[NJARC] For those who like their radios heavy.....
Ray Chase
[email protected]
Sun, 27 Jul 2003 21:32:50 -0400
My data shows the RAB weighting in at 455 # total vs. 386 # total for
the RBB or RBC so the RBB & RBC are relative lightweights.
Ray
Robert G. Flory wrote:
> >From "Evolution of Naval Radio-Electronics and Contributions of the Naval
> Research Laboratory":
>
> ......the model RAB, 1000 to 30,000 kHz (1935) provided performance which in
> most respects was not exceeded through the war period. However, its size
> and weight limited its installation to the larger ships and shore stations.
> Of the more compact and lighter models which followed, the model RAL of
> the tuned-radio-frequency type, and the models RAO, RBB, RBC, and RBS of
> the superheterodyne type were procured in large numbers....
>
> Gee, I have been laboring under the illusion that the RBB and RBC were the
> heavyweights.
>
> 73, Rob Flory
>
> _______________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
>
>