[NJARC] Local AM broadcast Tech. Info.

[David R Sica]

Or as I always say "measure once, cut twice" (Or was that the other way
around?)

Jim: Regarding eBay Item number: 5859159930: Am I to understand that a
>100 mw carrier current system would be permissable and not subject to
the same rules as a full-blown broadcast operation?

John: Having a real station (although it might be a frightening amount of
work) would be awfully cool! 

--Dave


On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:49:10 -0500 John Dilks K2TQN
<oldradio at worldnet.att.net> writes:
> Visit our web site - See http://www.njarc.org
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Fred,
> 
> My advice is to first form a plan. Get some qualified advice from 
> those familiar with the law and with broadcast technology.  Decide 
> what's best for InfoAge, then let us know what you need.  I'm sure 
> we'll find it or buy it for you.
> 
> While the item below looks real good, there may be license problems 
> 
> or other reasons it won't work out for the site.
> 
> You may want to look into getting an actual AM broadcast license or 
> 
> one of the limited power FM licenses for the site.  Having a working 
> 
> broadcast station would be good for the site and a would be a lot of 
> 
> fun for us and would attract more volunteers to help run the station 
> I'm sure.
> 
> My Dad always told me, before you build anything get a plan or draw 
> 
> it out so you know what it will look like when it's done.  When you 
> 
> see the completed plan/drawing you may not like it - and changing it 
> 
> then is much cheaper and better than after it's built.  Dad was a 
> cabinet maker.  His advice has always been good for me and I think 
> his advice applies well here.
> 
> 73, John Dilks, K2TQN
> 
> At 12:16 AM 2/1/2006, Jim wrote:
> 
> >Check out eBay Item number: 5859159930
> >Regards,
> >Jim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> NJARC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
> 
>