[MVMA] W8LRJ-MVHS-Beavercreek Node
Chuck Gelm
nc8q-aredn at gelm.net
Sat Dec 2 17:07:02 EST 2023
On 12/2/23 14:12, John Westerkamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, having studied this for a while now, here are my thoughts as to
> why the MVHS side of the link is not hearing well.
>
> 1. The MVHS node is aimed well at my house so I hear it pretty well;
> however, my node W8LRJ-BBush-MVHS is pointed at the ground or off a
> bit horizontally so its signal isn't centered in the fresnel zone so
> MVHS doesn't hear it as well.
>
> 2. The MVHS node is hearing too much of the DARA node that is aimed at
> MVHS and on a "nearby" channel (141) while W8LRJ is on 136 (both at 20
> MHz). This raises the noise floor at MVHS for nodes facing north (like
> mine)?
>
> Do either of these make sense? I can try reaiming my home node both
> vertically and horizontally and see if I can hit the sweet spot, but I
> am not hopeful.
>
> Chuck, you can run the waterfall on W8LRJ-MVHS-Beavercreek using the
> usual "F-word" password.
>
> Thanks!
>
> John
> W8LRJ
Test (2.)
Let's record signal levels as MVHS<>BBUSH
Then let's move the DARA node to channel 183 and reduce its power to 3 dBm.
Then let's re-record signal levels at MVHS<>BBUSH.
More information about the MVMA
mailing list