[MVMA] Tunnels .vs. RF revisited
Tyler Gardner
ki7odk at gmail.com
Thu Aug 18 07:07:43 EDT 2022
Chuck,
From what I have learned in the GitHub discussion, link cost is an estimate of expected packet loss. So it sounds like having user defined weights may produce unintended results.
Tyler Gardner
KI7ODK
> On Aug 18, 2022, at 6:56 AM, Chuck Gelm <nc8q-aredn at gelm.net> wrote:
>
> Testing the link latency between nc8q-services and ( w8bi-dara-services and n8jj-services )
> with and without tunnel between nc8q and n8jj:
>
> Tunnel from nc8q to n8jj disabled:
> gelmce at nc8q-mesh:~$ mtr -w -c 9 n8jj-services
> Start: 2022-08-18T06:28:13-0400
> HOST: nc8q-mesh Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 1.|-- localnode.local.mesh 0.0% 9 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.0
> 2.|-- dtdlink.NC8Q-Kettering-Centerville.local.mesh 0.0% 9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.1
> 3.|-- NC8Q-Centerville-Kettering.local.mesh 0.0% 9 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.3 0.1
> 4.|-- dtdlink.NC8Q-Centerville-HuberHeights.local.mesh 0.0% 9 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.9 0.3
> 5.|-- NC8Q-HuberHeights-Centerville.local.mesh 0.0% 9 3.5 3.8 3.4 4.9 0.5
> 6.|-- dtdlink.W8BI-DARA-Services.local.mesh 0.0% 9 3.9 4.3 3.5 7.5 1.3
> 7.|-- N8JJ-Services.local.mesh 0.0% 9 43.5 44.3 42.9 48.6 1.9
> gelmce at nc8q-mesh:~$
> -----
> Tunnel from nc8q to n8jj enabled:
> gelmce at nc8q-mesh:~$ mtr -w -c 9 n8jj-services
> Start: 2022-08-18T06:31:16-0400
> HOST: nc8q-mesh Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 1.|-- localnode.local.mesh 0.0% 9 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.1
> 2.|-- dtdlink.NC8Q-hAP.local.mesh 0.0% 9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.1
> 3.|-- 172.31.187.149 0.0% 9 45.8 44.5 42.1 47.2 1.9
> 4.|-- N8JJ-Services.local.mesh 0.0% 9 43.3 44.5 42.3 49.3 2.6
> gelmce at nc8q-mesh:~$
>
> Note that the latency between nc8q and n8jj is, more or less, equal via tunnel or 3 RF hops and 3 DtD links.
> -----
>
> Testing over a 16 mile link:
> Tunnel from nc8q to n8jj enabled:
> gelmce at nc8q-mesh:~$ mtr -w -c 9 w8bi-dara-services
> Start: 2022-08-18T06:32:34-0400
> HOST: nc8q-mesh Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 1.|-- localnode.local.mesh 0.0% 9 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.1
> 2.|-- dtdlink.NC8Q-hAP.local.mesh 0.0% 9 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.1
> 3.|-- 172.31.187.149 0.0% 9 46.2 45.2 42.0 47.4 2.0
> 4.|-- dtdlink.N8JJ-Services.local.mesh 0.0% 9 47.0 45.5 42.6 48.6 2.2
> 5.|-- W8BI-DARA-Services.local.mesh 0.0% 9 82.2 83.9 81.4 87.6 2.3
>
> Tunnel from nc8q to n8jj disabled:
> gelmce at nc8q-mesh:~$ mtr -w -c 9 w8bi-dara-services
> Start: 2022-08-18T06:35:30-0400
> HOST: nc8q-mesh Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 1.|-- localnode.local.mesh 0.0% 9 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.0
> 2.|-- dtdlink.NC8Q-Kettering-Centerville.local.mesh 0.0% 9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.1
> 3.|-- NC8Q-Centerville-Kettering.local.mesh 0.0% 9 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.5 0.2
> 4.|-- dtdlink.NC8Q-Centerville-HuberHeights.local.mesh 0.0% 9 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.9 0.2
> 5.|-- NC8Q-HuberHeights-Centerville.local.mesh 0.0% 9 3.4 3.7 3.3 4.2 0.3
> 6.|-- W8BI-DARA-Services.local.mesh 0.0% 9 6.5 5.0 3.7 6.8 1.3
> gelmce at nc8q-mesh:~$
>
> Not that latency increases 16X with 2 tunnels .vs. 3 RF and 2 DtD hops.
>
> IMHO and regardless of complexity,
> 99% of tunnel.vs.RF routing issues are solvable if the tunnel weight was a user editable setting.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MVMA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mvma
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MVMA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mvma/attachments/20220818/16b9bb33/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the MVMA
mailing list