorted & one open) in the power > supply circuit. > I believe they are being used as rectifiers. > Any info would be much appreciated! > Thanks, > Chuck > AC2DP > From: RICHARD LEE > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 9:38 PM > To: Reflector > Subject: [NJARC] June 10th Meeting at Princeton > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > _________________________________________________________ > Greetings Fellow Enthusiasts! Just a reminder that the NJARC June > 10th meeting will be held this Friday, at Bowen Hall, Princeton U. The > agenda includes talks by V.P. Sal Brisindi...all you want to know > about capacitor nomenclature.... and webmaster Dave Sica speaking on a > resent break-through in CRT rebuilding...a small auction will follow. > See you all there! Richard Lee., Pres. NJARC > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ NJARC > mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: > http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: nte121.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 52310 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cpaci1 at verizon.net Fri Jun 10 10:09:23 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:09:23 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001> Hi Mike, That sounds very plausible. My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power supply circuit design is new to me. If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them from you. Thanks Mike... Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck - I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From cpaci1 at verizon.net Fri Jun 10 10:25:48 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:25:48 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <00f801d1c30d$6ade9be0$409bd3a0$@eozinc.com> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00f801d1c30d$6ade9be0$409bd3a0$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <5FAA16E2368C47339B25AB54BFE8669B@WSSADMIN001> You are spot on Mike... Both filter caps were totally dried up and causing the power transformer to cook. I am sure that also caused one of those transistors to open and the other to short. I re-stuffed the filter caps then replaced the Bendix 660032s with a couple of Motorola IRF-240s I had in the shop. The amp came to life after that, but not quite fixed yet. Those transistors have built-in diodes and do not seem to be quite right, since they introduced a hum. Thanks again, Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:44 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck - BTW, something caused those transistors to fail, and, you should try and find out what that is prior to just replacing them. I also believe that it is much earlier than the 1073 that you mention. By that time most amps were using Silicon NPN transistors. In 1973 I bought a Pioneer SA9100 amp that I still have and use. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Motorola IRF-240.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 37919 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cpaci1 at verizon.net Fri Jun 10 10:36:23 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:36:23 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Bill, Thanks for attaching the data sheet. Looking at the schematic, your analysis sounds right on. I did find the filter caps totally shot, which caused the power supply transformer to overheat and those transistors to fail. I have been running it with new caps and a couple poor replacements for the 660032s, but it is stable now even though it has a hum. Thanks, Chuck From: Bill Zukowski Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:09 AM To: Chuck ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck, Two things are obvious from looking at the schematic: The transistor is a 2N234A; it's used as a filter amplifier. The 2N234A is a low gain PNP Ge audio transistor that has a substitute if NTE 121, still widely available. The only place I know of locally to pick one up is IEI on Rte. 36 in Hazlet. Or else any mail order supply house has them. They're used here as filter "amplifiers", one in the +23v bus and one in the -23v bus. The value of the two caps on the base of the transistor is essentially amplified, a common practice in the 60s and early 70s. As Al said, something caused the transistor to blow. The first thing I'd suspect are the output transistors fed by the now defunct 2N234A (TR 15, 16 or 17, 18). I worked for Sony/Superscope in the late 60s early 70s, and the early solid state power amps were very unreliable, plus I've seen this also in other amps with germanium power transistors that I've repaired in recent years. It doesn't look like an insurmountably problem Thanks, Bill http://www.ebay.com/itm/2N234A-PNP-GERM-ALLOY-TO-3-/141579288545?hash=item20f6c87fe1:g:CPUAAOSw5ZBWIAWy On 6/10/2016 4:40 AM, Chuck wrote: Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Hi Al, You are right --- they are PNPs. I do have the schematic. I attached it... And they are in TO-3 packages exactly like your drawing. I can see how it' is wired, but I never saw a transistor used as a rectifier before. Thanks for your help Al. 73, Chuck From: Al Klase Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:32 AM To: njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Chuck, 660032 is probably a house number applied to transistors sold specifically to Allied (Knight). The early Bendix products were likely PNP Germanium transistors. Are they in TO-3 packages similar to this drawing? Do you have a schematic for the amp? I couldn't find anything on the web. To repair this thing you'll have to reverse engineer it. Not for beginners. The early solid state amplifiers had all sort of problems, and most sounded terrible even when working properly. Good luck, Al Al Klase ? N3FRQ Jersey City, NJ http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ On 6/9/2016 2:55 PM, Chuck wrote: Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Does anyone know what a good equivalent replacement transistor would be for a ?Bendix 660032?? It?s one of those metal quarter-size transistors - circa 1973. I?m working on a KX-60 Allied Knight kit - 50 watt solid-state stereo amplifier and found two of them (one shorted & one open) in the power supply circuit. I believe they are being used as rectifiers. Any info would be much appreciated! Thanks, Chuck AC2DP From: RICHARD LEE Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 9:38 PM To: Reflector Subject: [NJARC] June 10th Meeting at Princeton Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Greetings Fellow Enthusiasts! Just a reminder that the NJARC June 10th meeting will be held this Friday, at Bowen Hall, Princeton U. The agenda includes talks by V.P. Sal Brisindi...all you want to know about capacitor nomenclature.... and webmaster Dave Sica speaking on a resent break-through in CRT rebuilding...a small auction will follow. See you all there! Richard Lee., Pres. NJARC ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 10 10:45:20 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:45:20 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <5FAA16E2368C47339B25AB54BFE8669B@WSSADMIN001> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00f801d1c30d$6ade9be0$409bd3a0$@eozinc.com> <5FAA16E2368C47339B25AB54BFE8669B@WSSADMIN001> Message-ID: <015401d1c326$b7428aa0$25c79fe0$@eozinc.com> Chuck - I do not think the IRF240's are doing you much good in that circuit as they are N channel FETs. If the amp now works, you could even try it by not using any transistors at all in the PS, however, possibly replacing the caps to about 10,000 microfarads at 25 volts. Even just one in the positive and one in the negative should do it. As those transistors were C multipliers anyway, as I said before, you can get away without using them. A scope may help also, but, I would definitely take out the FETs. Also check for other defective caps within the amp itself. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:26 AM To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier You are spot on Mike... Both filter caps were totally dried up and causing the power transformer to cook. I am sure that also caused one of those transistors to open and the other to short. I re-stuffed the filter caps then replaced the Bendix 660032s with a couple of Motorola IRF-240s I had in the shop. The amp came to life after that, but not quite fixed yet. Those transistors have built-in diodes and do not seem to be quite right, since they introduced a hum. Thanks again, Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:44 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck - BTW, something caused those transistors to fail, and, you should try and find out what that is prior to just replacing them. I also believe that it is much earlier than the 1073 that you mention. By that time most amps were using Silicon NPN transistors. In 1973 I bought a Pioneer SA9100 amp that I still have and use. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 10 10:48:24 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:48:24 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <5FAA16E2368C47339B25AB54BFE8669B@WSSADMIN001> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00f801d1c30d$6ade9be0$409bd3a0$@eozinc.com> <5FAA16E2368C47339B25AB54BFE8669B@WSSADMIN001> Message-ID: <015801d1c327$26c60eb0$74522c10$@eozinc.com> Another BTW, check the diodes in the supplies as well. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:26 AM To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier You are spot on Mike... Both filter caps were totally dried up and causing the power transformer to cook. I am sure that also caused one of those transistors to open and the other to short. I re-stuffed the filter caps then replaced the Bendix 660032s with a couple of Motorola IRF-240s I had in the shop. The amp came to life after that, but not quite fixed yet. Those transistors have built-in diodes and do not seem to be quite right, since they introduced a hum. Thanks again, Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:44 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck - BTW, something caused those transistors to fail, and, you should try and find out what that is prior to just replacing them. I also believe that it is much earlier than the 1073 that you mention. By that time most amps were using Silicon NPN transistors. In 1973 I bought a Pioneer SA9100 amp that I still have and use. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 10 10:57:02 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:57:02 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> <77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001> Message-ID: <015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com> If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs and check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical as the voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your only real criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even NPNs would work, but would require some circuit topology of the PS to change. Even silicon will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt less out. Will let you know as I have thousands. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi Mike, That sounds very plausible. My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power supply circuit design is new to me. If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them from you. Thanks Mike... Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck - I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From cpaci1 at verizon.net Fri Jun 10 11:06:19 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:06:19 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <015801d1c327$26c60eb0$74522c10$@eozinc.com> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00f801d1c30d$6ade9be0$409bd3a0$@eozinc.com> <5FAA16E2368C47339B25AB54BFE8669B@WSSADMIN001> <015801d1c327$26c60eb0$74522c10$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <72038FD5331E4EFF8B7942E2E1FA0A3D@WSSADMIN001> Thanks for the warning! I will take those transistors out! All of the diodes tested good. That was one of the first things I checked. And I completely recapped the amp, so it is getting there. I forgot what made me think those IRF-240 transistors might work, or why I tried them, but you can hear that they are not what the amp needs. I understand what you are describing about eliminating the transistors all together. It sounds like a great idea, but the amp belongs to a friend of mine and I don't think I should change anything in it. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:48 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Another BTW, check the diodes in the supplies as well. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:26 AM To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier You are spot on Mike... Both filter caps were totally dried up and causing the power transformer to cook. I am sure that also caused one of those transistors to open and the other to short. I re-stuffed the filter caps then replaced the Bendix 660032s with a couple of Motorola IRF-240s I had in the shop. The amp came to life after that, but not quite fixed yet. Those transistors have built-in diodes and do not seem to be quite right, since they introduced a hum. Thanks again, Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:44 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck - BTW, something caused those transistors to fail, and, you should try and find out what that is prior to just replacing them. I also believe that it is much earlier than the 1073 that you mention. By that time most amps were using Silicon NPN transistors. In 1973 I bought a Pioneer SA9100 amp that I still have and use. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From cpaci1 at verizon.net Fri Jun 10 11:08:35 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:08:35 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> <77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001> <015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: Thank you Mike. You have been a great help! And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. See you tonight at the meeting. Thanks again!!!!!!! Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs and check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical as the voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your only real criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even NPNs would work, but would require some circuit topology of the PS to change. Even silicon will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt less out. Will let you know as I have thousands. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi Mike, That sounds very plausible. My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power supply circuit design is new to me. If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them from you. Thanks Mike... Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck - I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 10 12:35:59 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:35:59 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> <77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001> <015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> Chuck - Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found some 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but silicon. I am sure they will work just fine in that circuit. You can pick them up, or, I can mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 - Mike http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Thank you Mike. You have been a great help! And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. See you tonight at the meeting. Thanks again!!!!!!! Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs and check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical as the voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your only real criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even NPNs would work, but would require some circuit topology of the PS to change. Even silicon will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt less out. Will let you know as I have thousands. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi Mike, That sounds very plausible. My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power supply circuit design is new to me. If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them from you. Thanks Mike... Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck - I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From ark at ar88.net Fri Jun 10 13:34:22 2016 From: ark at ar88.net (Al Klase) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:34:22 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> <77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001> <015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com> <018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: Chuck, Mike's analysis has been spot on. In this particular circuit, silicon should work just fine, that's not always the case. In the mean time I dug through my Germanium power box, and will bring some PNP TO-3 along to the meeting. Mike, can you take a SWAG at the required HFE (gain). I'm thing 10 would be sufficient. Al Al Klase ? N3FRQ Jersey City, NJ http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ On 6/10/2016 12:35 PM, Mike Feher wrote: > Chuck - > > Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found some > 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but silicon. I am sure > they will work just fine in that circuit. You can pick them up, or, I can > mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 - Mike > > http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM > To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Thank you Mike. > You have been a great help! > And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. > See you tonight at the meeting. > Thanks again!!!!!!! > Chuck > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Feher > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM > To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs and > check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical as the > voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your only real > criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even NPNs would work, > but would require some circuit topology of the PS to change. Even silicon > will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt less out. Will let you know as > I have thousands. 73 - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM > To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Hi Mike, > That sounds very plausible. > My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power supply > circuit design is new to me. > If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them from > you. > > Thanks Mike... > Chuck > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Feher > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM > To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Chuck - > > I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers using the > Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I have lots of PNP > power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > -----Original Message----- > From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM > To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 10 14:53:24 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:53:24 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> <77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001> <015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com> <018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <01a801d1c349$5e62d7a0$1b2886e0$@eozinc.com> Al - Great, now I do not have to go down in the basement or mail a package, HI. As I mentioned earlier, this is a simple C multiplier. An hfe of 10 is adequate, but, I even wonder if you can find transistors that low. And, in this case, you do not really need them anyway if you could increase the C. Typical germanium current gains were less than that of silicon, and I measured two of the 2N4398s here and they were both close to 200. I am sure whatever PNP germanium/silicon you bring will be just fine for Chuck. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Al Klase [mailto:ark at ar88.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:34 PM To: Mike Feher; 'Chuck'; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Chuck, Mike's analysis has been spot on. In this particular circuit, silicon should work just fine, that's not always the case. In the mean time I dug through my Germanium power box, and will bring some PNP TO-3 along to the meeting. Mike, can you take a SWAG at the required HFE (gain). I'm thing 10 would be sufficient. Al Al Klase - N3FRQ Jersey City, NJ http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ On 6/10/2016 12:35 PM, Mike Feher wrote: > Chuck - > > Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found > some 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but > silicon. I am sure they will work just fine in that circuit. You can > pick them up, or, I can mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 - > Mike > > http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM > To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Thank you Mike. > You have been a great help! > And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. > See you tonight at the meeting. > Thanks again!!!!!!! > Chuck > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Feher > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM > To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs and > check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical as > the voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your only > real criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even NPNs > would work, but would require some circuit topology of the PS to > change. Even silicon will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt less > out. Will let you know as I have thousands. 73 - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM > To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Hi Mike, > That sounds very plausible. > My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power supply > circuit design is new to me. > If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them > from you. > > Thanks Mike... > Chuck > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Feher > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM > To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Chuck - > > I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers > using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I > have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > -----Original Message----- > From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM > To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > From rjlfirst at msn.com Fri Jun 10 21:04:46 2016 From: rjlfirst at msn.com (Rich) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:04:46 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: Hi guys, I use to repair those old transistor car radios and just wanted to say that as you know most used Ge PNP power transistors. Substituting a silicon PNP will usually result in cross-over distortion due to the difference in the base-emitter bias voltage. Give it a try, it will not cause any damage, just a good possibility of distortion. Good Luck with it, Rich L. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Al Klase" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:34 PM To: "Mike Feher" ; "'Chuck'" ; Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Chuck, > > Mike's analysis has been spot on. In this particular circuit, silicon > should work just fine, that's not always the case. > > In the mean time I dug through my Germanium power box, and will bring some > PNP TO-3 along to the meeting. > > Mike, can you take a SWAG at the required HFE (gain). I'm thing 10 would > be sufficient. > > Al > > Al Klase ? N3FRQ > Jersey City, NJ > http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ > > On 6/10/2016 12:35 PM, Mike Feher wrote: >> Chuck - >> >> Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found >> some >> 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but silicon. I am >> sure >> they will work just fine in that circuit. You can pick them up, or, I can >> mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 - Mike >> >> http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Thank you Mike. >> You have been a great help! >> And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. >> See you tonight at the meeting. >> Thanks again!!!!!!! >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs and >> check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical as the >> voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your only real >> criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even NPNs would >> work, >> but would require some circuit topology of the PS to change. Even silicon >> will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt less out. Will let you know >> as >> I have thousands. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Hi Mike, >> That sounds very plausible. >> My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power supply >> circuit design is new to me. >> If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them from >> you. >> >> Thanks Mike... >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Chuck - >> >> I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers using >> the >> Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I have lots of PNP >> power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM >> To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From cpaci1 at verizon.net Fri Jun 10 23:45:02 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 23:45:02 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: Hi Rich, I think I got the right type from Al tonight at the meeting. I'm going to give that a try tomorrow. I'll let everyone know if it works... Thanks for the heads-up Rich! Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Rich Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:04 PM To: Mike Feher ; 'Chuck' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net ; Al Klase Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi guys, I use to repair those old transistor car radios and just wanted to say that as you know most used Ge PNP power transistors. Substituting a silicon PNP will usually result in cross-over distortion due to the difference in the base-emitter bias voltage. Give it a try, it will not cause any damage, just a good possibility of distortion. Good Luck with it, Rich L. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Al Klase" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:34 PM To: "Mike Feher" ; "'Chuck'" ; Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Chuck, > > Mike's analysis has been spot on. In this particular circuit, silicon > should work just fine, that's not always the case. > > In the mean time I dug through my Germanium power box, and will bring some > PNP TO-3 along to the meeting. > > Mike, can you take a SWAG at the required HFE (gain). I'm thing 10 would > be sufficient. > > Al > > Al Klase ? N3FRQ > Jersey City, NJ > http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ > > On 6/10/2016 12:35 PM, Mike Feher wrote: >> Chuck - >> >> Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found >> some >> 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but silicon. I am >> sure >> they will work just fine in that circuit. You can pick them up, or, I can >> mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 - Mike >> >> http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Thank you Mike. >> You have been a great help! >> And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. >> See you tonight at the meeting. >> Thanks again!!!!!!! >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs and >> check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical as the >> voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your only real >> criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even NPNs would >> work, >> but would require some circuit topology of the PS to change. Even silicon >> will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt less out. Will let you know >> as >> I have thousands. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Hi Mike, >> That sounds very plausible. >> My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power supply >> circuit design is new to me. >> If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them from >> you. >> >> Thanks Mike... >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Chuck - >> >> I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers using >> the >> Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I have lots of PNP >> power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM >> To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 10 23:48:33 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 23:48:33 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> I do not believe that Rich read the earlier emails and saw the schematic of where these are used. So, I did not comment on his post. Let us know Chuck. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:45 PM To: Rich; Mike Feher; njarc at mailman.qth.net; Al Klase Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi Rich, I think I got the right type from Al tonight at the meeting. I'm going to give that a try tomorrow. I'll let everyone know if it works... Thanks for the heads-up Rich! Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Rich Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:04 PM To: Mike Feher ; 'Chuck' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net ; Al Klase Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi guys, I use to repair those old transistor car radios and just wanted to say that as you know most used Ge PNP power transistors. Substituting a silicon PNP will usually result in cross-over distortion due to the difference in the base-emitter bias voltage. Give it a try, it will not cause any damage, just a good possibility of distortion. Good Luck with it, Rich L. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Al Klase" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:34 PM To: "Mike Feher" ; "'Chuck'" ; Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Chuck, > > Mike's analysis has been spot on. In this particular circuit, silicon > should work just fine, that's not always the case. > > In the mean time I dug through my Germanium power box, and will bring > some PNP TO-3 along to the meeting. > > Mike, can you take a SWAG at the required HFE (gain). I'm thing 10 > would be sufficient. > > Al > > Al Klase - N3FRQ > Jersey City, NJ > http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ > > On 6/10/2016 12:35 PM, Mike Feher wrote: >> Chuck - >> >> Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found >> some 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but >> silicon. I am sure they will work just fine in that circuit. You can >> pick them up, or, I can mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 >> - Mike >> >> http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Thank you Mike. >> You have been a great help! >> And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. >> See you tonight at the meeting. >> Thanks again!!!!!!! >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs >> and check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical >> as the voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your >> only real criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even >> NPNs would work, but would require some circuit topology of the PS to >> change. Even silicon will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt >> less out. Will let you know as I have thousands. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Hi Mike, >> That sounds very plausible. >> My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power >> supply circuit design is new to me. >> If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them >> from you. >> >> Thanks Mike... >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Chuck - >> >> I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers >> using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I >> have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM >> To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From trainbee at aol.com Sat Jun 11 07:54:03 2016 From: trainbee at aol.com (TrainBee) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:54:03 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Cap reference sheet Message-ID: <1553f4fd17e-807-296c@webprd-m72.mail.aol.com> Sal, Do you have version of the Capacitor Reference sheet you could send me or post on the website? Thanks. Joe Devonshire -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rjlfirst at msn.com Sat Jun 11 08:42:01 2016 From: rjlfirst at msn.com (Rich) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:42:01 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: Mike, Right on. I didn't see the schematic. For some reason I thought that you guys were referring to an early transistorized car radio. I may have mixed up a couple of emails. But I would be happy to take a look at the schematic if things don't work out for you. Rich L. