[MRIC] ICS 213 - Request Your Input

[al.fitzsimons at att.net]

Appreciate hearing from the WASH, BACO, FRED, HARF, KENT, STMA, TALB, and WICO  jurisdictions who have provided ideas on how the ICS 213 General Message should look and function.  
Would especially like to hear from the other jurisdictions concerning the features you would like to see and the reasons why and those you would like removed and the reasons why.

I also wanted to clear up two misconceptions:
Pat - 
I believe you misunderstood my request for any further comments (not discussion) on the draft ICS 213 General Message form after the upcoming COMMEX.  As you mention in your comments, the MRIC and particularly this QTH reflector are the best venues to use for this.
Ray - 
As of April 3, there was insufficient feedback to justify changing items on the existing draft.  Rest assured your comments count and are appreciated and will be given full consideration.  

Thanks for your participation in this important task.  But keep in mind that as further guidance is forthcoming (the revised NIMS manual is due out in September) and more extensive experience is amassed, it is likely that revisions will result.

Al, W3YRS