[NJARC] Overquoting

[Rob Flory]

To keep the logical flow of the thread, you really only need to quote the 
specific point you are replying to.

Scroll down to read the rest of the thread.

Rob

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <njarc-request at mailman.qth.net>
To: <njarc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 4:01 AM
Subject: NJARC Digest, Vol 45, Issue 31


> Send NJARC mailing list submissions to
> njarc at mailman.qth.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> njarc-request at mailman.qth.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> njarc-owner at mailman.qth.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of NJARC digest..."
>
>
> Visit our web site - See http://www.njarc.org
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Trim your posts, Please (Rob Flory)
>   2. Re: GE Beam-O-Scope (NICHOLAS SENKER)
>   3. Yamaha Repair (NICHOLAS SENKER)
>   4. Re: Trim your posts, Please (Dave Sica)
>   5. RE: Trim your posts, Please (Mike Feher)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:37:30 -0500
> From: "Rob Flory" <robandpj at earthlink.net>
> Subject: [NJARC] Trim your posts, Please
> To: "New Jersey Antique Radio Club" <njarc at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <000d01c85b58$d7eafb50$14d8ef04 at DGF8WDF1>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Guys,
>
> Please trim excess quoting from your messages.  For those of us reading in 
> digest form, we have to scroll through lots of quotes to find the 10 
> percent of new content.
>
> Thank you,
> Rob "Grumpy" Flory
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:02:00 -0500 (EST)
> From: NICHOLAS SENKER <ns539 at embarqmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [NJARC] GE Beam-O-Scope
> To: New Jersey Antique Radio Club <njarc at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID:
> <1008272945.1478581200848520204.JavaMail.root at md29.embarq.synacor.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I worked on this set at the clinic.  The pot in question is indeed the 
> volume control (switch is on the tone control as you state) and is 2 meg 
> ohm with a tap.  shaft is about 2 1/2"  with a half round end for the 
> knob.  We found a close match in Walt Heske's stash but without a tap. A 
> temporary hookup seemed to work but we are still looking for a closer 
> match if possible.  Let us know if you have one.  The original pot was 
> smashed so bad we couldn't make any measurements.
> Nick S
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: dino66 at optonline.net
> To: njarc at mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:38:41 -0500 (EST)
> Subject: [NJARC] GE Beam-O-Scope
>
> Visit our web site - See http://www.njarc.org
> _______________________________________________
> Al. and for anyone else interested â?" I looked through some GE 
> schematics, and it looks like GE used 2K ohm volume controls on many sets 
> (ON/OFF switch on tone control). I could not locate a 2K pot in my 
> collection. I found a 1500 ohm ½ watt but probably should be at least a 1 
> to 2 watt. This  should have a audio taper or also known as a â?oZâ? 
> taper. Hey folks! Check your stuff and see if you have something better 
> before you leave.
> 
> Thanks, Bob B.
> _______________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> NJARC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:37:25 -0500 (EST)
> From: NICHOLAS SENKER <ns539 at embarqmail.com>
> Subject: [NJARC] Yamaha Repair
> To: njarc at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID:
> <965076081.1509331200861445022.JavaMail.root at md29.embarq.synacor.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> A fellow approached me at the clinic and asked if I could repair his 
> Yamaha CR-600 stereo receiver, circa 1975.  I told him I didn't work on 
> solid state components but would post his request here. His name is Jon 
> Wonnell and he is from Princeton Junction.  His email is 
> wonnell at pacific.net.sg
> If anyone out there is interested in this repair job, or can refer Jon to 
> someone that does this type of repair please contact him.  He says this 
> component is of sentimental value to him.
> Nick Senker
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:29:09 -0500
> From: Dave Sica <davesica at juno.com>
> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Trim your posts, Please
> To: njarc at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <20080120.212910.3596.2.davesica at juno.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:37:30 -0500 "Rob Flory" <robandpj at earthlink.net>
> writes:
>> Please trim excess quoting from your messages.  For those of us
>> reading in digest form, we have to scroll through lots of quotes to
>> find the 10 percent of new content.
>> Thank you,
>> Rob "Grumpy" Flory
>
> A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
>
> Q. And why is "top posting" also considered bad form?
>
> Cheers, Grumpy Jr.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:44:22 -0500
> From: "Mike Feher" <n4fs at eozinc.com>
> Subject: RE: [NJARC] Trim your posts, Please
> To: "'New Jersey Antique Radio Club'" <njarc at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <018d01c85bd7$885e3230$0201a8c0 at gsmacdq14es>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I never get posts in digest form and never have and I am on at least 20
> reflectors. After the thread is in motion I do trim it, not because there
> are not enough bits on the web, but, it is because it is easier to read 
> for
> anyone interested. I also always reply on top of the previous post, in 
> fact,
> sometimes I do not even bother going to the bottom of previous posts to 
> read
> the reply. Some computer geeks seem to think bottom posting is the way to 
> go
> as that is the way it was 25 years ago when there was hardly anyone on 
> here.
> I am all for trimming posts, but none for the reasons Rob mentioned.
>
>
>
> Mike B. Feher, N4FS
> 89 Arnold Blvd.
> Howell, NJ, 07731
> 732-886-5960
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:njarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
> On Behalf Of Dave Sica
> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:29 PM
> To: njarc at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [NJARC] Trim your posts, Please
>
> Visit our web site - See http://www.njarc.org
> _______________________________________________
>
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:37:30 -0500 "Rob Flory" <robandpj at earthlink.net>
> writes:
>> Please trim excess quoting from your messages.  For those of us
>> reading in digest form, we have to scroll through lots of quotes to
>> find the 10 percent of new content.
>> Thank you,
>> Rob "Grumpy" Flory
>
> A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
>
> Q. And why is "top posting" also considered bad form?
>
> Cheers, Grumpy Jr.
> _______________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> NJARC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> NJARC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
>
>
> End of NJARC Digest, Vol 45, Issue 31
> *************************************