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Feher" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:48 PM To: "'Chuck'" ; "'Rich'" ; ; "'Al Klase'" Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > I do not believe that Rich read the earlier emails and saw the schematic > of > where these are used. So, I did not comment on his post. Let us know > Chuck. > 73 - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:45 PM > To: Rich; Mike Feher; njarc at mailman.qth.net; Al Klase > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Hi Rich, > I think I got the right type from Al tonight at the meeting. > I'm going to give that a try tomorrow. > I'll let everyone know if it works... > > Thanks for the heads-up Rich! > > Chuck > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:04 PM > To: Mike Feher ; 'Chuck' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net ; Al Klase > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Hi guys, > > I use to repair those old transistor car radios and just wanted to say > that > as you know most used Ge PNP power transistors. Substituting a silicon PNP > will usually result in cross-over distortion due to the difference in the > base-emitter bias voltage. Give it a try, it will not cause any damage, > just a good possibility of distortion. > > Good Luck with it, > Rich L. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Al Klase" > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:34 PM > To: "Mike Feher" ; "'Chuck'" ; > > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> Chuck, >> >> Mike's analysis has been spot on. In this particular circuit, silicon >> should work just fine, that's not always the case. >> >> In the mean time I dug through my Germanium power box, and will bring >> some PNP TO-3 along to the meeting. >> >> Mike, can you take a SWAG at the required HFE (gain). I'm thing 10 >> would be sufficient. >> >> Al >> >> Al Klase - N3FRQ >> Jersey City, NJ >> http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ >> >> On 6/10/2016 12:35 PM, Mike Feher wrote: >>> Chuck - >>> >>> Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found >>> some 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but >>> silicon. I am sure they will work just fine in that circuit. You can >>> pick them up, or, I can mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 >>> - Mike >>> >>> http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf >>> >>> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >>> 89 Arnold Blvd. >>> Howell, NJ, 07731 >>> 732-886-5960 >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM >>> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> Thank you Mike. >>> You have been a great help! >>> And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. >>> See you tonight at the meeting. >>> Thanks again!!!!!!! >>> Chuck >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mike Feher >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM >>> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs >>> and check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical >>> as the voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your >>> only real criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even >>> NPNs would work, but would require some circuit topology of the PS to >>> change. Even silicon will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt >>> less out. Will let you know as I have thousands. 73 - Mike >>> >>> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >>> 89 Arnold Blvd. >>> Howell, NJ, 07731 >>> 732-886-5960 >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM >>> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> Hi Mike, >>> That sounds very plausible. >>> My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power >>> supply circuit design is new to me. >>> If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them >>> from you. >>> >>> Thanks Mike... >>> Chuck >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mike Feher >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM >>> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> Chuck - >>> >>> I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers >>> using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I >>> have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike >>> >>> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >>> 89 Arnold Blvd. >>> Howell, NJ, 07731 >>> 732-886-5960 >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM >>> To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> Just remember >>> Reply = Poster >>> Reply All = Everyone >>> >>> _________________________________________________________ >>> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> NJARC mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email >> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > From rjlfirst at msn.com Sat Jun 11 08:43:18 2016 From: rjlfirst at msn.com (Rich) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:43:18 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: Sounds good. Hope it works out for you. Rich -------------------------------------------------- From: "Chuck" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:45 PM To: "Rich" ; "Mike Feher" ; ; "Al Klase" Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > Hi Rich, > I think I got the right type from Al tonight at the meeting. > I'm going to give that a try tomorrow. > I'll let everyone know if it works... > > Thanks for the heads-up Rich! > > Chuck > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:04 PM > To: Mike Feher ; 'Chuck' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net ; Al Klase > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Hi guys, > > I use to repair those old transistor car radios and just wanted to say > that > as you know most used Ge PNP power transistors. Substituting a silicon PNP > will usually result in cross-over distortion due to the difference in the > base-emitter bias voltage. Give it a try, it will not cause any damage, > just a good possibility of distortion. > > Good Luck with it, > Rich L. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Al Klase" > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:34 PM > To: "Mike Feher" ; "'Chuck'" ; > > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> Chuck, >> >> Mike's analysis has been spot on. In this particular circuit, silicon >> should work just fine, that's not always the case. >> >> In the mean time I dug through my Germanium power box, and will bring >> some PNP TO-3 along to the meeting. >> >> Mike, can you take a SWAG at the required HFE (gain). I'm thing 10 would >> be sufficient. >> >> Al >> >> Al Klase ? N3FRQ >> Jersey City, NJ >> http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ >> >> On 6/10/2016 12:35 PM, Mike Feher wrote: >>> Chuck - >>> >>> Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found >>> some >>> 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but silicon. I am >>> sure >>> they will work just fine in that circuit. You can pick them up, or, I >>> can >>> mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 - Mike >>> >>> http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf >>> >>> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >>> 89 Arnold Blvd. >>> Howell, NJ, 07731 >>> 732-886-5960 >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM >>> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> Thank you Mike. >>> You have been a great help! >>> And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. >>> See you tonight at the meeting. >>> Thanks again!!!!!!! >>> Chuck >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mike Feher >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM >>> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs and >>> check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical as the >>> voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your only real >>> criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even NPNs would >>> work, >>> but would require some circuit topology of the PS to change. Even >>> silicon >>> will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt less out. Will let you know >>> as >>> I have thousands. 73 - Mike >>> >>> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >>> 89 Arnold Blvd. >>> Howell, NJ, 07731 >>> 732-886-5960 >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM >>> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> Hi Mike, >>> That sounds very plausible. >>> My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power supply >>> circuit design is new to me. >>> If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them from >>> you. >>> >>> Thanks Mike... >>> Chuck >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mike Feher >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM >>> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> Chuck - >>> >>> I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers using >>> the >>> Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I have lots of >>> PNP >>> power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike >>> >>> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >>> 89 Arnold Blvd. >>> Howell, NJ, 07731 >>> 732-886-5960 >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck >>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM >>> To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >>> >>> Just remember >>> Reply = Poster >>> Reply All = Everyone >>> >>> _________________________________________________________ >>> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> NJARC mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > From n4fs at eozinc.com Sat Jun 11 08:46:37 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:46:37 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <031b01d1c3df$4c3c7950$e4b56bf0$@eozinc.com> Rich - Thanks for the offer, but this was not for me, but for a solid state amp that Chuck was trying to repair for a friend. If you look back you may see a post that Chuck made that included the schematic. The transistors that were defective were used as simple Miller effect C multipliers in the power supply. That is why Ge or Si did not matter in the application even though the originals were Ge. Regardless, I am not going to repeat all the previous posts, but appreciate your offer. Regards - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Rich [mailto:rjlfirst at msn.com] Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 8:42 AM To: Mike Feher; 'Chuck'; njarc at mailman.qth.net; 'Al Klase' Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Mike, Right on. I didn't see the schematic. For some reason I thought that you guys were referring to an early transistorized car radio. I may have mixed up a couple of emails. But I would be happy to take a look at the schematic if things don't work out for you. Rich L. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Feher" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:48 PM To: "'Chuck'" ; "'Rich'" ; ; "'Al Klase'" Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > I do not believe that Rich read the earlier emails and saw the > schematic of where these are used. So, I did not comment on his post. > Let us know Chuck. > 73 - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 From rjlfirst at msn.com Sat Jun 11 12:24:49 2016 From: rjlfirst at msn.com (Rich) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:24:49 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <031b01d1c3df$4c3c7950$e4b56bf0$@eozinc.com> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> <031b01d1c3df$4c3c7950$e4b56bf0$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: OK Mike, Not necessary to repeat any of the messages. I am familiar with capacitive multiplier circuits. Hope all goes well. Rich -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Feher" Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 8:46 AM To: "'Rich'" ; "'Chuck'" ; ; "'Al Klase'" Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > Rich - > > Thanks for the offer, but this was not for me, but for a solid state amp > that Chuck was trying to repair for a friend. If you look back you may see > a > post that Chuck made that included the schematic. The transistors that > were > defective were used as simple Miller effect C multipliers in the power > supply. That is why Ge or Si did not matter in the application even > though > the originals were Ge. Regardless, I am not going to repeat all the > previous > posts, but appreciate your offer. Regards - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich [mailto:rjlfirst at msn.com] > Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 8:42 AM > To: Mike Feher; 'Chuck'; njarc at mailman.qth.net; 'Al Klase' > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Mike, > > Right on. I didn't see the schematic. For some reason I thought that you > guys were referring to an early transistorized car radio. I may have > mixed > up a couple of emails. But I would be happy to take a look at the > schematic > if things don't work out for you. > > Rich L. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Mike Feher" > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:48 PM > To: "'Chuck'" ; "'Rich'" ; > ; "'Al Klase'" > Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > >> I do not believe that Rich read the earlier emails and saw the >> schematic of where these are used. So, I did not comment on his post. >> Let us know Chuck. >> 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 > > From dave.sica at njarc.org Sat Jun 11 22:16:01 2016 From: dave.sica at njarc.org (David Sica) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 22:16:01 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> <77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001> <015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com> <018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> <031b01d1c3df$4c3c7950$e4b56bf0$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: Gotta love this group. I've been a 'shade tree' radio mechanic most of my life yet I had never heard of filter multipliers before. Ya learn something every day. -- Dave New Jersey Antique Radio Club On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Rich wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > OK Mike, > > Not necessary to repeat any of the messages. I am familiar with capacitive > multiplier circuits. Hope all goes well. > > Rich > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Mike Feher" > Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 8:46 AM > To: "'Rich'" ; "'Chuck'" ; < > njarc at mailman.qth.net>; "'Al Klase'" > > Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Rich - >> >> Thanks for the offer, but this was not for me, but for a solid state amp >> that Chuck was trying to repair for a friend. If you look back you may >> see a >> post that Chuck made that included the schematic. The transistors that >> were >> defective were used as simple Miller effect C multipliers in the power >> supply. That is why Ge or Si did not matter in the application even >> though >> the originals were Ge. Regardless, I am not going to repeat all the >> previous >> posts, but appreciate your offer. Regards - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rich [mailto:rjlfirst at msn.com] >> Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 8:42 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Chuck'; njarc at mailman.qth.net; 'Al Klase' >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Mike, >> >> Right on. I didn't see the schematic. For some reason I thought that you >> guys were referring to an early transistorized car radio. I may have >> mixed >> up a couple of emails. But I would be happy to take a look at the >> schematic >> if things don't work out for you. >> >> Rich L. >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Mike Feher" >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:48 PM >> To: "'Chuck'" ; "'Rich'" ; >> ; "'Al Klase'" >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> I do not believe that Rich read the earlier emails and saw the >>> schematic of where these are used. So, I did not comment on his post. >>> Let us know Chuck. >>> 73 - Mike >>> >>> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >>> 89 Arnold Blvd. >>> Howell, NJ, 07731 >>> 732-886-5960 >>> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cpaci1 at verizon.net Sat Jun 11 23:23:58 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 23:23:58 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <5FFB6BF5003142DFA1EF577A53274EE0@WSSADMIN001> Hi Mike, The transistors Al gave me did work! Thank you Al!!! Except I can't tell you what they are because the print is worn of them and I cannot read the numbers - ugh --- lol... -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:48 PM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Rich' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net ; 'Al Klase' Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier I do not believe that Rich read the earlier emails and saw the schematic of where these are used. So, I did not comment on his post. Let us know Chuck. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:45 PM To: Rich; Mike Feher; njarc at mailman.qth.net; Al Klase Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi Rich, I think I got the right type from Al tonight at the meeting. I'm going to give that a try tomorrow. I'll let everyone know if it works... Thanks for the heads-up Rich! Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Rich Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:04 PM To: Mike Feher ; 'Chuck' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net ; Al Klase Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi guys, I use to repair those old transistor car radios and just wanted to say that as you know most used Ge PNP power transistors. Substituting a silicon PNP will usually result in cross-over distortion due to the difference in the base-emitter bias voltage. Give it a try, it will not cause any damage, just a good possibility of distortion. Good Luck with it, Rich L. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Al Klase" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:34 PM To: "Mike Feher" ; "'Chuck'" ; Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Chuck, > > Mike's analysis has been spot on. In this particular circuit, silicon > should work just fine, that's not always the case. > > In the mean time I dug through my Germanium power box, and will bring > some PNP TO-3 along to the meeting. > > Mike, can you take a SWAG at the required HFE (gain). I'm thing 10 > would be sufficient. > > Al > > Al Klase - N3FRQ > Jersey City, NJ > http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ > > On 6/10/2016 12:35 PM, Mike Feher wrote: >> Chuck - >> >> Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found >> some 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but >> silicon. I am sure they will work just fine in that circuit. You can >> pick them up, or, I can mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 >> - Mike >> >> http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Thank you Mike. >> You have been a great help! >> And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. >> See you tonight at the meeting. >> Thanks again!!!!!!! >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs >> and check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical >> as the voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your >> only real criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even >> NPNs would work, but would require some circuit topology of the PS to >> change. Even silicon will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt >> less out. Will let you know as I have thousands. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Hi Mike, >> That sounds very plausible. >> My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power >> supply circuit design is new to me. >> If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them >> from you. >> >> Thanks Mike... >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Chuck - >> >> I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers >> using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I >> have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM >> To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From cpaci1 at verizon.net Sat Jun 11 23:31:41 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 23:31:41 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> <031b01d1c3df$4c3c7950$e4b56bf0$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: I still appreciated your input Rich. The amp is operational now and that has revealed the next set of issues I'll have to figure out. So this amp is by no means all done yet! Fun!!! - lol Thanks everyone, Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Rich Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 12:24 PM To: Mike Feher ; 'Chuck' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net ; 'Al Klase' Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier OK Mike, Not necessary to repeat any of the messages. I am familiar with capacitive multiplier circuits. Hope all goes well. Rich -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Feher" Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 8:46 AM To: "'Rich'" ; "'Chuck'" ; ; "'Al Klase'" Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > Rich - > > Thanks for the offer, but this was not for me, but for a solid state amp > that Chuck was trying to repair for a friend. If you look back you may see > a > post that Chuck made that included the schematic. The transistors that > were > defective were used as simple Miller effect C multipliers in the power > supply. That is why Ge or Si did not matter in the application even > though > the originals were Ge. Regardless, I am not going to repeat all the > previous > posts, but appreciate your offer. Regards - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich [mailto:rjlfirst at msn.com] > Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 8:42 AM > To: Mike Feher; 'Chuck'; njarc at mailman.qth.net; 'Al Klase' > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > > Mike, > > Right on. I didn't see the schematic. For some reason I thought that you > guys were referring to an early transistorized car radio. I may have > mixed > up a couple of emails. But I would be happy to take a look at the > schematic > if things don't work out for you. > > Rich L. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Mike Feher" > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:48 PM > To: "'Chuck'" ; "'Rich'" ; > ; "'Al Klase'" > Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > >> I do not believe that Rich read the earlier emails and saw the >> schematic of where these are used. So, I did not comment on his post. >> Let us know Chuck. >> 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 > > From n4fs at eozinc.com Sat Jun 11 23:32:26 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 23:32:26 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: <5FFB6BF5003142DFA1EF577A53274EE0@WSSADMIN001> References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com><00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com><77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001><015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com><018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> <5FFB6BF5003142DFA1EF577A53274EE0@WSSADMIN001> Message-ID: <013101d1c45b$0b721930$22564b90$@eozinc.com> Chuck - Good news. As I said, just about anything would work in that circuit, so, do not worry about the numbers, HI. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 11:24 PM To: Mike Feher; 'Rich'; njarc at mailman.qth.net; 'Al Klase' Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi Mike, The transistors Al gave me did work! Thank you Al!!! Except I can't tell you what they are because the print is worn of them and I cannot read the numbers - ugh --- lol... -----Original Message----- From: Mike Feher Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:48 PM To: 'Chuck' ; 'Rich' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net ; 'Al Klase' Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier I do not believe that Rich read the earlier emails and saw the schematic of where these are used. So, I did not comment on his post. Let us know Chuck. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:45 PM To: Rich; Mike Feher; njarc at mailman.qth.net; Al Klase Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi Rich, I think I got the right type from Al tonight at the meeting. I'm going to give that a try tomorrow. I'll let everyone know if it works... Thanks for the heads-up Rich! Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Rich Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:04 PM To: Mike Feher ; 'Chuck' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net ; Al Klase Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Hi guys, I use to repair those old transistor car radios and just wanted to say that as you know most used Ge PNP power transistors. Substituting a silicon PNP will usually result in cross-over distortion due to the difference in the base-emitter bias voltage. Give it a try, it will not cause any damage, just a good possibility of distortion. Good Luck with it, Rich L. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Al Klase" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:34 PM To: "Mike Feher" ; "'Chuck'" ; Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Chuck, > > Mike's analysis has been spot on. In this particular circuit, silicon > should work just fine, that's not always the case. > > In the mean time I dug through my Germanium power box, and will bring > some PNP TO-3 along to the meeting. > > Mike, can you take a SWAG at the required HFE (gain). I'm thing 10 > would be sufficient. > > Al > > Al Klase - N3FRQ > Jersey City, NJ > http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ > > On 6/10/2016 12:35 PM, Mike Feher wrote: >> Chuck - >> >> Even without going downstairs, which I try to avoid nowadays, I found >> some 2N4398s by Motorola that are NOS. These are TO-3 PNPs but >> silicon. I am sure they will work just fine in that circuit. You can >> pick them up, or, I can mail them to you. Here is the data sheet. 73 >> - Mike >> >> http://www.nteinc.com/specs/original/2N4398_99.pdf >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Thank you Mike. >> You have been a great help! >> And -- I would be more than happy to pay for those transistors. >> See you tonight at the meeting. >> Thanks again!!!!!!! >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:57 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> If I find a couple you can have them. I just have to go downstairs >> and check, but, I know I have them. They are really not that critical >> as the voltages on all three junctions is essentially the same. Your >> only real criteria is that they be PNP in a TO-3 style package. Even >> NPNs would work, but would require some circuit topology of the PS to >> change. Even silicon will work, giving you a few tenths of a volt >> less out. Will let you know as I have thousands. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chuck [mailto:cpaci1 at verizon.net] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:09 AM >> To: Mike Feher; 'Al Klase'; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Hi Mike, >> That sounds very plausible. >> My experience with solid state is fairly limited and this power >> supply circuit design is new to me. >> If you do find a couple transistors that will work, I will buy them >> from you. >> >> Thanks Mike... >> Chuck >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Feher >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:16 AM >> To: 'Chuck' ; 'Al Klase' ; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Chuck - >> >> I believe on this case the transistors are acting as C multipliers >> using the Miller effect. The diodes are doing the rectification. I >> have lots of PNP power Ge transistors. 73 - Mike >> >> Mike B. Feher, N4FS >> 89 Arnold Blvd. >> Howell, NJ, 07731 >> 732-886-5960 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:40 AM >> To: Al Klase; njarc at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier >> >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From cpaci1 at verizon.net Sat Jun 11 23:33:21 2016 From: cpaci1 at verizon.net (Chuck) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 23:33:21 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier In-Reply-To: References: <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1318812953.131536.1465349939621.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <00e901d1c309$811787e0$834697a0$@eozinc.com> <77F3C305499B4C5AA27DA63C8B8ADC15@WSSADMIN001> <015901d1c328$594669b0$0bd33d10$@eozinc.com> <018301d1c336$2c73ec60$855bc520$@eozinc.com> <023601d1c394$2141edc0$63c5c940$@eozinc.com> <031b01d1c3df$4c3c7950$e4b56bf0$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: That?s exactly why I joined the club Dave --- to learn from the experts. And this club is full of them!!! I have come so far just working with these guys in the radio clinics. I knew nothing then compared to what I know now and I am thankful to everyone! 73, Chuck From: David Sica Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 10:16 PM To: njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gotta love this group.? I've been a 'shade tree' radio mechanic most of my life yet I had never heard of filter multipliers before.? Ya learn something every day. -- Dave New Jersey Antique Radio Club On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Rich wrote: Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ OK Mike, Not necessary to repeat any of the messages. I am familiar with capacitive multiplier circuits. Hope all goes well. Rich -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Feher" Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 8:46 AM To: "'Rich'" ; "'Chuck'" ; ; "'Al Klase'" Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Rich - Thanks for the offer, but this was not for me, but for a solid state amp that Chuck was trying to repair for a friend. If you look back you may see a post that Chuck made that included the schematic. The transistors that were defective were used as? simple Miller effect C multipliers in the power supply.? That is why Ge or Si did not matter in the application even though the originals were Ge. Regardless, I am not going to repeat all the previous posts, but appreciate your offer. Regards - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Rich [mailto:rjlfirst at msn.com] Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 8:42 AM To: Mike Feher; 'Chuck'; njarc at mailman.qth.net; 'Al Klase' Subject: Re: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier Mike, Right on. I didn't see the schematic. For some reason I thought that you guys were referring to an early transistorized car radio.? I may have mixed up a couple of emails. But I would be happy to take a look at the schematic if things don't work out for you. Rich L. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Feher" Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:48 PM To: "'Chuck'" ; "'Rich'" ; ; "'Al Klase'" Subject: RE: [NJARC] Knight KX-60 Amplifier I do not believe that Rich read the earlier emails and saw the schematic of where these are used. So, I did not comment on his post. Let us know Chuck. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From radiorich at prodigy.net Tue Jun 14 19:17:29 2016 From: radiorich at prodigy.net (RICHARD LEE) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin seriously ill References: <884830683.2645809.1465946249930.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <884830683.2645809.1465946249930.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Greetings fellow enthusiasts, I just received word that? NJARC Charter Member, Jerry Simkin has been hospitalized in serious condition.? I will keep you posted as soon as I hear of any news...in the mean time, have positive thoughts for Jerry.? Regards,? Richard Lee Pres. NJARC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From trainbee at aol.com Wed Jun 15 10:45:43 2016 From: trainbee at aol.com (TrainBee) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:45:43 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] International Vacuum Tube Museum Message-ID: <15554866bc0-7374-5648@webprd-m27.mail.aol.com> I got this through the Heathkit Yahoo Group. Eventually, they will have a newsletter in electronic and paper. Have a look at: http://vacuumtubemuseum.org/filling-the-vacuum/ Joe Devonshire -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n4fs at eozinc.com Wed Jun 15 11:04:14 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:04:14 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] International Vacuum Tube Museum Message-ID: <010601d1c717$2eee27f0$8cca77d0$@eozinc.com> In my opinion, the guy is a charlatan. He has been flooding a lot of reflectors, specifically the TCA one, where most question his intentions. It is obvious he knows nothing about tubes, and is only looking for donations and another notch in his belt. He is a real narcissist. Check our his LinkedIn profile. Regards - Mike https://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesfrancisbacon?authType=NAME_SEARCH&authTok en=0XKK&locale=en_US&srchid=122487451466002326139&srchindex=9&srchtotal=104& trk=vsrp_people_res_name&trkInfo Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 From n2yeg at optonline.net Wed Jun 15 14:05:24 2016 From: n2yeg at optonline.net (Bill Zukowski) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:05:24 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times Message-ID: https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ From n2yeg at optonline.net Wed Jun 15 14:10:42 2016 From: n2yeg at optonline.net (Bill Zukowski) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:10:42 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <13a1f509-14c6-baf3-d6fa-7f92cee162d9@optonline.net> Forgot to sign. Bill Zukowski On 6/15/2016 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ > > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From billoradio at aol.com Wed Jun 15 15:04:28 2016 From: billoradio at aol.com (William Overbeck) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:04:28 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: <13a1f509-14c6-baf3-d6fa-7f92cee162d9@optonline.net> Message-ID: <15555734d7e-7efb-68d1@webprd-a91.mail.aol.com> Now I can retire !!! -----Original Message----- From: Bill Zukowski To: NJARC Sent: Wed, Jun 15, 2016 2:10 pm Now I S+cubject: Re: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Forgot to sign. Bill Zukowski