[NJARC] NJARC Meeting Location

[JOE CRO]

Marv,
         Good commentary from you, and input from our members. Everybody has 
a valid concern. Why don't we think about doing the following:

At a stated meeting, we could have a seperate sheet that the attendees could 
vote for their preference, for instance:

1) Sarnoff
2) InfoAge
3) Alternate between Sarnoff and infoAge
4) Summer months at Sarnoff, Winter at InfoAge
5) anything else deemed appropriate.

This is just a suggestion. Those who would be voting would be from the core 
population who attend every meeting, and who knows, we may ever flush out a 
few just to come and vote.

Just my two cents worth on how to make the situation at hand part of the 
Democratic process, and be fair to everyone.

Best Regards,
                    Joe Cro N3IBX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Mbeeferman at cs.com>
To: <njarc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 3:46 PM
Subject: [NJARC] NJARC Meeting Location


> Visit our web site - See http://www.njarc.org
> _______________________________________________
> Its been very refreshing to see some positive input into meeting location
> preferences and times.  I hope someone is collecting these ideas.   I'm 
> also glad
> this hasn't turned into a slugfest.  With regard to some who have termed
> their input "selfish," don't be so hard on yourself.  You have a valid 
> position in
> preferring one location over another...all input is welcome!
> I think its time that a Survey might be in order.  And don't stop
> commenting....it will help in coming up with Survey questions.
> Just remember - nothing is guaranteed but there's no harm in at least 
> trying
> to accomodate as many members as possible.
> As for me, I see some kind of division between Sarnoff and InfoAge, since
> both are fantastic resources that must be supported.
> _______________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> NJARC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
>