[NCham] KN4AQ letter to President Bush on BPL
Gary Pearce KN4AQ
[email protected]
Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:12:05 -0400
From the ARRL Web site:
http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/cta/
On April 26, President Bush directly supported BPL as a means of bringing
broadband Internet access to more of America.
The ARRL has issued a "call to arms" to get thousands of responses to the
White House, Senators and Congress, asking that this support be withdrawn.
ARRL CEO K1ZZ says, "We need thousands of responses from all parts of the
country, right away, if we are to make an impression."
Samples and instructions are available at the web link above. It will take
you about a half hour, max.
Here's mine:
President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear President Bush,
I appreciate the need to make high speed Internet available to all
Americans, urban or rural. But encouraging BPL - Broadband over Power
Lines - is a problem.
BPL has a serious technical flaw. Putting broadband data on power lines
creates radio signals across the shortwave radio bands. The power line
itself acts as an antenna, and the signals can interfere with - jam - radio
reception for people listening in the vicinity of the line. When power
lines everywhere are carrying BPL, the interference will also be everywhere.
The BPL operators don't want to create those signals, just as automobile
manufacturers don't want their engines to create air pollution. But
there's a limit to how much either one can do about it. In the case of
BPL, there are good alternatives like "Wi-Max" microwave distribution, and
unlike automobiles, we are not already dependent on BPL technology.
I am an Amateur Radio operator, licensed by the FCC since 1965. There is a
BPL trial system near my home in Wake County, North Carolina, operated by
Progress Energy. I've spent considerable time observing the effects. The
radio signals generated can be heard for more than a half mile, and can
interfere with Amateur Radio stations I'm trying to listen to, as well as
international shortwave broadcast stations, government and military
stations, CB radio and just about every other shortwave radio user.
Many of these services, and Amateur Radio in particular, form the backbone
of the nation's emergency communications infrastructure. When a disaster
disables the regular communications grid, shortwave radio bridges the gap
and keeps vital information flowing, with volunteer Amateur Radio operators
and their stations handling much of the job. BPL may impact that directly
by interfering with a station's ability to receive transmissions from
disaster areas (the BPL in the disaster area itself will be
inoperable). It will also have a more insidious impact. When routine
shortwave radio is difficult or impossible to use because of BPL
interference, the volunteers will hang it up. The radio equipment will be
abandoned. The skills and techniques will be forgotten.
The FCC's "Part 15" rules say that systems like BPL are not allowed to
cause this kind of interference. If they do, the power companies must make
adjustments or shut them down. This is a very thin shield. It depends on
the utility's responsiveness to an unusual customer complaint, and the
FCC's enthusiasm for interference enforcement, neither of which have good
track records. A virtual "Presidential mandate" for BPL could crumble what
meager effects this rule might have.
I know that this is a "technical" problem that most people don't
understand. It's easy to see a potential benefit of BPL, and hard to see
the harm to nearly invisible shortwave radio users. But that's what will
happen if BPL is applied to the nation's power grid.
I ask that you withdraw your support for BPL.
Sincerely,
Gary Pearce
__________________________________________________________________________
Gary Pearce KN4AQ editor, SERA Repeater Journal
Cary, NC www.sera.org
919-380-9944 [email protected]
[email protected]
AOL/Yahoo Instant Messanger: KN4AQ
(send e-mail to be put on my "buddy list")