On 6/15/2016 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ > > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From retevis at comcast.net Wed Jun 15 16:22:29 2016 From: retevis at comcast.net (Retevis) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:22:29 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: <15555734d7e-7efb-68d1@webprd-a91.mail.aol.com> References: <15555734d7e-7efb-68d1@webprd-a91.mail.aol.com> Message-ID: I wonder who they are buying them from and what they are paying them? Best wishes. Bob Tevis Sent from Bob's iPhone > On Jun 15, 2016, at 3:04 PM, William Overbeck via NJARC wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Now I can retire !!! > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Zukowski > To: NJARC > Sent: Wed, Jun 15, 2016 2:10 pm > Now I S+cubject: Re: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Forgot to sign. > > Bill Zukowski > > > On 6/15/2016 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: > > Just remember > > Reply = Poster > > Reply All = Everyone > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > NJARC mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From klancer2 at comcast.net Wed Jun 15 16:54:32 2016 From: klancer2 at comcast.net (Harry Klancer) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:54:32 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: References: <15555734d7e-7efb-68d1@webprd-a91.mail.aol.com> Message-ID: <9548bb74-a1a2-407e-7438-0b8735f1d74c@comcast.net> Bill, et al, I'm not an expert, but that's not a 500 anything. It may be a 600 - it looks a lot like my B600 for which I paid $125 and about 6 hours of labor. For that price, they should at least get the designation correct. Or maybe I'm wrong, Maybe it's an EXTREMELY RARE - even one-of-a-kind - 500-series with a slide rule dial - but I don't think so. Harry K On 6/15/2016 4:22 PM, Retevis wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > > > I wonder who they are buying them from and what they are paying them? > Best wishes. > Bob Tevis > > Sent from Bob's iPhone > > On Jun 15, 2016, at 3:04 PM, William Overbeck via NJARC > > wrote: > >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> Now I can retire !!! >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bill Zukowski > >> To: NJARC > >> Sent: Wed, Jun 15, 2016 2:10 pm >> Now I S+cubject: Re: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times >> >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> Forgot to sign. >> >> Bill Zukowski >> >> >> On 6/15/2016 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: >> > Just remember >> > Reply = Poster >> > Reply All = Everyone >> > >> > _________________________________________________________ >> > >> https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ >> >> > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________ >> > NJARC mailing list >> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc >> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net >> > >> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> NJARC mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> NJARC mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From n3ibx at verizon.net Wed Jun 15 17:39:17 2016 From: n3ibx at verizon.net (N3IBX) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:39:17 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times Message-ID: <24574080.1209025.1466026757669.JavaMail.root@vms170029.mailsrvcs.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ahunter01 at comcast.net Wed Jun 15 19:57:26 2016 From: ahunter01 at comcast.net (Aaron Hunter) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:57:26 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5761EB66.3080308@comcast.net> My leather one must be worth 10 times that! LOL Aaron Hunter Bill Zukowski wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ > > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > From dino66 at optonline.net Wed Jun 15 21:18:58 2016 From: dino66 at optonline.net (Robert Bennett) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:18:58 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5BFFEDB3-0760-4974-A84F-A7228A1966FA@optonline.net> Well Bill - Here?s the scoop. This IS a 600 series Trans-Oceanic. The 500 series (G500,H500) had ?airplane? style tuning, not the horizontal ?sweep? tuning. The letter ?L? refers to the year of manufacture. ?L? would indicate 1954 not 1952. Now to really confuse you, the real L600 did not have a headphone jack in front as shown in the picture (it was on the rear of the chassis. So, this radio is either a R600/1955, T600/1956, or Y600/1957. There was no S,U,V, W,or X year designates. A600, and B600 radios (like N3iBX Joe?s) have a 4 to 9 MC band, where the R,S, and T series radios had the 4 to 8 MC band. By the way, on a good day this radio is worth $150.00 US. Bob Bennett A.K.A. - ?Radiowild? Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast and 1L6 collector. On Jun 15, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From extrablues at nyc.rr.com Wed Jun 15 22:34:29 2016 From: extrablues at nyc.rr.com (extrablues at nyc.rr.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:34:29 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: <5BFFEDB3-0760-4974-A84F-A7228A1966FA@optonline.net> References: <5BFFEDB3-0760-4974-A84F-A7228A1966FA@optonline.net> Message-ID: Wow, those NY Times readers really know how to spend money. Maybe I should list my restored G500 for 3-grand! Ha!! > On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Robert Bennett wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Well Bill - > Here?s the scoop. This IS a 600 series Trans-Oceanic. The 500 series (G500,H500) had ?airplane? style tuning, not the horizontal ?sweep? tuning. The letter ?L? refers to the year of manufacture. ?L? would indicate 1954 not 1952. Now to really confuse you, the real L600 did not have a headphone jack in front as shown in the picture (it was on the rear of the chassis. So, this radio is either a R600/1955, T600/1956, or Y600/1957. There was no S,U,V, W,or X year designates. A600, and B600 radios (like N3iBX Joe?s) have a 4 to 9 MC band, where the R,S, and T series radios had the 4 to 8 MC band. By the way, on a good day this radio is worth $150.00 US. > > Bob Bennett A.K.A. - ?Radiowild? > > Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast and 1L6 collector. > On Jun 15, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: > >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> NJARC mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From radiograveyard at aol.com Wed Jun 15 23:03:24 2016 From: radiograveyard at aol.com (radiograveyard at aol.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:03:24 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1555729ca92-6e23-8122@webprd-m55.mail.aol.com> Just remember its THE NEW YORK TIMES!!!!! Read by actors singers producers dope peddlers numbers writers pimps etc. Many of these people (they perhaps do not deserve the term) they none the less have lots of $$$$$$ and buy on a whim so its the bigger fool theory If you can catch a moron with money its a deal. -----Original Message----- From: extrablues To: Robert Bennett Cc: NJARC Sent: Wed, Jun 15, 2016 10:35 pm Subject: Re: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Wow, those NY Times readers really know how to spend money. Maybe I should list my restored G500 for 3-grand! Ha!! > On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Robert Bennett wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Well Bill - > Here?s the scoop. This IS a 600 series Trans-Oceanic. The 500 series (G500,H500) had ?airplane? style tuning, not the horizontal ?sweep? tuning. The letter ?L? refers to the year of manufacture. ?L? would indicate 1954 not 1952. Now to really confuse you, the real L600 did not have a headphone jack in front as shown in the picture (it was on the rear of the chassis. So, this radio is either a R600/1955, T600/1956, or Y600/1957. There was no S,U,V, W,or X year designates. A600, and B600 radios (like N3iBX Joe?s) have a 4 to 9 MC band, where the R,S, and T series radios had the 4 to 8 MC band. By the way, on a good day this radio is worth $150.00 US. > > Bob Bennett A.K.A. - ?Radiowild? > > Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast and 1L6 collector. > On Jun 15, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: > >> Just remember >> Reply = Poster >> Reply All = Everyone >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> NJARC mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From retevis at comcast.net Wed Jun 15 23:05:11 2016 From: retevis at comcast.net (Retevis) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:05:11 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: <1555729ca92-6e23-8122@webprd-m55.mail.aol.com> References: <1555729ca92-6e23-8122@webprd-m55.mail.aol.com> Message-ID: Back to my original question. I wonder who they are buying them from and what they are paying them? You should be selling to them. Best wishes. Bob Sent from Bob's iPhone > On Jun 15, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Pete Grave via NJARC wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Just remember its THE NEW YORK TIMES!!!!! Read by actors singers producers dope peddlers numbers writers pimps etc. Many of these people (they perhaps do not deserve the term) they none the less have lots of $$$$$$ and buy on a whim so its the bigger fool theory If you can catch a moron with money its a deal. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: extrablues > To: Robert Bennett > Cc: NJARC > Sent: Wed, Jun 15, 2016 10:35 pm > Subject: Re: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Wow, those NY Times readers really know how to spend money. Maybe I should list my restored G500 for 3-grand! Ha!! > > > > On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Robert Bennett wrote: > > > > Just remember > > Reply = Poster > > Reply All = Everyone > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Well Bill - > > Here?s the scoop. This IS a 600 series Trans-Oceanic. The 500 series (G500,H500) had ?airplane? style tuning, not the horizontal ?sweep? tuning. The letter ?L? refers to the year of manufacture. ?L? would indicate 1954 not 1952. Now to really confuse you, the real L600 did not have a headphone jack in front as shown in the picture (it was on the rear of the chassis. So, this radio is either a R600/1955, T600/1956, or Y600/1957. There was no S,U,V, W,or X year designates. A600, and B600 radios (like N3iBX Joe?s) have a 4 to 9 MC band, where the R,S, and T series radios had the 4 to 8 MC band. By the way, on a good day this radio is worth $150.00 US. > > > > Bob Bennett A.K.A. - ?Radiowild? > > > > Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast and 1L6 collector. > > On Jun 15, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: > > > >> Just remember > >> Reply = Poster > >> Reply All = Everyone > >> > >> _________________________________________________________ > >> https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ > >> > >> ______________________________________________________________ > >> NJARC mailing list > >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > >> > >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > NJARC mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n3ibx at verizon.net Thu Jun 16 01:21:25 2016 From: n3ibx at verizon.net (N3IBX) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:21:25 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times Message-ID: <4488149.648496.1466054485380.JavaMail.root@vznit170182.mailsrvcs.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From antqradio at sbcglobal.net Thu Jun 16 02:33:32 2016 From: antqradio at sbcglobal.net (antqradio at sbcglobal.net) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 06:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: <4488149.648496.1466054485380.JavaMail.root@vznit170182.mailsrvcs.net> References: <4488149.648496.1466054485380.JavaMail.root@vznit170182.mailsrvcs.net> Message-ID: <286717775.4368328.1466058812198.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Strange, didn't realize that the Strato-World used the 1L6. ?I don't believe RCA made either the 1L6 or the predecessor, the 1LA6. ?I would have thought that RCA would have used all RCA tubes in the design. ?Guess the 1L6 ?had a wider frequency range then other battery powered pentagrid converters. ?Anyone know for sure?Jim From: N3IBX To: dino66 at optonline.net Cc: NJARC at mailman.qth.net Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:21 AM Subject: Re: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times Hello Bob and All,? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?I noticed in your salutation (which I really like!) that you state you are a "Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast and 1L6 collector.".. ?A very wise man once told me to save any 1L6 I might happen to find and not try to peddle them on ebay or elsewhere. I have one used tested good one in my tube inventory that I found while going through my tubes one day which I did in fact hold on to.? I picked up a RCA "Strato-World", Transoceanic clone sometime ago that I'm finally getting around to making it operational again. When purchased I discovered that it wasn't operational. Fast-Forward to the current time. When trying to diagnose it's problems and re-capping it I found it had a bad 1L6 in it. Luckily I remembered where I had my "used tested good" 1L6 and now the Strato-World now plays again.? I'm glad I took that man's advice! Otherwise I may have had to pay more for one than I originally paid for the set.? Just another 1L6 story. Thanks for reading it! Best regards and save your 1L6's! Now for me to find another for my collection................... Joe Cro N3IBX? ??On 06/15/16, Robert Bennett wrote:?Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Well Bill - Heres the scoop. This IS a 600 series Trans-Oceanic. The 500 series (G500,H500) had airplane style tuning, not the horizontal sweep tuning. The letter L refers to the year of manufacture. L would indicate 1954 not 1952. Now to really confuse you, the real L600 did not have a headphone jack in front as shown in the picture (it was on the rear of the chassis. So, this radio is either a R600/1955, T600/1956, or Y600/1957. There was no S,U,V, W,or X year designates. A600, and B600 radios (like N3iBX Joes) have a 4 to 9 MC band, where the R,S, and T series radios had the 4 to 8 MC band. By the way, on a good day this radio is worth $150.00 US. Bob Bennett A.K.A. - Radiowild Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast and 1L6 collector. On Jun 15, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n3ibx at verizon.net Thu Jun 16 03:14:52 2016 From: n3ibx at verizon.net (N3IBX) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:14:52 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times Message-ID: <31128969.1209603.1466061292882.JavaMail.root@vznit170136.mailsrvcs.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dsnellman at comcast.net Thu Jun 16 07:34:12 2016 From: dsnellman at comcast.net (David Snellman) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:34:12 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: <286717775.4368328.1466058812198.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <4488149.648496.1466054485380.JavaMail.root@vznit170182.mailsrvcs.net> <286717775.4368328.1466058812198.