[NJARC] RME preselector

[john ruccolo]

Hi Rob,

Then perhaps the RME preselector was used primarily to
isolate the receiver from the antenna and eliminate
Local Osc. radiation. I have the Riders info, but I
wonder what kind of military documentaion was done for
the RME?

No offense intended to your classic Navy gear, but
I'll bet lots of WW2 receivers could have used some
"brightening up." Why did you mention the RAS? That
had two RF stages like the others.

The thing I don't like about the RME is that it used
noisy old 6K7 tubes. They may have been hot stuff in
1935-36, but by the start of the war there were hotter
and quieter tubes available.

So, does anybody have a Navy RU receiver for sale?

JR


--- Rob Flory <robandpj at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Visit our web site - See http://www.njarc.org
> _______________________________________________
> This would be a good question for some veterans.
> 
> The common shipboard receivers RAL, RBB, RBC, RAO,
> are in no need of "brightening up".  Maybe RBH, RAS
> could.
> 
> I haven't found any reference to other stuff made
> for the Navy by RME.
> 
> RF
> _______________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> NJARC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get your own web address.  
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL