161 at MVHS looks like a mess, and yet I am wondering to what extent those signal strengths would impact a link on 161 with LHGs at both ends, running full available power.

Was your 161 WIFi scan taken from Kurt's current link node at MVHS?

Bill


On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, 11:30 PM Chuck Gelm <nc8q-aredn@gelm.net> wrote:
The 5GHz channels at 20MHz bandwidth at MVHS is quite full.
I am proposing splitting channel 137 into two 10 MHz channels; 136 and 138.
Move John W8LRJ to channel 136 and Kurt WD8BRP to channel 138.

Currently Kurt is on channel 161@10 and that channel is quite busy at MVHS:

6 -89 161 CCMP ATT9BrJdnq N/A DC:8D:8A:7C:F2:AC AP
11 -84 161 CCMP MotoVAP_M91731SC07LK N/A BC:2E:48:56:50:17 AP
13 -82 161 CCMP AAshftu_92_5G N/A 04:42:1A:DD:B6:4C AP
15 -80 161 TKIP \x00 N/A F0:7F:06:3A:B4:98 AP
16 -79 161 TKIP PHPssid112 N/A F0:7F:06:3A:B4:9C AP
16 -79 161 CCMP Corporate_PH N/A F0:7F:06:3A:B4:9E AP
17 -78 161
PHPWifi N/A F0:7F:06:3A:B4:97 AP
17 -78 161 TKIP PHPssid116 N/A F0:7F:06:3A:B4:9F AP
18 -77 161 TKIP PHPssid113 N/A F0:7F:06:3A:B4:9D AP

_______________________________________________
MVMA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mvma
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:MVMA@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html