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: The Strato-World definitely did use a 1L6 - just the ZTO's. Not certain on the Hallicrafters. Hallicrafters did make another portable -the S72. That one has full coverage to 30 MHz along with a BFO. It did not use a 1L6. It used a 1R5. Had one of those sets and it worked rather well - even on the higher frequencies. Dave Snellman DVHRC/NJARC Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 16, 2016, at 2:33 AM, wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Strange, didn't realize that the Strato-World used the 1L6. I don't believe RCA made either the 1L6 or the predecessor, the 1LA6. I would have thought that RCA would have used all RCA tubes in the design. Guess the 1L6 had a wider frequency range then other battery powered pentagrid converters. Anyone know for sure? > Jim > > > From: N3IBX > To: dino66 at optonline.net > Cc: NJARC at mailman.qth.net > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:21 AM > Subject: Re: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times > > Hello Bob and All, > I noticed in your salutation (which I really like!) that you state you are a "Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast and 1L6 collector.".. A very wise man once told me to save any 1L6 I might happen to find and not try to peddle them on ebay or elsewhere. I have one used tested good one in my tube inventory that I found while going through my tubes one day which I did in fact hold on to. > > I picked up a RCA "Strato-World", Transoceanic clone sometime ago that I'm finally getting around to making it operational again. When purchased I discovered that it wasn't operational. Fast-Forward to the current time. When trying to diagnose it's problems and re-capping it I found it had a bad 1L6 in it. Luckily I remembered where I had my "used tested good" 1L6 and now the Strato-World now plays again. > > I'm glad I took that man's advice! Otherwise I may have had to pay more for one than I originally paid for the set. > > Just another 1L6 story. Thanks for reading it! > > Best regards and save your 1L6's! Now for me to find another for my collection................... > > Joe Cro N3IBX > > > > > On 06/15/16, Robert Bennett wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Well Bill - > Heres the scoop. This IS a 600 series Trans-Oceanic. The 500 series (G500,H500) had airplane style tuning, not the horizontal sweep tuning. The letter L refers to the year of manufacture. L would indicate 1954 not 1952. Now to really confuse you, the real L600 did not have a headphone jack in front as shown in the picture (it was on the rear of the chassis. So, this radio is either a R600/1955, T600/1956, or Y600/1957. There was no S,U,V, W,or X year designates. A600, and B600 radios (like N3iBX Joes) have a 4 to 9 MC band, where the R,S, and T series radios had the 4 to 8 MC band. By the way, on a good day this radio is worth $150.00 US. > > Bob Bennett A.K.A. - Radiowild > > Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast and 1L6 collector. > On Jun 15, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski wrote: > > > Just remember > > Reply = Poster > > Reply All = Everyone > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > NJARC mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dino66 at optonline.net Thu Jun 16 10:26:20 2016 From: dino66 at optonline.net (Robert Bennett) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:26:20 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] 1L6 Tubes Message-ID: <000701d1c7db$0d821850$288648f0$@net> More useless 1L6 info...... Chances were pretty good that if you owned multi band portable in the fifties, my estimate would be 60/40 your radio had one. Dave the Hallicrafters TW-1000 and TW2000 used one. Neat radios, came in stag and leather (looking) cases like Zenith. Other sets included - Stromberg Carlson AWP-8 - Came in various color coverings. Had temperature and humidity gauges as well. Sears Silvertone 5226 and 5227. Zenith G503 AM only portable - Don't know why Zenith did that? But they did! I'm sure there's others. My brain ran out of memory for now..... Need a "ram" upgrade lol! Bob B. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dsnellman at comcast.net Thu Jun 16 11:14:12 2016 From: dsnellman at comcast.net (Dave Snellman) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:14:12 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] 1L6 Tubes In-Reply-To: <000701d1c7db$0d821850$288648f0$@net> References: <000701d1c7db$0d821850$288648f0$@net> Message-ID: Hi Bob, yes I remember the TW2000 (leather version of the TW1000) used 1L6. Also, had a TW600 that used the same tube. I have a couple of RCA sets, listed as "long distance" sets that used a 1L6 also - actually bought one for $20 just to get the 1L6! All seem to work better on batteries than on AC. I know Zenith had a crappy AC power supply. I liked the "turret-tuned" bandswitching arrangement used by Hallicrafters versus the "push-buttons" used by Zenith. Also, RCA had a sweet-looking leather case. Not certain why Zenith was more popular than the others, or why I sold off these look-a-likes and kept the Zeniths... Dave Snellman Sent from my iPad > On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:26 AM, Robert Bennett wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > More useless 1L6 info...... > > Chances were pretty good that if you owned multi band portable in the fifties, my estimate would be 60/40 your radio had one. > > Dave the Hallicrafters TW-1000 and TW2000 used one. Neat radios, came in stag and leather (looking) cases like Zenith. > > Other sets included - > > Stromberg Carlson AWP-8 - Came in various color coverings. Had temperature and humidity gauges as well. > > Sears Silvertone 5226 and 5227. > > Zenith G503 AM only portable - Don't know why Zenith did that? But they did! > > I'm sure there's others. My brain ran out of memory for now..... Need a "ram" upgrade lol! > > Bob B. > > Virus-free > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n3ibx at verizon.net Thu Jun 16 11:26:59 2016 From: n3ibx at verizon.net (N3IBX) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:26:59 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [NJARC] 1L6 Tubes Message-ID: <3250115.1236065.1466090819849.JavaMail.root@vznit170130.mailsrvcs.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jwkoest at charter.net Thu Jun 16 14:44:34 2016 From: jwkoest at charter.net (Joe Koester) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:44:34 -0500 Subject: [NJARC] 1L6 Tubes In-Reply-To: References: <000701d1c7db$0d821850$288648f0$@net> Message-ID: <003b01d1c7ff$20bb9fd0$6232df70$@charter.net> All this talk on 1L6's and Zenith TO's reminds me that I need a couple of parts to complete an early Zenith "Bomber" TO. Looking for: 1. an escutcheon that covers the tone control buttons 2. A rod antenna 3. A wavemagnet antenna 4. A front cover Help with any of these would be greatly appreciated. Joe Koester (jwkoest at charter.net) -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dave Snellman Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:14 AM To: Robert Bennett Cc: NJARC at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] 1L6 Tubes Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From radiorich at prodigy.net Thu Jun 16 18:05:03 2016 From: radiorich at prodigy.net (radiorich) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:05:03 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin in hospice Message-ID: Greetings Fellow Enthusiasts...just to inform you that Jerry is now in hospice care. I spoke with Marsha, he is not suffering...keep him and Marsha in your thoughts....Richard Lee Pres. NJARC Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ahunter01 at comcast.net Thu Jun 16 18:16:09 2016 From: ahunter01 at comcast.net (Aaron Hunter) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:16:09 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: <31128969.1209603.1466061292882.JavaMail.root@vznit170136.mailsrvcs.net> References: <31128969.1209603.1466061292882.JavaMail.root@vznit170136.mailsrvcs.net> Message-ID: <57632529.3090509@comcast.net> I have a Silvertone 7226 Wayfarer that uses the 1L6. Manufactured by Warwick Electronics Inc. Several years ago, I purchased at auction, a 500 series T/O missing the front cover. But it had all its tubes plus the spares. Be my luck that both 1L6s are bad. Aaron Hunter N3IBX wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Jim, > I second your query on the Strato-World using the 1L6. I think > RCA made two versions of the set, and the one I have is the earlier > one, model # 3-BX-671 from 1954. > > I'm curious if the Hallicrafters T/O knockoff also used the IL6 > pentagrid converter as well. I remember being over Bob Bennett's house > and seeing a real knocked-out beauty of one in his radio workshop at > the time. The set Bob had there had real "eye-appeal", but am now > curious if it had the aforementioned pentagrid converter in it. > > Speaking of the Transoceanic, I think Bob also had the brown leather > version that may have been a A600, or a R600. I forget which variant > it was at the present time. It was the first one I remember seeing of > it's kind and left a real positive impression on me. > > Best regards, > Joe Cro N3IBX > > > On 06/16/16, antqradio at sbcglobal.net wrote: > > Strange, didn't realize that the Strato-World used the 1L6. I don't > believe RCA made either the 1L6 or the predecessor, the 1LA6. I would > have thought that RCA would have used all RCA tubes in the design. > Guess the 1L6 had a wider frequency range then other battery powered > pentagrid converters. Anyone know for sure? > Jim > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* N3IBX > > *To:* dino66 at optonline.net > *Cc:* NJARC at mailman.qth.net > *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:21 AM > *Subject:* Re: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times > > Hello Bob and All, > I noticed in your salutation (which I > really like!) that you state you are a "Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast > and 1L6 collector.".. A very wise man once told me to save any 1L6 I > might happen to find and not try to peddle them on ebay or elsewhere. > I have one used tested good one in my tube inventory that I found > while going through my tubes one day which I did in fact hold on to. > > I picked up a RCA "Strato-World", Transoceanic clone sometime ago that > I'm finally getting around to making it operational again. When > purchased I discovered that it wasn't operational. Fast-Forward to the > current time. When trying to diagnose it's problems and re-capping it > I found it had a bad 1L6 in it. Luckily I remembered where I had my > "used tested good" 1L6 and now the Strato-World now plays again. > > I'm glad I took that man's advice! Otherwise I may have had to pay > more for one than I originally paid for the set. > > Just another 1L6 story. Thanks for reading it! > > Best regards and save your 1L6's! Now for me to find another for my > collection................... > > Joe Cro N3IBX > > > > > On 06/15/16, Robert Bennett > wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Well Bill - > Heres the scoop. This IS a 600 series Trans-Oceanic. The 500 series > (G500,H500) had airplane style tuning, not the horizontal sweep > tuning. The letter L refers to the year of manufacture. L would > indicate 1954 not 1952. Now to really confuse you, the real L600 did > not have a headphone jack in front as shown in the picture (it was on > the rear of the chassis. So, this radio is either a R600/1955, > T600/1956, or Y600/1957. There was no S,U,V, W,or X year designates. > A600, and B600 radios (like N3iBX Joes) have a 4 to 9 MC band, where > the R,S, and T series radios had the 4 to 8 MC band. By the way, on a > good day this radio is worth $150.00 US. > > Bob Bennett A.K.A. - Radiowild > > Tube Trans-Oceanic enthusiast and 1L6 collector. > On Jun 15, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Bill Zukowski > wrote: > > > Just remember > > Reply = Poster > > Reply All = Everyone > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > > https://www.nytimes.com/store/zenith-500l-transoceanic-restored-antique-radio-1952.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=350170230&utm_content=collectibles_antiques%20&%20rarities&utm_term=RADIO446_Zenith%20500L%20Transoceanic%20Restored%20Antique%20Radio%20-%201952&mr:referralID=2b53f6d7-3323-11e6-8cb4-005056941669&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-YO7BRDwi6Stp7T296ABEiQAD6iWMVoemAczzZqMX135_W1wjigWuUcU330g8gLB2JEZAksaAh1S8P8HAQ > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > NJARC mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ahunter01 at comcast.net Thu Jun 16 18:26:07 2016 From: ahunter01 at comcast.net (Aaron Hunter) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:26:07 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] another overpriced radio from the NY Times In-Reply-To: <57632529.3090509@comcast.net> References: <31128969.1209603.1466061292882.JavaMail.root@vznit170136.mailsrvcs.net> <57632529.3090509@comcast.net> Message-ID: <5763277F.7070202@comcast.net> Forgot to say, I only paid $15 for the T/O. Paid too much for the Silvertone, but don't remember now how much. Might have been $25 but missing both antennas. Bummer. Aaron Aaron Hunter wrote: > > I have a Silvertone 7226 Wayfarer that uses the 1L6. Manufactured by > Warwick Electronics Inc. > > Several years ago, I purchased at auction, a 500 series T/O missing > the front cover. But it had all its tubes plus the spares. Be my > luck that both 1L6s are bad. > > Aaron Hunter > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n3ibx at verizon.net Thu Jun 16 18:37:27 2016 From: n3ibx at verizon.net (N3IBX) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:37:27 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [NJARC] RCA Strato-World wavemagnet antenna WTB: Message-ID: <3072845.1235677.1466116647473.JavaMail.root@vms170031.mailsrvcs.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jameskishi at yahoo.com Fri Jun 17 08:27:36 2016 From: jameskishi at yahoo.com (James Kishi) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkins References: <1780055351.5178675.1466166456590.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1780055351.5178675.1466166456590.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Wishing Jerry and Marsha all the best. Sincerely, Ken From ark at ar88.net Fri Jun 17 09:14:07 2016 From: ark at ar88.net (Al Klase) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:14:07 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge Message-ID: <5bea9124-4760-2b04-5040-8d484785fe0c@ar88.net> Folks, This picture has been kicking around the Web for some time, but there seems to be no credible information about it. * Are these guys German or French or what? * Military or police? * What does the sign say? * Can you identify the equipment or tube type? * What exactly is going on? -- Al Klase ? N3FRQ Jersey City, NJ http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 125587828504257997.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 23145 bytes Desc: not available URL: From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 17 09:27:34 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:27:34 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge In-Reply-To: <5bea9124-4760-2b04-5040-8d484785fe0c@ar88.net> References: <5bea9124-4760-2b04-5040-8d484785fe0c@ar88.net> Message-ID: <015901d1c89c$02d2d540$08787fc0$@eozinc.com> Well, you are asking the right questions, and therefore evidently narrowed your search. I too have seen the photo often and wondered. It of course looks military, and to me like French, German, Austrian, Hungarian by the uniform. I cannot read the writing, but, the few letters look French to me. Of course, as you know, the tubes are typical European style of the early '20s. Sorry, it appears I did not help at all. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Al Klase Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 9:14 AM To: NJARC at MAILMAN.QTH.NET Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From radiorich at prodigy.net Fri Jun 17 09:36:53 2016 From: radiorich at prodigy.net (radiorich) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:36:53 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin Message-ID: Greetings fellow enthusiasts.....Jerry passed away last night.....Thank You Jerry for being a founding member of the NJARC...you will ?be remembered!...Richard Lee Pres.NJARC Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jwkoest at charter.net Fri Jun 17 10:01:39 2016 From: jwkoest at charter.net (Joe Koester) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:01:39 -0500 Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000f01d1c8a0$c5613620$5023a260$@charter.net> So sorry to hear of Jerry's passing. I met he and Marsha many years ago at a meeting of the Mid-Atlantic Antique Radio Club in Maryland. He may have visited my home and saw a Walton set that I was so proud of. Next time I saw him he gave me some sheet music from the Waltons to go with the radio. Very thoughtful and a very nice fellow. RIP -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of radiorich Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 8:37 AM To: Reflector Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From radiograveyard at aol.com Fri Jun 17 10:18:41 2016 From: radiograveyard at aol.com (radiograveyard at aol.com) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:18:41 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1555eba6259-5f35-d19@webprd-m55.mail.aol.com> God Speed Jerry may you rest in peace you will be missed Jan & Pete -----Original Message----- From: radiorich To: Reflector Sent: Fri, Jun 17, 2016 9:37 am Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Greetings fellow enthusiasts.....Jerry passed away last night.....Thank You Jerry for being a founding member of the NJARC...you will be remembered!...Richard Lee Pres.NJARC Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From raydio862 at verizon.net Fri Jun 17 12:22:46 2016 From: raydio862 at verizon.net (Raymond F Chase) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:22:46 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge In-Reply-To: <5bea9124-4760-2b04-5040-8d484785fe0c@ar88.net> References: <5bea9124-4760-2b04-5040-8d484785fe0c@ar88.net> Message-ID: <000201d1c8b4$7c987610$75c96230$@verizon.net> I have seen that picture around and others in a similar vein on postcards. I would classify it as a "fantasy" picture staged in the early days of radio/wireless as a spoof or possibly a lighthearted prediction of what was to come. Ray -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Al Klase Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 