[NJARC] Why the Internet didn't kill Radio Shack
E. Suhaka
Chitose6970 at poetworld.net
Thu Apr 2 11:27:03 EDT 2015
No cellphone collecting? How about a code practice oscillator museum?
http://www.n4mw.com/cpo.htm
Ed
N2COV
On 4/1/2015 9:45 PM, David Sica wrote:
> Just remember
> Reply = Poster
> Reply All = Everyone
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Jim,
>
> Collecting cellphones? Nah, one's got to draw the line somewhere. But
> then again... I did have to keep my "bag phone" from 1985 or so. I used
> to drag it out occasionally to tease my kids when they started badgering
> me for newer, smaller phones.
>
> -- Dave
>
> Sica Productions
> 732-382-0618
> 973-873-6347
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:57 PM, <antqradio at sbcglobal.net
> <mailto:antqradio at sbcglobal.net>> wrote:
>
> Just remember
> Reply = Poster
> Reply All = Everyone
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> I can speak only for myself but I imagine that some on this list
> have had similar experiences with Radio Shack.
>
> First off, I have bought several scanners and shortwave receivers
> from them over the years and I have been happy with all of them.
> They were worth what I paid and reliability was better then average,
> in my experience. I guess up to about the year 2000 or so, buying
> components from RS was common for me. But after they concentrated
> more and more on cellphones and the like and the component shelves
> dried up, I stopped going. By then I had discovered Mouser and have
> used them and eBay for all of my component needs ever since.
>
> I don't really think that RS management was to blame, it is just the
> price of progress. When you think about it, modern electronic
> products are now no longer repairable. Pick and place surface
> mounted parts, not much bigger then ground pepper flakes, have made
> the cost to replace the end item so low that repair a thing of the
> past. Not to mention that reliability is, for the most part so high
> that one gets tired of the old cell phone or what have you long
> before it fails.
>
> When I left the cell phone industry, the cost to manufacture a phone
> was around $300. The most costly component was the six volt
> battery. The production life cycle of the cell phone was 18
> months. The first three or so months, the phone sold for $300, the
> next three or so months it was at $100 or so. In the last months of
> production, the phone was free for signing a new contract since all
> of the R&D and production cost had been recovered and a nice profit
> was made by all. Ah, the beauty of mass production!
>
> 15 years of so later, I imagine that the cost to make a cell phone
> is much lower. My Blackberry Z10, which I think is wonderful and
> intuitive to use, was free to me for a two year contract extension.
> It has an 8MB camera so I no longer have a need for the Nicon
> Coolpix 2000 camera and the GPS receiver in the car. The Z10 has
> more speed and memory then either of my first two or three PC's I
> paid a king's ransom for. It just blows my mind! And to think our
> favorite hobby is the collection and restoration of ancient vacuum
> tube radios and electronics; it is just plain crazy.
>
> Is anyone collecting cellphones? I have a few early AMPS and DAMPS
> Ericsson and other makers of cell phones, some NIB, some engineering
> samples and some with only the circuit board, free for postage. If
> InfoAge is interested, I'll throw in a cellphone schematic!
> Jim
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Alex Magoun <a.b.magoun at ieee.org <mailto:a.b.magoun at ieee.org>>
> *To:* njarc at mailman.qth.net <mailto:njarc at mailman.qth.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 1, 2015 1:18 PM
> *Subject:* [NJARC] Why the Internet didn't kill Radio Shack
>
> Per this Fortune reporter
> (http://fortune.com/2015/04/01/why-the-internet-did-not-kill-radio-shack/?xid=gn_editorspicks&google_editors_picks=true),
> though I'm curious what the profit margin is/was on selling
> components to restorers/DIYers/hackers/makers compared to cell
> phones. Besides, it was selling, or trying to sell, consumer
> electronics at least 40 years ago.
>
> Alex
> ~~~
> Alexander B. Magoun, Ph.D., Outreach Historian
> IEEE History Center
> at Stevens Institute of Technology
> Samuel C. Williams Library 3rd Floor
> Hoboken, NJ 07030-5991
> USA
>
> +1 732-981-3414 <tel:%2B1%20732-981-3414>
> a.b.magoun at ieee.org <mailto:a.b.magoun at ieee.org>
> www.ethw.org <http://www.ethw.org/>
> @IEEEHistory
> www.ieee.org/history_center <http://www.ieee.org/history_center>
>
> IEEE - Advancing Technology for Humanity
>
> Just remember
> Reply = Poster
> Reply All = Everyone
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net <mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net/>
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net <mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NJARC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
More information about the NJARC
mailing list