9:14 AM To: NJARC at MAILMAN.QTH.NET Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From n2yeg at optonline.net Fri Jun 17 12:29:26 2016 From: n2yeg at optonline.net (Bill Zukowski) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:29:26 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge In-Reply-To: <000201d1c8b4$7c987610$75c96230$@verizon.net> References: <5bea9124-4760-2b04-5040-8d484785fe0c@ar88.net> <000201d1c8b4$7c987610$75c96230$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <044b5d53-6864-99b4-cfda-4704a906cac2@optonline.net> It's a candidate for some creative captions. Here's an idea - how about submissions to Marvin, for the Reflector, of early radio pictures with humorous captions. Bill On 6/17/2016 12:22 PM, Raymond F Chase wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > I have seen that picture around and others in a similar vein on postcards. > I would classify it as a "fantasy" picture staged in the early days of > radio/wireless as a spoof or possibly a lighthearted prediction of what was > to come. > Ray > > -----Original Message----- > From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Al Klase > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 9:14 AM > To: NJARC at MAILMAN.QTH.NET > Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From ark at ar88.net Fri Jun 17 12:29:36 2016 From: ark at ar88.net (Al Klase) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:29:36 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Fwd: Picture Challenge In-Reply-To: <15667906.1263981.1466170526537.JavaMail.root@vznit170116.mailsrvcs.net> References: <15667906.1263981.1466170526537.JavaMail.root@vznit170116.mailsrvcs.net> Message-ID: Please "REPLY ALL" on these so the group can digest them. - Al -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Picture Challenge Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:35:26 -0500 (CDT) From: N3IBX To: ark at ar88.net Hello Al, I too have wondered about the very picture in question. I've seen it on various websites for a few years now. I'd take a "SWAG" that it was French, but can't quite make out the writing on it. Possibly the large eagle may signify that it iis from the old Ottoman Empire, "Austria-Hungary", I really don't know. The radio set looks to be from the 1920's, the way it is built, but the picture itself has WW1 written all over it. I think it os too advanced to be from WWI though and looks to be something made in the early 1920's. The tubes look to me to be of the "LS" variety. Another SWAG on my part. Please let me know if you find out anything about it. With the help of Goprdon,W3GK, I got my FB-XA and accompanying PSK preselector working very well. You can even copy SSB signals pretty fairly on it. Sensitivity is about 1 microvolt on AM and CW, not too shabby says I! I hope all is well. Best regards, Joe On 06/17/16, Al Klase wrote: Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Folks, This picture has been kicking around the Web for some time, but there seems to be no credible information about it. * Are these guys German or French or what? * Military or police? * What does the sign say? * Can you identify the equipment or tube type? * What exactly is going on? -- Al Klase ??? N3FRQ Jersey City, NJ http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Folks, This picture has been kicking around the Web for some time, but there seems to be no credible information about it. * Are these guys German or French or what? * Military or police? * What does the sign say? * Can you identify the equipment or tube type? * What exactly is going on? -- Al Klase ? N3FRQJersey City, NJhttp://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n2yeg at optonline.net Fri Jun 17 12:32:33 2016 From: n2yeg at optonline.net (Bill Zukowski) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:32:33 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge In-Reply-To: <000201d1c8b4$7c987610$75c96230$@verizon.net> References: <5bea9124-4760-2b04-5040-8d484785fe0c@ar88.net> <000201d1c8b4$7c987610$75c96230$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <3d778070-eda0-6d4c-41e3-532c486f8606@optonline.net> Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ It's a candidate for some creative captions. Here's an idea - how about submissions to Marvin, for the Reflector, of early radio pictures with humorous captions. Bill On 6/17/2016 12:22 PM, Raymond F Chase wrote: > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > I have seen that picture around and others in a similar vein on postcards. > I would classify it as a "fantasy" picture staged in the early days of > radio/wireless as a spoof or possibly a lighthearted prediction of what was > to come. > Ray > > -----Original Message----- > From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Al Klase > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 9:14 AM > To: NJARC at MAILMAN.QTH.NET > Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From a.b.magoun at ieee.org Fri Jun 17 12:32:00 2016 From: a.b.magoun at ieee.org (Alex Magoun) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:32:00 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Picture Challenge Message-ID: Al, Since the fellow on the right could be inspector Clouseau's father, I'm inclined to think it's French, from either WWI or shortly after. Another French radio with four tubes is here, http://www.radiomuseum.org/r/inconnu_receive_4_tmc_valves.html, originally from the April-May 1920 issue of the French magazine, La Science et La Vie ( http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6545435n/f42.item.r=.zoom, go to p. 424 within the long article on "The Progress of TSF [Transmission sans Fil, or wireless transmission] during the War" that starts on p. 413). The set in your mystery photo also doesn't seem to be on the Radiomuseum's page of French military radios either: http://www.radiomuseum.org/m/mil-fr_f_en_1.html. Searches using my proprietary collection of multilingual search terms didn't come close to finding your photo, so it's back in your court! best, Alex ~~~ Alexander B. Magoun, Ph.D., Outreach Historian IEEE History Center Samuel C. Williams Library 3rd Floor Stevens Institute of Technology 1 Castle Point Terrace Hoboken NJ 07030-5991 USA +1 732-981-3414 a.b.magoun at ieee.org www.ethw.org @IEEEHistory www.ieee.org/history_center IEEE - Advancing Technology for Humanity -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.b.magoun at ieee.org Fri Jun 17 12:40:41 2016 From: a.b.magoun at ieee.org (Alex Magoun) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:40:41 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin Message-ID: I always appreciated Jerry's helpfulness, with and without his devoted Marsha. How he found the books and publications he offered without using the internet is a marvel and mystery of human ingenuity. Together he and Marsha were warm companions at the Antiques Wireless Association meetings, and they were not only founding members of the NJARC, but the first paying Friends of the David Sarnoff Library, for which I was deeply grateful. Thank you, Jerry, for all that you've been and done. Alex ~~~ Alexander B. Magoun, Ph.D., Outreach Historian IEEE History Center Samuel C. Williams Library 3rd Floor Stevens Institute of Technology 1 Castle Point Terrace Hoboken NJ 07030-5991 USA +1 732-981-3414 a.b.magoun at ieee.org www.ethw.org @IEEEHistory www.ieee.org/history_center IEEE - Advancing Technology for Humanity -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From salb203 at aol.com Fri Jun 17 12:53:41 2016 From: salb203 at aol.com (Sal Brisindi) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:53:41 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: May you rest in peace Jerry and my condolences to Marsha. Sal -----Original Message----- From: "radiorich" Sent: ?6/?17/?2016 9:37 AM To: "Reflector" Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin Greetings fellow enthusiasts.....Jerry passed away last night.....Thank You Jerry for being a founding member of the NJARC...you will be remembered!...Richard Lee Pres.NJARC Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nyc.tomas.1010 at gmail.com Fri Jun 17 13:20:53 2016 From: nyc.tomas.1010 at gmail.com (Tomas L) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:20:53 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] WW ONE spy radio Message-ID: *http://earlyradiohistory.us/1917spy.htm The Electrical Experimenter*, June, 1917, page 110: *Remarkable Radio Outfit Built By German Spy* [image: Max Wax] A LITTLE black box of mystery, seized recently by the police in the belief that it was nothing more than a modern adaptation of a time worn contrivance for swindling unsophisticated persons out of their savings, was revealed as a clever wireless telegraph outfit, capable of receiving messages from as far away as Berlin. Police and government experts who examined the mechanism in the box declared it to be as perfect in construction as any they ever had seen. It is (or was) the property of Max Hans Ludwig Wax, a German citizen, and graduate of the University of Berlin. Wax, as soon as he found the police had learned the real nature of the intricate contents of the box, assumed an air of stolid indifference, denied he knew the box could be of service either in sending or receiving telegraph messages or that he knew anything of telegraphy, and asserted that apparently useless bits of paraphernalia contained in the box had been placed there by him merely to make the contrivance "look pretty." Then, the police say, Wax informed prospective dupes that the little black box contained machinery devised by German scientists for reproducing American banknotes and currency bills. If he would place a one-thousand dollar bill in the "press" inside the box the contrivance would print ten duplicates of that bill. It then was the duty of the "loyal" German, the police say they were informed, to pass the spurious notes off for American gold, so that eventually this country would be flooded with counterfeit notes and persons loyal to Germany would be in possession of most of this country's gold. Just after Wax was arrested the police learned that he had left the box in a machine shop in New York City. The police finally located the box in a trunk which they said was equipt with a false bottom. It was not until Sergeant Pierce, in charge of the police wireless station, rigged up as part of the scheme for military defence by Arthur Woods, Police Commissioner, looked at the contrivance that it was recognized as a genuine and extremely effective portable wireless outfit. The box is about two and a half feet square. It is covered with black enamel and has silver handles and brass hinges and clasp. It must have cost at least $800, according to the estimate of experts. As soon as Sergeant Pierce recognized the use to which the queer arrangement might be put the outfit was rigged up, its batteries were set in motion, and in a moment the hissing sounds and sputtering and flashing sparks that attend the operation of a wireless outfit were in evidence. Wax persisted, despite the effectiveness of this demonstration, in his assertion that the batteries, tiny dynamo and intricate coils were placed in the box by him to make the apparatus "look pretty." Eventually he said he intended to use them to give color to a motion picture scenario he intended to write. Persistent questioning, however, drew from Wax, according to the police statement, the admission that he, having bought the materials, the box and its outfit were put together for him by a seaman on board one of the interned German ships lying at Hoboken. He refused to reveal the identity of the man, asserting he knew him only as "Frank" and had met him only a few times. When the examination of Wax had proceeded that far L. R. Krumm, chief radio officer of the federal government for the New York district, arrived at Police Headquarters. He examined the machinery contained in the box carefully and then verified Sergeant Pierce's declaration that it was a wireless outfit of great strength. He agreed with Sergeant Pierce that the apparatus was easily capable of receiving messages from as far away as Berlin. Both experts, however, declared the apparatus probably could not be used to send a message much farther than one hundred miles. Despite the readiness with which Mr. Krumm and the police wireless operators were able to set the wireless outfit in motion, many contrivances in the box were a mystery to them. It appeared as if there were three sets of batteries, where only one was necessary. The operators exprest the belief, however, that any one of the three battery sets might have been connected with the rest of the apparatus, so that, even if two batteries failed, there still would be power to keep the contrivance in operation. The only incomplete thing about the outfit was that the police were unable to find a sending key and a transformer, both of which would be necessary if the machine were to be used for sending wireless messages. Wax, however, is described by persons who stayed in the house where he lived as having been in the habit of carrying a small hand grip. The grip has not yet been found. After the police were satisfied of the nature of the equipment in the box they asked Wax to operate it. He fingered several parts of the mechanism for a moment or two and finally succeeded in causing a short circuit, which effectually put the whole thing out of commission. The damage, however, can be repaired easily. In the examination of Wax the police drew from him the statement that he came to this country from Germany in June, 1914. He denied he had served in the German army, asserting he was rejected for military service because he had a weak heart. Dr. Baker and Dr. Hamilton, police surgeons, were called in to examine the prisoner. They pronounced him an almost perfect physical specimen and said there was no indication that he ever had suffered from heart disease. Considerable interest was manifested by the police and federal investigators in papers and letters found in Wax's possession. They declared some were written in code. All of them were in duplicate. One of the papers, according to the police, was a draft for $12,000 and another was for 2,300 marks. The latter was drawn on the Deutsche Bank, of Berlin. It was declared by the police that Wax received some of these papers thru the office of the German Consul in this city several weeks ago. The money, the police said they learned, was sent to Wax by relatives in Germany, who the prisoner declared were both wealthy and influential there. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From retevis at comcast.net Fri Jun 17 16:17:48 2016 From: retevis at comcast.net (Retevis) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:17:48 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Fwd: Picture Challenge In-Reply-To: References: <15667906.1263981.1466170526537.JavaMail.root@vznit170116.mailsrvcs.net> Message-ID: Hey Joe My Austrian friends might object to calling Austria -Hungary the old Ottoman Empire. I think they kicked those guys out quite a long time ago. Best wishes. Bob Tevis Sent from Bob's iPhone > On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Al Klase wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Please "REPLY ALL" on these so the group can digest them. - Al > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Picture Challenge > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:35:26 -0500 (CDT) > From: N3IBX > To: ark at ar88.net > > Hello Al, > I too have wondered about the very picture in question. I've seen it on various websites for a few years now. I'd take a "SWAG" that it was French, but can't quite make out the writing on it. Possibly the large eagle may signify that it iis from the old Ottoman Empire, "Austria-Hungary", I really don't know. > > The radio set looks to be from the 1920's, the way it is built, but the picture itself has WW1 written all over it. I think it os too advanced to be from WWI though and looks to be something made in the early 1920's. > > The tubes look to me to be of the "LS" variety. Another SWAG on my part. > > Please let me know if you find out anything about it. > > With the help of Goprdon,W3GK, I got my FB-XA and accompanying PSK preselector working very well. You can even copy SSB signals pretty fairly on it. Sensitivity is about 1 microvolt on AM and CW, not too shabby says I! > > I hope all is well. > > Best regards, > Joe > > > On 06/17/16, Al Klase wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > > > Folks, > > This picture has been kicking around the Web for some time, but there > seems to be no credible information about it. > > > > * Are these guys German or French or what? > * Military or police? > * What does the sign say? > * Can you identify the equipment or tube type? > * What exactly is going on? > > -- > Al Klase ??? N3FRQ > Jersey City, NJ > http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ > > > > Folks, > > This picture has been kicking around the Web for some time, but there seems to be no credible information about it. > > > > Are these guys German or French or what? > Military or police? > What does the sign say? > Can you identify the equipment or tube type? > What exactly is going on? > -- Al Klase ? N3FRQJersey City, NJhttp://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ > > > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From retevis at comcast.net Fri Jun 17 16:19:16 2016 From: retevis at comcast.net (Retevis) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:19:16 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <050D59EC-0E7D-40A7-8317-F7F979A05AB0@comcast.net> Also sad for me as I never got to know him well since I've only been in the club a short while. May he rest in peace. Bob Tevis Sent from Bob's iPhone > On Jun 17, 2016, at 9:36 AM, radiorich wrote: > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > Greetings fellow enthusiasts.....Jerry passed away last night.....Thank You Jerry for being a founding member of the NJARC...you will be remembered!...Richard Lee Pres.NJARC > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone > ______________________________________________________________ > NJARC mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vlobosco at comcast.net Fri Jun 17 19:13:18 2016 From: vlobosco at comcast.net (vlobosco at comcast.net) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <429532466.26213797.1466205198165.JavaMail.zimbra@comcast.net> Sorry to hear about Jerrys passing. May he rest in peace. Best wishes to Marsha. Vince Lobosco ----- Original Message ----- From: "radiorich" To: "Reflector" Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 9:36:53 AM Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Greetings fellow enthusiasts.....Jerry passed away last night.....Thank You Jerry for being a founding member of the NJARC...you will be remembered!...Richard Lee Pres.NJARC Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 17 21:39:50 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:39:50 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Fwd: Picture Challenge In-Reply-To: References: <15667906.1263981.1466170526537.JavaMail.root@vznit170116.mailsrvcs.net> Message-ID: <02aa01d1c902$4ee086b0$eca19410$@eozinc.com> Well, I was born in Hungary in 1945 and came here as a refugee in 1956. My father hated the Russians since his brother died in the Russian front during WWI. Hungarians were forced into German occupation towards the end of the war. Does that mean I hate the Russians? The answer is no. No one choses where they are born and the world has been here a long time. I do not dislike anyone as long as they are decent human beings. I feel sorry for your friends who still hold any grudge, especially when they were not even a part of it. Regards - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Retevis Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 4:18 PM To: Al Klase Cc: NJARC at MAILMAN.QTH.NET Subject: Re: [NJARC] Fwd: Picture Challenge Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From retevis at comcast.net Fri Jun 17 22:59:21 2016 From: retevis at comcast.net (Retevis) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:59:21 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Fwd: Picture Challenge In-Reply-To: <02aa01d1c902$4ee086b0$eca19410$@eozinc.com> References: <15667906.1263981.1466170526537.JavaMail.root@vznit170116.mailsrvcs.net> <02aa01d1c902$4ee086b0$eca19410$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: I'm sorry if you did not understand my remark. I was being facetious--trying to point out that historically the Austria-Hungary Empire in even our grandparents era was not Ottoman. It was the Ottomans who attempted to take it over. I'm sure in reality they hold no grudges. As I certainly treasure my Austrian and German friends whose grandparents may have been in the wars against us. I agree with your statement that we must all put aside animosities if we intend to survive as a civilization. No harm intended by my remark and certainly none should have been implied. Best wishes. Bob Sent from Bob's iPhone > On Jun 17, 2016, at 9:39 PM, Mike Feher wrote: > > Well, I was born in Hungary in 1945 and came here as a refugee in 1956. My > father hated the Russians since his brother died in the Russian front during > WWI. Hungarians were forced into German occupation towards the end of the > war. Does that mean I hate the Russians? The answer is no. No one choses > where they are born and the world has been here a long time. I do not > dislike anyone as long as they are decent human beings. I feel sorry for > your friends who still hold any grudge, especially when they were not even a > part of it. Regards - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Retevis > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 4:18 PM > To: Al Klase > Cc: NJARC at MAILMAN.QTH.NET > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Fwd: Picture Challenge > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > From n4fs at eozinc.com Fri Jun 17 23:24:26 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:24:26 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Fwd: Picture Challenge In-Reply-To: References: <15667906.1263981.1466170526537.JavaMail.root@vznit170116.mailsrvcs.net> <02aa01d1c902$4ee086b0$eca19410$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <02b401d1c910$ebd612b0$c3823810$@eozinc.com> Bob - I do not believe I know you, but I understand and appreciate your reply. My reply to your initial post was also not meant be incendiary. Just an opinion from my perspective BTW, re-reading my reply, I see I typed WWI, where I really meant to type WWII. . Regards - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: Retevis [mailto:retevis at comcast.net] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 10:59 PM To: Mike Feher Cc: Al Klase; NJARC at MAILMAN.QTH.NET Subject: Re: [NJARC] Fwd: Picture Challenge I'm sorry if you did not understand my remark. I was being facetious--trying to point out that historically the Austria-Hungary Empire in even our grandparents era was not Ottoman. It was the Ottomans who attempted to take it over. I'm sure in reality they hold no grudges. As I certainly treasure my Austrian and German friends whose grandparents may have been in the wars against us. I agree with your statement that we must all put aside animosities if we intend to survive as a civilization. No harm intended by my remark and certainly none should have been implied. Best wishes. Bob Sent from Bob's iPhone > On Jun 17, 2016, at 9:39 PM, Mike Feher wrote: > > Well, I was born in Hungary in 1945 and came here as a refugee in > 1956. My father hated the Russians since his brother died in the > Russian front during WWI. Hungarians were forced into German > occupation towards the end of the war. Does that mean I hate the > Russians? The answer is no. No one choses where they are born and the > world has been here a long time. I do not dislike anyone as long as > they are decent human beings. I feel sorry for your friends who still > hold any grudge, especially when they were not even a part of it. > Regards - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of > Retevis > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 4:18 PM > To: Al Klase > Cc: NJARC at MAILMAN.QTH.NET > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Fwd: Picture Challenge > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > From dporay at optimum.net Sat Jun 18 07:36:59 2016 From: dporay at optimum.net (doug poray) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 07:36:59 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [NJARC] Jerry Simkin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4965169d.6dafb.155634cb7bb.Webtop.36@optimum.net> My thoughts and prayers go out to Marsha. I will remember Jerry for his vast knowledge of radio history and for the old books and magazines he collected. Doug Poray On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:36 AM, radiorich wrote: Just remember Reply = Posoter Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ Greetings fellow enthusiasts.....Jerry passed away last night.....Thank You Jerry for being a founding member of the NJARC...you will ?be remembered!...Richard Lee Pres.NJARC Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone ______________________________________________________________ NJARC mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From w2ads at verizon.net Mon Jun 27 18:47:58 2016 From: w2ads at verizon.net (Al Schapira) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:47:58 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Adams-Morgan Paragon Six Message-ID: <1467067678.2303.10.camel@verizon.net> I have acquired what I believe to be an Adams-Morgan Paragon Type Six. Its a 6-tube TRF. None of the A-M ads I've seen (and I have plenty) nor the Douglas book show anything like it. There are no manufactures marks on anything other than on some of the mica grid-leak capacitors. I inspected the tube sockets, knobs, dials, etc... nothing to identify a manufacturer other than "Paragon Six" on the front panel and "Paragon" on the meter face. Pretty rare to see a meter on a set this old. Don't know whether its for tuning or A-voltage adjustment. The tuning includes two ganged stages coupled with a string pulley system -- like a synchrophase. See PICT3185. Its clear that someone "has been in there" before I got it, as many of the bus wires are unattached and there are some pencil marks underneath the tube sockets. The C-battery (looks like a D-cell) is still there! Could it be a prototype that A-M never got into production? There was no cabinet. I've never seen a set with curved metal side rails before. (See PICT3185 again) Has anyone got any more info on the A-M Type Six? Anything would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, --Al, W2ADS PS I live in Montclair, NJ where the Adams-Morgan Company was located. That explains my interest in A-M products. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PICT3164.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 58627 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PICT3172.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 61379 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PICT3183.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 70713 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PICT3189.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 98194 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PICT3185.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 84227 bytes Desc: not available URL: From n3ibx at verizon.net Mon Jun 27 20:15:00 2016 From: n3ibx at verizon.net (N3IBX) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:15:00 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [NJARC] Adams-Morgan Paragon Six Message-ID: <12884679.1590792.1467072900739.JavaMail.root@vms170025.mailsrvcs.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From w2ads at verizon.net Mon Jun 27 21:54:43 2016 From: w2ads at verizon.net (Al Schapira) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 21:54:43 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Adams-Morgan Paragon Six In-Reply-To: <12884679.1590792.1467072900739.JavaMail.root@vms170025.mailsrvcs.net> References: <12884679.1590792.1467072900739.JavaMail.root@vms170025.mailsrvcs.net> Message-ID: <1467078883.2303.34.camel@verizon.net> Hi Joe, Thanks for your message and interest in the A-M Six. Through the Antique Radio Forum, I have found a reference to this set: See https://www.radioace.com/node/159 You can see the same tuning dials and knobs as on mine. The Adams-Morgan Company operated in Montclair NJ from roughly 1912 through 1929. I have several of their sets built in the early 20's. They tended to number their Paragon models in order so I guess the "Six" was made near the end of their existence. My set is cannibalized so I can't tell for sure what the circuitry was supposed to be, which is why I would love to get a schematic and/or pictures of its innards. I'll try to keep you up-to-date on progress with this set. Thanks again for your interest. 73 -Al, W2ADS www.gamma-five.com On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 19:15 -0500, N3IBX wrote: > Hello Al, Many thanks for posting the pictures and information about > your "Paragton" 6 tube TRF set. It is very interesting indeed. I > don't claim to be any sort of expert on these things, but I see a few > points of interest that may or may not be irregularaties with your > receiver. > > To begin with, it looks like your set was built in 1923 or 1924 based > upon the three RF stages and a few other points. I wonder if there is > a neutralizing condensor for each of the three stages? Just curious. > Also, the two main tuning dials look like they would be from the > period above. I can't think of the name of them offhand, but I don't > think they were used by Adams-Morgan. They may be proprietary or > added later. > > One very interesting point is the meter on the front panel. It sports > two scales, one for "A" battery voltage, and then a another scale for > "B" battery voltage with demarkations for various voltages. The meter > also has "Paragon" imprinted on it. > > Another point of interest is the tuning system used. I think it is > very advanced for the time. The first two RF stages may be the coarse > or main tuner and ganged together, with the third being a fine tuning > control. Just a wild guess on my part. > > I wonder how long Adams-Morgan was in business and what year they > went out of business. This may give a clue as to the year the set was > made. > > Unfortunately I probably didn't help with the identity of the set you > have, just possibly raised more questions about it. I'm interested in > seeing what other NJARC members have to say about it. > > Very best regards, > Joe Cro N3IBX > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n4fs at eozinc.com Mon Jun 27 22:04:07 2016 From: n4fs at eozinc.com (Mike Feher) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:04:07 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Adams-Morgan Paragon Six In-Reply-To: <12884679.1590792.1467072900739.JavaMail.root@vms170025.mailsrvcs.net> References: <12884679.1590792.1467072900739.JavaMail.root@vms170025.mailsrvcs.net> Message-ID: <00e201d1d0e1$5b6ffd20$124ff760$@eozinc.com> Al - Hate to disagree with brother Joe, but, this set is more from the later '20s than the early 20's. Easily seen by the tuning verniers shown as well as the addition of a meter. The inside layout also is a big clue. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -----Original Message----- From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of N3IBX Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 8:15 PM To: w2ads at verizon.net; njarc at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [NJARC] Adams-Morgan Paragon Six Just remember Reply = Poster Reply All = Everyone _________________________________________________________ From w2ads at verizon.net Mon Jun 27 22:11:02 2016 From: w2ads at verizon.net (Al Schapira) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:11:02 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Adams-Morgan Paragon Six In-Reply-To: <00e201d1d0e1$5b6ffd20$124ff760$@eozinc.com> References: <12884679.1590792.1467072900739.JavaMail.root@vms170025.mailsrvcs.net> <00e201d1d0e1$5b6ffd20$124ff760$@eozinc.com> Message-ID: <1467079862.2303.36.camel@verizon.net> Thanks, Mike. Agreed. See my posting which crossed yours in the mail. --Al On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 22:04 -0400, Mike Feher wrote: > Al - > > Hate to disagree with brother Joe, but, this set is more from the > later '20s > than the early 20's. Easily seen by the tuning verniers shown as well > as the > addition of a meter. The inside layout also is a big clue. 73 - Mike > > Mike B. Feher, N4FS > 89 Arnold Blvd. > Howell, NJ, 07731 > 732-886-5960 > > -----Original Message----- > From: NJARC [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of N3IBX > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 8:15 PM > To: w2ads at verizon.net; njarc at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [NJARC] Adams-Morgan Paragon Six > > Just remember > Reply = Poster > Reply All = Everyone > > _________________________________________________________ > From dino66 at optonline.net Wed Jun 29 15:58:13 2016 From: dino66 at optonline.net (Robert Bennett) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:58:13 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Got Money? Message-ID: <47135970-54AD-4301-BBB9-87D9E7D58500@optonline.net> You knew this was going to happen sooner or later! Well it?s time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5A-e5ENEDc Bob Bennett KC2RDU -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dino66 at optonline.net Thu Jun 30 10:46:52 2016 From: dino66 at optonline.net (Robert Bennett) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:46:52 -0400 Subject: [NJARC] Got Money Message-ID: <000001d1d2de$3d53cd90$b7fb68b0$@net> Sorry folks for the wrong link. This is the correct one. http://fortune.com/2016/03/30/fcc-incentive-auction/ Bob Bennett --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: